It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
With five percent of the world's population, the U.S. has close to a quarter of the world's prisoners. How did the American criminal justice system go so wrong?
How can you tell when a democracy is dead? When concentration camps spring up and everyone shivers in fear? Or is it when concentration camps spring up and no one shivers in fear because everyone knows they're not for "people like us" (in Woody Allen's marvelous phrase) but for the others, the troublemakers, the ones you can tell are guilty merely by the color of their skin, the shape of their nose or their social class?
At yearend 2005 there were 3,145 black male sentenced prison inmates per 100,000 black males in the United States, compared to 1,244 Hispanic male inmates per 100,000 Hispanic males and 471 white male inmates per 100,000 white males.
Contrary to popular perception, violent crime is not responsible for the quadrupling of the incarcerated population in the United States since 1980. In fact, violent crime rates have been relatively constant or declining over the past two decades. The exploding prison population has been propelled by public policy changes that have increased the use of prison sentences as well as the length of time served, e.g. through mandatory minimum sentencing, "three strikes" laws, and reductions in the availability of parole or early release.
Although these policies were championed as protecting the public from serious and violent offenders, they have instead yielded high rates of confinement of nonviolent offenders. Nearly three quarters of new admissions to state prison were convicted of nonviolent crimes.2 Only 49 percent of sentenced state inmates are held for violent offenses.3
Perhaps the single greatest force behind the growth of the prison population has been the national "war on drugs." The number of incarcerated drug offenders has increased twelvefold since 1980. In 2000, 22 percent of those in federal and state prisons were convicted on drug charges.4
Even more troubling than the absolute number of persons in jail or prison is the extent to which those men and women are African-American. Although blacks account for only 12 percent of the U.S. population, 44 percent of all prisoners in the United States are black
Ratio of Percent of Blacks Among Resident Population to Blacks Among Incarcerated Population
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
Non- whites are usually more poor and get involved in stealing, gangs, ect. The suburban white has less of a reason to commit stealing ect, it is two different ways of life.
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
Non- whites are usually more poor and get involved in stealing, gangs, ect. The suburban white has less of a reason to commit stealing ect, it is two different ways of life.
yes, I understand this, but why does this happen, in the days of supposed equality.
Are you saying that racial prejudice is endemic in the US? in the form of equality in the workplace, and education?
Please understand, that as a UK citizen I have no real conception of race relations in the US (except for what I see/read in the news), and I ask in a non inflammatory way for information purposes.
Originally posted by ninthaxis
There is a recent case of the FBI setting up 2 men for murder. They were in prison for 30 years. There are also many cases of people who should have gone to prison that didn't. Of course it's harder to prove that the government set people up than it is for letting criminals go. I live in a small city (56,000 people) and there isn't much violence here. Its just alcohol is being cracked down on. It is illegal to be "under the influence" on city streets these days. This town has 3 universities and at one point the highest concentration of bars in one area. Now it is illegal for these students to walk home from the bars if they display signs of slurred speech, red eyes, abnormal walking. These students are put on electronic monitoring for a first offense, second offense is jail. Stupid things like this cause the 2 year old jail to already be over crowded.
# In 2005, over 7 million people were on probation, in jail or prison, or on parole at yearend 2005 -- 3.2% of all U.S. adult residents or 1 in every 32 adults.
# State and Federal prison authorities had in custody 1,446,269 inmates at yearend 2005: 1,259,905 in State custody and 179,220 in Federal custody.
# Local jails held 747,529 persons awaiting trial or serving a sentence at midyear 2005. An additional 71,905 persons under jail supervision were serving their sentence in the community.
Between yearend 1995 and yearend 2005, the incarcerated population grew an average 3.3% annually. Population growth during the 12-month period ending December 31, 2005 was lower in State prisons (up 1.3%) than in Federal prison (up 5.1%) and local jails (up 4.7%).
source
* At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80% will be released to parole supervision.
* At yearend 2002, 1,440,655 prisoners were under the jurisdiction of State or Federal correctional authorities.
* In 2001, about 592,000 State prison inmates were released to the community after serving time in prison.
* Nearly 33% of State prison releases in 1999 were drug offenders, 25% were violent offenders and 31% were property offenders.
* 670,169 adults were under State parole supervision at yearend 2002.
* By the end of 2000, 16 States had abolished discretionary release from prison by a parole board for all offenders.
* Among State parole discharges in 2000, 41% successfully completed their term of supervision; relatively unchanged since 1990.
The United States has seen a recent increase in the number of private firm/correctional facility partnerships that uses prison labor to manufacture goods and provide services.
Let's think seriously about prison labor. For the last few years it has persisted as a cloud on the horizon no bigger than a man's hand. It is now gathering over our heads and becoming dark and ominous. Crime is decreasing, but the federal prison population is swelling by leaps and bounds. It's sitting at 130,000 at the moment and expected to climb to 200,000 by 2006. Our leaders in Congress have put 21,000 federal prisoners to work in prison industries, currently making goods for the Federal government. The same thing is happening in the State of Mississippi. State contracts are going to prison industries to help defray the incredible costs of housing, feeding and taking care of thousands upon thousands of inmates sentenced for long terms without parole.
You might say "well and good -- let them contribute to their own upkeep and they won't be such a burden on the taxpayer." That's what the Republican leadership is saying, along with many Democrats. The push is on, under a bill sponsored by Rep. Bill McCollum, a Florida Republican, to allow federal prison industries to compete in the private sector.
The Real Cost of Prisons Project believes if the movement to end mass incarceration is to advance it is vital that grassroots community activists gain a deeper understanding of the social, political and economic forces fuel and shape the criminal injustice system. If we are to grasp why more than two million people are incarcerated in the United States we must look at complex set of entwined relationships situated in race, gender, class and place.
Consider these facts: Despite the record growth performance of the U.S. economy in the 1990s, hourly wages, adjusted for inflation, remain lower than they were thirty years ago. The ranks of the working poor have swollen, partially due to the introduction of work requirements for welfare programs. Economic successes, at least those based on mainstream measurements, have not produced substantial benefits for those most in need. Basic health care remains out of reach for a significant portion of the population, household debts have risen to their highest level in recent U.S. history, unequal educational opportunities abound, and poverty remains an entrenched reality in the richest nation on earth.
Many social inequalities, like those perpetuated in the criminal justice system, have direct connections to material inequalities produced by current economic policies. These economic inequalities have reached unprecedented heights. In 1998, the average value of the financial assets of the wealthiest 10% of U.S. households was over 300 times the average holdings of the bottom 25% of all households. The context in which people’s lives unfold – including the evolution of the U.S. criminal justice system and patterns of incarceration – is deeply affected by the type of economy in which we live. A better understanding of the political economy of the U.S. criminal justice system has become increasingly important for the work of activists.
What is political economy? Political economy is an approach to analyzing economic issues in which the political influence, the amount of wealth, and the social position of key players and socio-economic groups is explicitly taken into account. Political economy not only examines total costs and benefits, but explicitly asks the question: who’s benefiting and why?
Originally posted by budski
Looking at the occupancy stats, it shows that US prison are also overcrowded, with an occupancy percentage 107.6%.
This is not as bad as some countries, but any overcrowding is bad - it points to one of two reasons:
1) There are not enough prisons
2) Crime rate has increased above predicted levels (for whatever reason).
...
Originally posted by KLSyesca
I feel the real reason for the prison planet is the three strikes law..Why do we pay the judge after we stripped them of his or her power to sentence . The judges have no power they are a none factor,special circumstances are a none factor.