Conservatives: Do you still support The Bush Administration?

This administration leaked information on a spy spouse of someone who did not follow the script, suporting their Niger Uranium purchase theory by Iraq. The ramifications stretched beyond that single individual, as every touch point of Plame's travels now were under scrutiny; hence all intelligence resources in her circle possibly compromised. Nothing that we'll hear a death count on, but it happened.

CONTRAST THAT

...to a cabinet member being a "whistle Blower" on an administration that he had first hand work experience with, on how they are political as their sole directive on policy, had lied to voters, Congress & then citizens, and have accounted for 10's of thousands of deaths & billions lost because of those lies.

WHICH ONE HAD A WHITE HOUSE INVESTIGATION LAUNCHED IN 24 HOURS?

That's right, they have already opened an investigation into how a picture of a possibly classified document appeared during Mr. O'Neill's TV interview.

The spy outing for political vengence? Over 3 months later, with little wind in it's sails, to boot.

I slammed the O'Neill appointment on ATS, but here is someone who has come clean & knows it carries weight...alng with the vengful repercussions, with this statement: " I'm old. I'm rich. They can't hurt me."

So, after:

- Two Administration officials blow the whistle
- The Army calling the war on a word, "Unnecessary"
- The Mid East Envoy - Gen .Zinni calling the whole thing a cluster
- Several resignations
- Recanting of claims from Powell to Blair

...do you still support them?

Don't expect a response, BT. See, if its one thing a repugnant can't stand its riduclue. See, if they don't support the monkey, then they will have to admit we were right all along (somethig they can't do). If they still support the monkey, then they will knowingly expose themselves as the retarded children they are. They will show that the the tumblers in their brain are rusted out and hanging on by a screw.

Its a Catch-22. So the best response is none.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Colonel]

It takes a man to admit he was wrong and move on. I think they can do it and find a new leader.

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL
It takes a man to admit he was wrong and move on. I think they can do it and find a new leader.

Don't count on it. You don't know these "people" like I do. As I have said before, All repugnants are corrupt to the soul. I don't care if its your grandmother! They are part of the problem!

Why should they change from Bush when they are getting what they want---religious fanaticism, a police state, and destruction of the world. They don't care!


And that's why I hate them.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Colonel]

Did I forget to mention that they were cowards too? Proof? Have you seen one repugnant post here since BT put this thread up? Nope? Me neither.

But, we'll see if any ATS member of the American Nazi Party...errrr...any ATS repugnant party member will show up.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Colonel]

I must say as a registered republican, I am deeply dissapointed in this administration. Bout Time's post is right on the money. But my distrust of Bush, Cheney, Powell, etc. goes much farther back than the recent O'Neill story. This just confirms most of my suspicions about Dubbya and (to quote another poster) the "Not See Party".

This is why I no longer consider myself a republican. Nor do I consider myself a democrat. I guess you can call me a political floater. I choose not to side with any one party. My view is that most Republicans in Congress now are really Democrat lite. The big spending, the "Big Government" mentality, the list goes on and on. And I only forsee it worsening in the next 4 years.

However, I do agree with some of Dubbya's policies. But those are very few and far between.

Despite my feelings on an "imperfect" administration and the obvious flaws in some of the US foreign policies and handlings, I will be either abstaining my vote or voting for Bush.
The Democrats offer nothing but the same old BS to replace Bush. I, as has been mentioned, know where I at least stand the majority of the time with Bush....Clark, maybe.



regards
seekerof

You probably won't fully know how they stand until its down the nomination...

Anywho, I think I'm probably going to abstain my vote again this year unless Harry Brown runs again...

Right now, with the way everything looks it is another damned if you, damned if you don't presidential election. Who knows, maybe whoever gets the nomination will surprise me. I think Dean would do alright, he just wouldn't go down as a truly great president.

Just look at these repugnants. LOOK AT 'EM! No sense of shame whatsoever. "Oh, the dems are just like the repugnants. It doesn't matter."

NO...I DON'T THINK SO, NAZI!

You know Colonel, you never cease to amaze me with your "lawyer" cliches'...really.

You comment this earlier in this thread:
"Did I forget to mention that they were cowards too? Proof? Have you seen one repugnant post here since BT put this thread up? Nope? Me neither.

But, we'll see if any ATS member of the American Nazi Party...errrr...any ATS repugnant party member will show up.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Colonel]"


Then WHEN those sorry arse Repugnants respond, you counter with:

"Just look at these repugnants. LOOK AT 'EM! No sense of shame whatsoever. "Oh, the dems are just like the repugnants. It doesn't matter."

NO...I DON'T THINK SO, NAZI!"


So I guess, between you and BT, this was a set-up thread to further your own agendas by bashing those "repugnents" that did post to this thread?
I'm won't speak for BT, but you are a very funny guy!



regards
seekerof

I have to vote. I can't see myself abstaining. It's kinda bad to see folk leaning that way. A few weeks ago I was more on the Bush team because Dean gets under my skin...he's just not my type of people, you know. Maybe its a mid-west thing.

There's always gunna be a compromise when you vote. Truly it's getting worse rather than better. I remember weighing Bush v. Gore--that sucked both were born into politics and still were bad politicans. But, Bush v. Dean will beyond suck because I have equal disdain for both. I don't know which I'll choose and right now I'm not leaning either way...

Bush with his new policy for illegal workers and all the neo-trash in his administration. And Dean, with his lack of real vision and his consistant double talk, insistance on raising taxes, and the fact that he hired no brown or black people in five years of running Vermont added to his rebel flag comment. How do you choose when both options are this crappy?

Originally posted by Saphronia
and the fact that he hired no brown or black people in five years of running Vermont added to his rebel flag comment. How do you choose when both options are this crappy?

Saphronia, I can't believe you fell for that ho hiring of blacks or browns thing. How many blacks or browns live in Vermont? Like 2.

And they both work for Ben & Jerry's.

So, don't fault Dean for not hiring any minorities when there are no minorities to hire.

I'm surprised at how many people actually 'abstain' or say they might this year. I don't know, to me that seems like a vote in itself in a way. Vote for someone, anyone... just get our vote count up! Particpate damnit. jk

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by RANT]

Saphronia, I can't believe you fell for that ho hiring of blacks or browns thing. How many blacks or browns live in Vermont? Like 2.

Ahh, TRUE ignorance shows it's face proudly on ATS.

Get a clue Klink.

No, you get a clue, NAZI! How many black/Latinos live in Vermont if you knw so much!

See, you gotta head the Nazi--repugnant--- off at the pass before he is allowed to create more tricks to fool you. Dean shouldn't be castigated for not hiring minorities when there isn't a pool of minorities to draw from.

WTF check this out
quickfacts.census.gov...

96.8% of Vermont is white!!!

That's still 3032 more "Blacks or Browns" than Colonels bull# statistic of "2".
It really doesn't matter though. Affirmative action requires you to hire minorities no matter what the local population percentages are. Dean is a racist as is Colonel.

edit... On topic. I'm undecided right now but I know I'm not voting for any of the Democratic contenders at this point. I highly doubt I will vote for Bush (maybe just to piss off Colonel) Have to wait and see what third party candidates crawl out in the next few months...

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Fry2]

Originally posted by Fry2
That's still 3032 more "Blacks or Browns" than Colonels bull# statistic of "2".
It really doesn't matter though. Affirmative action requires you to hire minorities no matter what the local population percentages are. Dean is a racist as is Colonel.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Fry2]

Now, we get into lies about AA. You're lying about the rules of AA, NAZI. But, what am I to expect, you're a repugnant. There are virtually no blacks/Latinos in Vermont but now Dean is a racist for not hiring one.

I tell you people, repugnants have no scruples and lack any kind of moral decency. Don't believe me? Look at the Bush WHite House! Look at what they've done to our country. But, see when you make a pact with Satan, these are the results.

[Edited on 13-1-2004 by Colonel]

Come on, repugnants. Get back into the light---with me. Stop serving the Princes of Darkness. Stop being duped by evil. Let loose the Spirit of Cain!