It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Anyway, I don't quite see a reason. I mean, just WHY? There's no motive.
No logic. These where, as far as I'm concerned, Pissed off kids with a bit of hate in the minds.
CRAP. There I said it or I could not sleep. This thread is the biggest bunch of nonsense I have ever seen. Black op? lol.....jeesh.....Who are they going to get to pull of this op.......secret army under another airport. OH OH OH WAIT ...maybe the Activity did it...Yeah...WOW
Even if the person wasn't named, there's no background whatsoever on the person; just "a person".
I was referring back to another post about other gunmen. They would have ditched the black jumpsuits and just faded away. If there were any there at all.
And if someone want Harris dead, there are easier ways to go about it.
Originally posted by LordCarpainter
Nothing provided in this post is speculation. It's all evidence. The MKULTRA information was gained from first-hand testimony of someone who worked at Plattsburgh AFB.
That's not to say the information isn't factual. It's to say they got it from another source (John Quinn, NewsHawk) and they would be required to say that just so no one can discredit Think About It if the article proves false. But Quinn is going on first-hand testimony of people who worked at Plattsburgh AFB
I would find it hard to swallow that NATO, as a whole or in part, would have anything to do with a 'School Shooting' or anything similar.
April 21, 2000 | One day after filing a federal lawsuit against the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, the lead lawyer representing the family of slain Columbine High School teacher Dave Sanders charged the department with a coverup Thursday, alleging that officials have kept details of exactly what went on last April 20 from victims' families and the public.
"On at least one particular item, I affirmatively believe they were involved in a coverup," Peter Grenier said. "Absolutely, yes. A human being directly told us that," he said. "A human being affirmatively demonstrated a coverup."
He said the department has been extremely uncooperative, forcing the family to hire private detectives. "Our case is based on a lot of lengthy, expensive private investigation," he said. "No one from the sheriff's office would tell us anything."
Rohrbough's parents and other families went to federal court last month with damning documentation of a law enforcement cover-up. Their motion to reopen dismissed lawsuits against the police includes the following examples of obstruction and falsification:
-- The department initially denied meeting with parents who had complained a year before the shooting that Eric Harris made death threats against their son. Cops later admitted that they had met several times with the parents and had known about Harris's suspected illegal activities -- including building pipe bombs.
-- The department assured families that all FBI documents related to the Columbine investigation have been released. But the material available to the public is nowhere near the number of pages the FBI has stated is in its files.
(AP) The families of five slain Columbine students asked that a federal grand jury investigate their claims that authorities have covered up evidence that one student was killed by police.
"Lies have been told, beyond any doubt," family attorney Barry Arrington said after he submitted his request to the U.S. Attorney's Office on Tuesday. "The only issue is, why are they lying?"
It is obvious to most observers that the two teenage shooters had help. Transporting and prepositioning the number of bombs into the school exceeded what two boys could carry in even a dozen trips. Bombs the size of 20 lb. propane cylinders cannot be hidden under a trenchcoat. How did they get them into the school without detection? Taking the bombs into the building would have required numerous trips. This could not have been done during daylight or when the school was open since the bombs were large and impossible to conceal under clothing. They must have had a key or access through an accomplice. How did the bombs go undetected since some were not so well hidden?
It took five years, a state grand jury and key evidence from a reluctant witness, but families who lost children in the attack on Columbine High School finally had their worst suspicions confirmed: Top Jefferson County leaders knew something awful about prior police investigations of killers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, and they'd known it since shortly after the 1999 shootings. The officials knew plenty, denied most of it, and hid as much as they could for as long as they could.
Called by Colorado Attorney General Ken Salazar, the grand jury released a summary of its findings two weeks ago. Although the probe of missing police documents resulted in no indictments, it did raise questions about "suspicious" actions by the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office brass, including the shredding of a large pile of Columbine files. Most stunning of all, the report charged that a few days after the massacre, several high-ranking county officials met secretly and resolved to suppress key documents stemming from the JCSO's earlier investigation of Harris, to treat them as if they didn't exist -- in short, to lie about them.
"It's amazing," says Brian Rohrbough, whose son, Dan, died on the steps of Columbine. "While we were planning a funeral, these guys were already planning a cover-up."
Why do investigators say Harris and Klebold killed themselves at 12:05 p.m., but live coverage indicated shots were being fired in the school until approximately 3:45?
Originally posted by Grailkeeper
I am still having a hard time with this.
If 'mind control' was indeed used, wouldn't the perpetrators involved want to have no distinction with the subjects that carried out the deed??
It makes no sense that something so 'secretive' would have so much "Evidence" to the contrary.
Why would the mysterious 'Men in black' not dress in trench coats as to not draw attention to themselves later on?
Why would an 'undercover' FBI agent be standing next door to the School and why would he be doing such a piss-poor job of being 'undercover' as to have someone identify him as such.
Hey... still a great post
I have to admit, my curiosity was piqued, so I spent some time poking around in places other than "Think About It", read most of "Rocky Mountain Horror Show" www.cyberspaceorbit.com... and still couldn't see where this "first hand testimony" and "evidence" is. Sure, he says he spoke with "someone" , but that doesn't make his claims true. I could say that I have evidence that proves we have a base on the dark side of the moon because someone told me, but that wouldn't make it a fact. That is just a drawback of the Internet, too many people saying things that aren't true to sell a book or something. That doesn't apply to you, OP, I still think you did a bang-up job starting this thread!
Exactly. Mind Control oftentimes makes the victim experience large gaps of time in his memory. Thus it is often impossible to trace the patsy/victim to the mind controller. It is typical for the school shooter to have been mentally 'treated' though curiously their shrinks are never interviewed.
Originally posted by Grailkeeper
If 'mind control' was indeed used, wouldn't the perpetrators involved want to have no distinction with the subjects that carried out the deed??
A large majoriy of the earwitnesses at Dealey Plaza head shots coming from the grassy knoll. Well over a hundred eyewitnesses saw a missile streak up to TWA 800. Over a hundred witnesses at Columbine gave statements indicating more than two involved. But that stuff is found down there in the fine print, and the mainstream media doesn't bother with that.
It makes no sense that something so 'secretive' would have so much "Evidence" to the contrary.
All the cops were on the lookout for people in trench coats. The cops even drew down on a fireman whose protective overcoat was covered with black soot. BTW, a lot of the survivors recall being more terrorized by the 'good guys' that came to rescue them than when the shooters were roaming the school.
Why would the mysterious 'Men in black' not dress in trench coats as to not draw attention to themselves later on?
I figure he(not necessarily FBI) was watching. Maybe the witness noticed his general 'cop' look or maybe he was holding a radio or something.
Why would an 'undercover' FBI agent be standing next door to the School and why would he be doing such a piss-poor job of being 'undercover' as to have someone identify him as such.
Originally posted by Boondock78
this is a tough one for me man.....that is kinda the perfect area to test out a little mkultra program in a school.
some of it sounds like that 'had' to be under some sort of influence...going bowling before school. so many people saying they were smiling and enjoying it and such....i could see a hardened killer that has done it many times before(had they) get a kick...i can see if you are going on a rampage 'enjoying' that feeling of redemption or revenge or whatever but not like what is explained with them.
for me though, it is 100% believable that these two kids were just so friggin tormented that they cracked(perfect cover up story. everyone can understand this.)...
kids in highschool are cruel man. no matter how big/small your town is...if you're one of the select few unlucky sob's that get picked on by the whole friggin school, i see them breaking and going on a rampage very believable...some kids go through a lot of pain in school. when i was going to highschool, there were more than one instance of a kid not coming to school and found hanging in his garage or something...
highschool kids have a TON of pressure coming at them from all angles, i can only imagine being someone who gets tormented too.