It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budski
I read a theory, many years ago (forgot who by, but I believe it was a biologist) who was adamant that asymmetrical lifeforms were unlikely to exist, as it is not the most economic form for life to take - i.e. it would have been "weeded out" under darwinian theory.
Originally posted by neformoreIn our environment, the human form is the most adapatble, as the sensory organisation provides us with the best chances of survival. It makes sense that creatures from a similar environment would therefore take a similar form, doesn't it?
Originally posted by budskiWhich is, I believe, what I posted on the previous page - albeit in slightly different language.
Originally posted by TheBaldEagle
well back in Roswell it was to easiest way to fake a army video of a alien
and their are some theories about why they look simler
some think they wanted to play god so they made us
some think that back when we were just cave men we looked a lot more like our cousins the monkeys and when they first saw us they knew we where to stupid to survive long so they came down and showed us how to survive speek ect. but when they came down they saw that our females where extremely attractive so they mated with them and that's how we are today
Originally posted by TheBaldEagle
well back in Roswell it was to easiest way to fake a army video of a alien
and their are some theories about why they look simler
some think they wanted to play god so they made us
some think that back when we were just cave men we looked a lot more like our cousins the monkeys and when they first saw us they knew we where to stupid to survive long so they came down and showed us how to survive speek ect. but when they came down they saw that our females where extremely attractive so they mated with them and that's how we are today