posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 09:29 PM
i have yet to make a decision on wether 9/11 was an inside job or wether it was done by terrorist organizations in a way that the gov't isn't
exactly telling us the truth about. The official story is a joke, kind of like the warren commission report.
but i reserve my judgement and honestly i don't really care that much, i mean i would ask someone like Melbourne Militia the following
IF 9/11 as found out to have inside involvement from "rogue" elements within the U.S gov't and intelligence agency's and that "HYPOTHETICALLY"
it was * proven to be this way (not sure what proven really mean's ) but anyway what would be the ramifications of evidence of U.S involvement in the
attacks? I mean we started a war because of it, granted people who had foreknowldge and invested in DEfense company's Made millions upon millions,
and strategically we have secured some more oil fields. but also many hundreds of thousands of combined Iraqi's, Afghans and American soldiers have
died. What would the penalty be levied back at the america for this sickening act?
You know and how about the possibillity that all the war spending propped up the economy for a few more years and perhaps suspending iraq investing in
euro's gave the dollar a little more strength for a few years (2003-2006) and suppose this helped american's standard of living and purchasing
power.
3000 or so people were killed that fateful day on sept. 11 2001 and it was unfathomably tragic , especially for the victim's families. However in the
big scheme of things you shoud understand, even if rogue elements within the gov't completed this act/ w help, you still have a better chance being
struck by lighting and being killed than a victim of a false flag terror attack.
I think in the big picture, the most important thing in society for gov'ts is to maintain "order". yes there is profit to be made from chaos, but
controlled chaos . Certain difficult strategic decisions that may need to be made to maintain a country's position in the world may involve
inconceivable plans (such as operation northwoods) where a few hundred or even thousand deaths are seen as a means to an end. And bringing me back to
an earlier point, how much disorder would be risked (in the name of civil protest and violence ) if should we say american gov't involvement was
linked w/ 9/11. Any evidence would need to be surpressed in order to maintain the very security of the nation. The potential for chaos and disorder
would be too high to risk finding out if the people could handle the truth about rogue fractions of gov't making poor deady decisons or wether it was
small elite fractions of gov't trying strengthen their global influence in the world and profitting handsomely at the same time (while sacrificing
and seeing 3000 american deaths as a mean to this end) especialy deaths of citizens the decision makers may not have any personal ties with.
it is those who are too uncomfortable to fathom the different possibilites (wether they wouldn't feel safe still) who may need the bliss in which
this ignorance provides them.
The Federal Reserve was designed to be a monster that devours economy's and leaves people drowning in debt. The employees are puppets are mostly just
indoctrinated and enjoy the prestige and power of the positions. They are just pawns in the elite's self serving system. The bigger question is
wether the elite's decide they would like to hyper inflate the credit supply ( and indebt as many people as possible) AND then short the markets and
allow a deflation of asset prices to occur. This of course would leave people with a smaller chance of ever paying back there debt which after the
deflation would appear relatively several times larger.
Also a sneakier way to get the same conclusion i think would be to try to offset a credit deflation (that would inevitably have to occur) by printing
more and more money and then finding a way to lend it out, by doing this inflation would likely flow into goods and sevices as well as gold. People's
assets would'nt lose the value as obviously as in a bout of price deflation, however the result would be the same, although in deflation the wealthy
would be #ed because their high debt would never be paid back, in hyperinflation people would drown in the costs of living and this rising tide would
take out the lower classes first and work their way up , likely as asset prices would not be rising in price nearly as fast as living expenses (food,
gas, etc)
[edit on 13-1-2008 by cpdaman]