It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gools
Originally posted by swimmer
... This looks more like a .gov site with a sole purpose to make any alternative way of thinking (NORMAL WAY OF THINKING) look bad, ugly and completely wrong.
ATS is not different from CNN, only it has slightly different purpose.
Brave moderators are defending official truth...once again.
What the hell are you talking about? If you hate it here so much, don't let the door hit you on the way out. Your post is extremely insulting.
Want to discuss holocaust denial with all the other little neo-nazis? Go to this thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Want to discuss the "no planes it was all holograms and project blue beam theory"? Try an ATS search. There's plenty of threads.
Want to discuss how ATS itself is a cointelpro operation? There's even a thread for that, more than one in fact.
ATS has never silenced any topic for discussion and your post is extremely insulting.
Just because we won't succumb to board gangs or let the lunatics run the asylum does not make us the bad guys.
.
Originally posted by buddha
ATS keep using one bad comment to kill the whole post.
this is the best way to Hide info.
that they dont wont you to know.
Originally posted by hooper
at this point you have to start coming up with something testable and substantial
They're your own uneducated, bias regurgitations with no basis in fact or reality
So why do you think that reporter you quoted lied about it being almost 20 feet deep? Why are you calling her a liar?
I think you are getting things a little mixed up.
Someday, maybe, far in the future, you'll actually answer a question.
But I doubt it.
Thank you, that pretty much covers and explains your particular flavor of delusion.
You haven't. You just keep throwing around the word "physics". That doesn't count.
Or, more likely, reviewing the regurgitation of your baseless findings of incredulity.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
And then explain why after more than ten years you haven't gotten anywhere with this line of "questioning".
And really, comparing the impact into a tower and into the ground? You're really sounding silly now.
All that being said, you still have no clue what to do with any information anyway, so its a moot point. Now please continue trying to tell everyone why you can't do an analysis because you don't have enough information.
Do you plan to actually post evidence of this at some point or this akin to your Shanksville crater opinion - simply hoping by constantly repeating it, it will some how magically come true?
You, of course, are more than welcome to keep repeating this misinformation, as is your perogative. However, don't be suprised if no one takes it seriously. 10 years and counting now.
While Osama made it happen on purpose... Bush let it happen on purpose!
originally posted by: piacenza
Just a question about the TV Fakery, I noticed there are a lot of members that derail the discussion on the other side as well. Instead than debating about the issue they derail it constantly without even considering the evidences (by their own admission). ATS its yours so you might as well forbid those kind of theories on the 911 forum. But why someone is allowed to blame another member without even looking at the evidence? It sounds to me this is a one way warning and I do not feel its fair in any way.
Again why don't you split the forum and make a section for absurde 911 conspiracy where ppl can post what they feel like are real issue to be dealt with. If you feel that some of the posts are "absurd" move them to the "absurd" forum. I would gladly have a real debate about those issues than having to read post after post of ppl saying that if you believe those conspiracy stories you are an idiot or you need professional help.
You should warn ppl that derail the thread right away either way.
What is a good question by the way? that the nose cone its actually air? Or is it a column? Or bad digital compression all the time? How do you answer constantly to those attacks? PPL need as well in the other side to provide proofs, real evidence like nice high resolution videos otherwise our "theory" (reality) is as good as others.
originally posted by: Christie
are there ATS polls re: 9-11 opinions?
hoping to get a feel for the overall leanings at this site.
and i'm hearing vague stuff on the net generally about "no planes" or directed energy weaponry being suddenly a controversial subject.
i'm new here...i wondered if anyone in-the-know at ATS could give me a reasonable dispassionate summary of what the controversy is.
i'm up to speed on 9-11 and have drawn my own conclusions but remain open to new findings and ideas.
thank you.
Christie.