posted on May, 17 2007 @ 06:20 PM
So the Israeli government, through the Mossad, managed to pull off the most deadly and spectacular terrorist attacks in the history of mankind, and
then were foolish enough to be seen celebrating and cheering in front of countless Americans? They were able to successfully hijack four passenger
jets and fly three of them into buildings, but failed to leave a van full of explosives on the George Washington Bridge?
And if their goal was to blame the Palestinians for the bridge bombing, as is alleged in the above provided link, then why would they set al Qaida up
to take the fall for the plane attacks? If it was Israel's goal to have us fight their wars then wouldn't it make more sense to frame an
Iranian-backed terrorist group, like Hezbollah, rather than an Afghanistan-backed terror group like al Qaida? Wouldn't Israel rather us be fighting
their #1 enemy in Iran right now, than stuck in an endless battle in Iraq? Clearly Iran posed, and continues to pose, a more serious threat to Israel
than Iraq ever did. Aside from lobbing a few scud missiles that barely killed anyone at Israel, and giving $25,000 to the families of some suicide
bombers, Iraq was hardly a major thorn in the side of Israel... especially in comparison to the Iranian government, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Syrian
government, the Saudi government, PFLP, etc, etc.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I am willing to believe that Israel knew about the attacks in advance and possibly were there to film the
attacks. But I'm going to require a little more evidence to believe that Israel actually carried out the attacks on 9/11. I think that some people,
especially on this site, want there to be a conspiracy so badly that they are willing to accept any shred of "evidence" as fact. And I think that
the above-linked site takes it upon itself to draw a lot of conclusions from very little information. There is a huge difference between the Mossad
knowing about the attacks ahead of time, and actually carrying them out themselves.
Another quick note that I found kind of ironic.... the site uses as "evidence" the fact that we blamed bin Laden and al Qaida for 9/11 despite the
fact that they had never in their history carried out an attack on that scale. Well, aren't they blaming the Mossad for 9/11 even though they have
never carried out an attack on that scale? The fact is that there has never been an attack on the scale of 9/11. I am still not convinced that it
was beyond the abilities of a group like al Qaida to carry out such an attack.
And before I go, PLEASE, I don't want anyone to label me or think of me as an Israeli-sympathizer or supporter. Because I'm certainly not.
Although I consider their people to be an ally of the United States, I find many of their government's actions to be evil and counterproductive. I
think the amount of money our government provides them in military aid is absurd. And I think that we should have bombed the hell out of them after
their blatant attack on the USS Liberty. Israel has far too much influence with our government, and our blind support for them has caused us to lose
a lot of credibility and a lot of allies throughout the world. I think it's about time that we turn the tables on them and start influencing their
policies, instead of the other way around. But all of that is a FAR CRY from carrying out a spectacular terror attack on the US and killing 3,000
people, while managing to set up al Qaida for it.