It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jarheadjock
uhhhh hello?!?! am i the only crazy guy here who smells "NWO Agenda"!??! LOL well i do!!! and this is an invasion of privacy. I am all for it to capture criminals but on a nationwide scale??? I think not, and with alot of things going on at once with what their monitoring for (terrorism, school shootings/planning, illegal downloading, pedophiles, etc.) it can be real easy to be branded as doing those activities when you dont do them. I feel uncomfortable even more that the US Gov is doing this an enacting it without alerting the general population to some extent. Even a subtle one would be nice for this action. Imma go anarchist!! lol JK Not that far, but i feel for it now. (note the sarcasm, i dont wanna be flamed!!) SOOOO That me 2 cents there.
Originally posted by jarheadjock
uhhhh hello?!?! am i the only crazy guy here who smells "NWO Agenda"!??! LOL well i do!!! and this is an invasion of privacy. I am all for it to capture criminals but on a nationwide scale??? I think not, and with alot of things going on at once with what their monitoring for (terrorism, school shootings/planning, illegal downloading, pedophiles, etc.) it can be real easy to be branded as doing those activities when you dont do them. I feel uncomfortable even more that the US Gov is doing this an enacting it without alerting the general population to some extent. Even a subtle one would be nice for this action. Imma go anarchist!! lol JK Not that far, but i feel for it now. (note the sarcasm, i dont wanna be flamed!!) SOOOO That me 2 cents there.
That's wrong, of course. Making surveillance easier and faster gives law enforcement agencies of all stripes more reason to eschew old-fashioned police work in favor of spying. The telephone CALEA compliance deadline was in 2002, and since then the amount of court-ordered surveillance has nearly doubled from 2,586 applications granted that year, to 4,015 orders in 2006.
At the request of the FBI, the Federal Communications Commission is soon expected to require companies that provide certain kinds of Internet phone calls to enable law enforcement to conduct wiretapping, given court approval.
But it appears from its legal maneuvers that the FBI may also want to find a way to tap peer-to-peer calls, the ones that bypass the telephone system. And the FCC’s analysis of the FBI request suggests it might go along with a move to require wiretapping on any new Internet communications system.
Originally posted by Lexion
And, since I do nothing illegal on the internet, I should be worried ?
Why ?
Pondering,
Lex
Originally posted by Cale, LoganWhy do we keep letting this crap happen?
Originally posted by Leyla
Originally posted by hikix
This topic should be alot more popular then it is, this is the first time ive geard about this. Should i be concerned about getting heavily fined for downloading music????
Are you paying for the service? I agree flag away here!
Cale you don't get it, this is clearly a invasion of privacy. Would you want someone eves dropping on you during a purchase online or something? Or even talking to a friend?
[edit on 5/14/2007 by Leyla]
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
As far as I know, there is no mechanism by which everyone's internet activities can be readily monitored without a warrant, let alone the manpower needed to just hang out looking for people who might break the law.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Cale, LoganWhy do we keep letting this crap happen?
We keep letting this happen because all we do is sit in here and talk about it... No one is brave enough to even start a petition... So get used to it and toss your rights out the window...
Originally posted by enjoies05
But you should not do illegal things no matter if the government is watching you or not.