It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Seriously, if you have to eat your god, what do you prefer:
Some flat bread and grape juice or a hearty pasta dinner?
You be the judge ...
Originally posted by lombozo
The term "much ado about nothing" certainly comes to mind here.
For the record, I'm a god fearing man. When I was sick years ago, I did a whole lot of praying, and the God I choose to pray to came through for me. I don't preach to anybody, nor do I criticize anyone for their personal beliefs. If someone chooses to believe that god doesn't exist, who are we to criticize? I believe I've heard a term before that goes something like "Judge not, lest you be judged."
Let's face it, with the horrors that go on in this world on an increasing scale every day, there's a pretty strong argument about whether god does/does not exist.
Personally, I think this FSM thing is creative and tongue in cheek. Heck, here on BTS, I myself have created a thread called "The Perfect Religion!!!!!" See here:
www.belowtopsecret.com...
It is nothing more than my stupid humor. Harmless.
I know I'm about to get flamed for this, but let's face it, don't take yourself so seriously people.
Theology of transubstantiation
"Substance" here means what something is in itself. (For more on the philosophical concept, see Substance theory.) A hat's shape is not the hat itself, nor is its colour the hat, nor is its size, nor its softness to the touch, nor anything else about it perceptible to the senses. The hat itself (the "substance") has the shape, the colour, the size, the softness and the other appearances, but is distinct from them. While the appearances, which are referred to by the philosophical term accidents, are perceptible to the senses, the substance is not.
When at his Last Supper Jesus said: "This is my body", what he held in his hands still had all the appearances of bread: these "accidents" remained unchanged. However, the Roman Catholic Church believes that, when Jesus made that declaration,[1] the underlying reality (the "substance") of the bread was converted to that of his body. In other words, it actually was his body, while all the appearances open to the senses or to scientific investigation were still those of bread, exactly as before. The Church holds that the same change of the substance of the bread and of the wine occurs at the consecration of the Eucharist.[2]
Originally posted by JackofBlades
I think some of you are taking the FSM a little seriously. He isn't an actual religion, he is a point. Why is the idea of an omnipotent spaghetti god any less ridiculous than an omnipotent spirit god? There is no proof of either beyond belief.
If I choose to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, creator of mountains, trees and midgits, why should I be ridiculed? People believe in a god who created the same things and aren't allowed to be ridiculed.
And AryanWatcher, the Church of the FSM doesn't make fun of Christianity, it makes fun of organised religion in general.
I feel very lucky to have not been touched by it's noodly bits.
your old god will almost certainly take you back.