It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Inannamute
First of all you tell us that we have no proof, that we're crazy and should stop looking, now you're telling us to "keep trying"..
Which is it?
Originally posted by Diplomat
You guys obviously have no proof
Originally posted by Diplomat
So do you have copies of the FULL images? I would like to see the photos in their entirety if possible...
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Diplomat
You guys obviously have no proof
How is it obvious?
[edit on 12-5-2007 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by Diplomat
So how do you explain that? Is that photo also fake?
Originally posted by bsbray11
It doesn't matter. I'm still not seeing a good reason for those two photos to be contradictory, outside of someone intentionally messing with one to mislead people to the damage done to WTC7.
Originally posted by bsbray11
That's why we established relative times. Shadows indicate that the Sun was farther West when the second image, showing less damage, was taken. This was also pointed out on the first page of the thread.
Originally posted by Diplomat
In my opinion, the "shadow theories" are not sufficient enough to prove the times that the photos were taken.
You can tell because of the smoke from the fires...
Originally posted by Diplomat
I just know from experience that everything seems to be much more "brighter" in the morning, compared to the afternoon
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Why are the windows curved at #4+5 on the right side??
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Diplomat
I just know from experience that everything seems to be much more "brighter" in the morning, compared to the afternoon
Building 7 fell at 5:20 PM in September. It doesn't get that dark that fast.
The reason that side of the building is so dark is because sunlight isn't directly hitting it. There are neighboring buildings in the way and the Sun isn't in the right position. Instead, sunlight was directly hitting its South side at that point in time.
The image showing less damage shows a brighter West side of the building because the sunlight is hitting it directly, because the Sun has moved farther to the West, is closer to setting, and it's later in the day.
[edit on 12-5-2007 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by Diplomat
Well I don't know too much about analyzing photos or shadows, but to me it looks like the photo that shows less damage was taken in the morning or maybe around noon time, and the photo that shows more damage was taken later in the afternoon...possibly right around the time that the building actually collapsed.
[edit on 12-5-2007 by Diplomat]
Originally posted by Caustic LogicSo why is there NOT the damage in the shot that is clearly afternoon?