Possible UFO Flying near a B2

Originally posted by Mushroom Fields Forever
It's glare from the window from whatever aircraft they are filming from. How come one liners are treated worse than misleading titles?

I don't believe this is true. If you watch the movement of the camera/plane relative to the movement of the object/lensflare they don't seem to correspond with each other.

I think there was definitely something there, but this is very poor quality video. I would like to see the original. I don't necessarily think it's a UFO (maybe to you and I) but could be top secret light-refractive camouflage, or possible just very poor quality video. The movement of the object is not impossible for a fighter such as the F-22 Raptor - if the angle of the camera and the object were just right. Anyone got any idea of when this video was made?

[edit on 11-5-2007 by tyranny22]

Originally posted by Mayan2012
Oh and i think you'd better go back to school mate and ask your teacher if the word damn is a swear word,cuz where i live it sure as hell aint LOL

-Mayan

Hey maya guy, I hope you notice the ADMIN edited your post to remove the swearing and called it "childish." So, mate, maybe you're still in school.

Originally posted by ReeVeeR
Heya there.

The B-2 is only equiped with FLIR (Forward looking Infra-red) and I am not sure if it did record the UFO. That video was never broadcast. It would be very interesting if it was.

I stand corrected! But I'm darn sure that it was imaged using FLIR. And, needless to say, we'll NEVER get to see the footage. Must've been shoved into one of those UG vaults at Dulce for safe keeping!

Screen cap of "disk"

There is no shadow under the blur here. The sun angle hasn't changed, any shadow visible seconds later would be visible now. The "shadow" is caused as the reflection moves up the canopy.

It's not a disk. It's a blur reflected on the chase aircraft's canopy, just like the blurs in the previous shot. (Which also move relative to both aircraft and leave the screen)

Originally posted by ReeVeeR
Also, I have applied inverse image filters to all of the other shots, and they do NOT show up. This object shows up with inverse, emboss filters applied because it is a SOLID object that has sharp lines.

Nope.

I believe that the idea that only SOLID objects "emboss" is one of the biggest mistakes in photo "analysis". Contrast is what allows photo manipulation to define different areas to be affected. Bright reflections/smudges are affected. Faint ones, like in the previous shot, not so much.

To demonstrate. Here is a pic of the reflection of my lamp. It is not a SOLID object. But it inverts and embosses just fine.

The chase-plane camera is bobbing around and yet this "Reflection" smoothly glides into shot on a downward angle, makes a VERY sharp correction in direction and flies upwards.

The sharp upward angle is explained by the B-2 being in a banking turn. Aircraft lose altitude in an extended bank. Watch the B-2's right wing in comparison to the road. At the same instant that the "UFO" moves up, the B-2 starts dropping faster. The camera pans down to follow it, and Voilà! The object appears to move upwards.

Erm... the object is moving down while the plane is dropping down, the object then goes UP while the plane continues to drop. There is NO crazy bobbing around of the object, which would occur as the cameraman uses the bobbing camera. No way is this a reflection or anything of that nature. Total tripe.

Well ReeVeer its quite apparent that your reason for posting was merely to get subjective opinions as opposed to objective analysis.

You would do better posting to a website which welcomes such attitudes.

[edit on 13-5-2007 by Koka]

Back, and see the tread has been dropped

And that I have the video now

And that I need 20 posts to even post a new thread on here now. But I was somehow allowed back in the day?

Yes, this should be active again. I hope it is soon.

[edit on 12-7-2010 by ReeVeeR]

Yes, this should be active again. I hope it is soon.

reply to post by ReeVeeR


ReeVeeR.....

Thanks for posting that enjoyable video of the awesome B2!

Unfortunately, I can't see any UFO's there.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

It definately looks like something there just the way it comes in then gets the hell out of there very unusual suprised people say they can't see nothing.

i say it's a reflection on the inside of the canopy were the camera is,its from some kind of instrument light in the cabin.

Originally posted by merka
Its a smudge or sunspot on the canopy of the filming plane (or whatever is in front of the camera). You can see them in the footage just before and there are artifacts after that too.

Neither undeniable or hard to explain away.

[edit on 10-5-2007 by merka]

I was hoping for something a little more exciting, but you're exactly right. It was kind of obvious to me right away.

The movement of the questionable "object" is in relation to the camera. The "object" also moves upward as we start to see more of the top part of the bomber as thought the plane the camera is on is attempting to climb and pivot to the left for a better view of the bomber, hence giving the illusion that this "object" is moving away. I believe it is the position of the plane, and camera, which is moving.

Prior to the filming of the "object", you can see some misty/blurry reflections on the glass. I'm going to lean on that the object was nothing more then a reflection and that it's movement was due to the plane's climbing and pivoting to the left and that the camera's moving along the planes window gave an illusion of the reflection moving.

Sorry but it says your video is now unavailable, remvoed due to terms of use violation. I watched it once earlier on the thread that was closed but no luck on this thread.

Any chance you can get it back up, i agree it looked a little odd and very disc like but it also bounced around like a reflection would with even slight movements. Good find though, to bad those new omnifocus cameras aren't standard yet then we wouldn't have to specualte.

Also being by Groom lake is suspicious enough. As others have stated it could be simply military technologies that we are in the dark about, however i don't think they would be dumb enough to test these secret crafts at the same time they are flying and filming basic ones. Thats just asking for it to caught on film.