It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Possible UFO Flying near a B2

page: 1
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 10 2007 @ 03:07 AM
link   
Hello, I recently had a root around through all of my old disks and discovered something VERY interesting. I have already scripted the video, so no info is needed here. All you need to do is watch the video and make your mind up for yourself. In my opinion, this is the one of, if not the best video of a UFO out there. And the best thing is... nobody has ever commented on this or picked up on it and it must be 2 years old I reckon.

The thing that makes this video unique is the fact that it is caught on millitary camera, in the air, over Papoose lake and Groom lake! Undeniable and it cannot be explained away. See for yourself. Also, feel free to source this video and watch the original for yourselves. Contact the Discovery Channel (Military Channel) and have them send you a copy. I have already posted this to Coast to Coast, and they are researching it now.

Enjoy the video. Watch till' the end for a little analysis!

Look closely and you'll see the bubble around the craft!




And here are some pics to whet your appetite!

THE UFO:


INVERTED VERSION OF UFO


PAPOOSE LAKE:


[edit on 10-5-2007 by ReeVeeR]
Admin edite: Changed title to more accurately reflect content

[edit on 5-10-2007 by Springer]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 03:27 AM
link   
Well, it is hard to make out exactly what the "object" is. Just looks like a blurry smudge. I guess it could be a craft, doesn't mean it is Alien though...

I don't understand how people can watch footage like that of the B2 Bomber, which had it's maiden flight way back in 1989, and still don't think that today in 2007 we do not have technology far more advanced than the B2 that we actually discovered on our own. I can't even begin to imagine what kind of toys our military has these days...

Everyone assumes that these high-tech crafts must be Aliens, but I don't think it is ridiculous at all to assume that our Military has technology that would absolutely blow most of our minds. Nazis were trying to make "disc" crafts back in like the 40's or 50's. It is 2007 people, do you really think that we aren't building our own high-tech discs now?



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 03:36 AM
link   
Thats pretty much right Diplomat, the fact that Alians might not be in these craft isnt thought of too much and more consideration to this thought should be given then currently is.

But I think that we need a higher quality version of the video first. It would be good to get hold of the original footage that was on the Discovery channel. That would make it a little easier to work out what it actualy is.

-fm



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 03:52 AM
link   
Its a smudge or sunspot on the canopy of the filming plane (or whatever is in front of the camera). You can see them in the footage just before and there are artifacts after that too.

Neither undeniable or hard to explain away.

[edit on 10-5-2007 by merka]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 04:01 AM
link   
Very hard to see but t looks like reflection of a cloud/sunspot and moves over the curve of the canopy..In the beginning there is something simular with a small cloud reflection.

Forgot the add, that this is one of my favorite planes. And hard to imagine what they have now, and not publicly known. Lucky pilots though, flying in such planes.

[edit on 10/5/2007 by Cygnific]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 04:03 AM
link   
But smudges or sunspots don't have shadows under them do they? This is clearly a solid object and not a smudge.
Compare the rest of the artifacts with the ufo. They don't even come close to it.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 04:12 AM
link   
Well we can all argue all night about what that "smudge" might be. It most likely is just a reflection off the glass or something like that, but if it really is a spaceship... then get me a close-up of it, otherwise it's a waste of time wondering what that small fuzzy smudge is...



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 08:15 AM
link   
IMO it looks like a ufo and reacts like one too> It comes in frame... stop at 1:22



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat

Everyone assumes that these high-tech crafts must be Aliens,



Where does the OP say "ALIENS"???

Diplomat, your posts are becoming trite and predictable in their banality.



edit cut quote length

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Stale Cracker]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 08:33 AM
link   
From the short segment it appears to be coming into the frame then change angle and depart. The camera appears to be centered on the B2, and the plane the camera is in appears to be smoothly banking with the B2. If it was window glare it SHOULD move in a constant direction and speed acroos the frame, not come in, alter trajectory, then depart frame.


It's either a videographic anomaly or an actual UFO.

Hey, maybe an UFS!!! (unidentified flying smudge
) let's compromise diplomat



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 08:44 AM
link   
I was looking at that and I suggest you look at the footage between 3:08 and 3:05, this shows a semitransparent spot, that obviously isn't a space craft, but it behaves similar to that other suspected anomaly that occured between 4:22 and 4:18. I won't rule it out completley though, it should be open to further examination.

And yes, the military has lots of toys that the public isn't aware of.

edit: I forgot to mention that I liked the bg music, do you know where I can get it? I don't really wanna rip it off that video.

[edit on 10-5-2007 by laiguana]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:20 PM
link   
I don't think there's much here, truly. It certainly is NOT the best UFO video EVER. UNDENIABLE. It's just another smeary, barely discernable something that may or may not be solid. I wish people wouldn't hype their titles like this.

Think about it. If the title were something like: "Looks like a UFO checking out a B-2" then, okay, let's take a look. But the BEST EVER. Gimme a break. It's barely discernable. bottom 10%.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:02 PM
link   
The title of this thread made me think, "Yes, finally we have the undeniable proof" but unfortunately it did not play out that way. When I think of what undeniable means I think of no room for other possible explanations or absolute clarity and identification. You may have something there but already there are a handful of possible explanations therefore I do not think it is undeniable in anyway whatsoever.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:33 PM
link   
Lamest title ever. I see some smudge, and no bubble.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:40 PM
link   
It's glare from the window from whatever aircraft they are filming from. How come one liners are treated worse than misleading titles?



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:40 PM
link   
The object most likely is one of the chase planes who are taking the film. Notice the film cuts between different views? There probably were three chase planes getting film from three different angles. Notice in the still pic the white object appears to have a conventional vertical stabilizer just as a T-38 might have.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:42 PM
link   
IMO, this is a reflection on the canopy of the plane filming the bomber, the reflection's movement is due to a combination of the planes movement and a shakey camera, UNDENIABLE.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:44 PM
link   
No kidding about the title. Gives the impression of "I want to believe." Not that there's anything wrong with such an attitude, but it doesn't prop up the mediocre evidence.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stale Cracker
Hey, maybe an UFS!!! (unidentified flying smudge
) let's compromise diplomat


Damn it, you beat me to it.


Sorry for 1-liner.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Sigh

Again I get sucked in with a misleading title to a thread, and all I get to see is a reflection on the chase planes canopy. There aughta be a law about extremely misleading titles.

I want my 2 minutes back!!!!




top topics



 
9
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join