Drone UFO pics on C2C

I don't see this being anything other than a model. It is either tethered or being flown by remote, but I doubt that it is aerodynamic.

The asymmetrical fins with Klingon writing are cute, but this thing is easily less than two meters across.

Why it is hanging around his house is baffling.

Apparently whatever it is, it is looking for a photo op.

The fact that this is the only guy who ever sees it tells me that he made it.

Is he related to the old Swiss guy who passes off spinning trash can lids and hub caps as flying saucers?

Dude, read the whole thread! Everything was covered already. And read Chads remarks as well, you have some "facts" wrong (he was not the only one to see it). You are aware that you are not the only one posting here, right?

Originally posted by Areal51 What would be good is if people stick to what they know.

This post impresses me so much I gave Area51 five stars. I like (his?) attitude, and it serves as an example for the rest of us.

i found this ... something similar ? what do you guys think ?

www.ufoevidence.org...

Originally posted by child of light
i found this ... something similar ? what do you guys think ?
www.ufoevidence.org...

Good find! Yes it could be similar. Any more info or background on this object?

[edit on 17-5-2007 by Latitude]

Hi Child Of Light,

That looks very similair, really good find!. The rods at the top look a little longer but apart from that it looks identical.

This was taken in 1999, some 8 years prior to the one we are looking at now. I really admire the guys that are recreating the craft using 3d modelling on this thread, it's amazing what can be created with a little time but looking at the original images again they must have spent a LOT of time creating this thing (If it is a hoax).

Normally I can look at images and decide fairly quickly if it is a hoax or not, with this one I really don't know. The pictures really look convincing but the guy himself is not bringing anything else forward and if he sees it quite a lot we should be seeing video by now. It's like you can mock up images to make it look real but when you get down to the nitty gritty he can't deliver.

The History Channel just aired a show on magnetism which has a craft similar to the C2C craft.

I have the pics of the History Channel craft in thisC2C Craft: Fake Pics of REAL Project? thread
and are curious if anyone knows a NASA project like this...

[edit on 17-5-2007 by Watchful1]

Sorry I have noticed something suspect in picture above: Shouldn't a
sort of "wire" be expected seen above the protuding arm? Possibly
it could be hidden in this perspective, but not very likely ? .....

If the cam shot was from vertical below of course it couldn't have been seen, but this shot is slightly from beside vertical line showing at least
the hook above arm engaged to central cylinder.

This is the first and only suspecting detail I have found in this case -
hope I am wrong in some way. Of course the wire could be hidden if
it is placed a little "asymmetric" - and if fake such a mistake is not
expected.

Since I know this is a huge thread and most people simply don't have the time to read 400+ posts I would like to point out that this object has been declared a rendered 3D image by every single imaging expert I have shown it to and spoken to about it.

David Biedny (one of the fathers of Photo Shop, imaging instructor at YALE, ILM veteran, etc... Google his name), Jeff Ritzmann, two other ILM veterans who hold degrees in computer sciences/arts and have many years experience in this field, and a handful of computer science engineers.

One thing to keep in mind is the latest movies we see with incredible graphics (CGI) were made with technology that is 2 or more years old. That means there is technology out on the desktops of CGI professionals that we (general public) haven't seen the produce of yet.

While I have been assured this is not that spectacular of rendering I think it's wise to point out the above fact since it appears there is going to be more of these type images headed our way in the future.

The only reason I am not labeling this thread with my usual **HOAX** is because the original poster/thread author is not the person trying to "sell" this to us.

While it is fun to speculate what something like this could be, I for one will trust in the people who know what it is.

Springer...

[edit on 5-17-2007 by Springer]

This is plain and simple CGI. I call this fake.
This is totally out of a sci-fi movie.
Sorry, but this is a hoax, i'm 99% sure of that.

Great Find, ETD! Can you share with us WHICH SF movie it is that you are 99% it is from?

This would clear up a lot of confusion and validate the CG/hoax completely.

Thanks again...

Hellow

At firt instant I´ll present me, I´m a computer technical and 2D graphical designer since ten years
and it looks great to me to participe on this forum. I´ve been reading all this posts since the
beginning and I confess that was a lucky guy who got to post before me at final patience was
needed!!
The eternal battle among sceptics and open minds, you look to me like trojans and greeks shooting
stones each side lol
Well, I not define me like a sceptic or a open mind, but someone that follows the light
of good sence. I´ve been studing the ufo phenomenon since some years, always taking care to refuse
any case that have no logical suport and reached this final point:
•Really exist something there and I don´t need to inspire me in any photo or film presumption to
be an hoax like this case (You will not reach a final point about this photos!), cause some of
my friends and me have witnessed OvNIs including oficial and irrefutable cases involving the
aviation from my country. I give to the creatures that pilot this crafts reason in not to maintain
direct contact with us, cause we know sincerely that the human being have NO MATURATION to receive such advanced
technology like this, me and with sure them think observing the human race behavior, we would
use it for make destructive weapons and destroy like terrorists do and like we´re doing with our
planet!
I feel sorry about this.

Originally posted by October
Normally I can look at images and decide fairly quickly if it is a hoax or not, with this one I really don't know. The pictures really look convincing but the guy himself is not bringing anything else forward and if he sees it quite a lot we should be seeing video by now. It's like you can mock up images to make it look real but when you get down to the nitty gritty he can't deliver.

Well, don't write Chad off just yet. I have heard recently that he is now working with a very well known ufo researcher to get video of this object.

If this thing were proven to be a real object, what would happen to all the imaging experts who proclaimed this thing to be a CGI hoax? Would they be banned?

Originally posted by Latitude
If this thing were proven to be a real object, what would happen to all the imaging experts who proclaimed this thing to be a CGI hoax? Would they be banned?

I suggest the scenario you propose is highly unlikely. However, just to go with the idea here for a moment, I just read the Terms & Conditions. There are actually several areas where these sorts of things are discussed and I read them all. There may be other areas that I missed, but I tried to be comprehensive about it. You can find various bits of information in the FAQs, in the Handbook, in About ATS, and in the footers to many pages.

Nowhere does it say that a user will be banned for being wrong. Given the cavalier fashion in which users indulge themselves in unproven conspiracies, unsupported beliefs, religious dogma, and illogical arguments, if users were banned for these activities, then the boards would be devoid of most posts.

If the experts here are proven wrong, I suppose you could legitimately leave a caustic remark to that effect. Doing so in advance of the fact, like you just did, probably won't earn you many points. (Well, one, by default.) In any case, don't hold your breath.

Originally posted by schuyler
[If the experts here are proven wrong, I suppose you could legitimately leave a caustic remark to that effect. Doing so in advance of the fact, like you just did, probably won't earn you many points. (Well, one, by default.) In any case, don't hold your breath.

I left no caustic remark. I asked a simple question and did not point out anybody specifically. In my opinion, it's a valid question. Where in my post do you see anything remotely caustic?

Originally posted by Latitude

I left no caustic remark. I asked a simple question and did not point out anybody specifically. In my opinion, it's a valid question. Where in my post do you see anything remotely caustic?

what would happen to all the imaging experts who proclaimed this thing to be a CGI hoax? Would they be banned?

That's caustic. I cannot for the life of me believe that was an innocent question. No big deal, really, so chill. It's not worth getting upset over.

Now, the real question is, did I answer yours? Do yu understand now that you won't get banned if you are wrong?

Originally posted by schuyler
Now, the real question is, did I answer yours? Do yu understand now that you won't get banned if you are wrong?

Yes, you answered it quite well. Thanks

I would suggest visually enhancing the image in the 2nd photo and look up about about 12:00 O' clock high and look at those two dot visuals above this pod.Enhance them and you will get a bigger picture.

Originally posted by menguard
I would suggest visually enhancing the image in the 2nd photo and look up about about 12:00 O' clock high and look at those two dot visuals above this pod.Enhance them and you will get a bigger picture.

Well..if you could really enhance them somehow, you'd see that its just dust particles on the camera lens.

On the question of experts being wrong, I must say that it was an immature remark. Experts here, do not force everyone to accept their opinion as facts, they are here to help. They are here to help uncover the truth, not to TELL the truth.

Some amount of skepticism is necessary in the search for truth. We don't expect a hard believer to provide an honest and neutral opinion, as he has already made up his mind and won't budge his 'beliefs' even when tons of counter-evidence is provided. We see him attacking the person instead.

I'd be the happiest man on ATS if this is PROVEN as a real alien craft.

If you really want this to be true, go and prove it so.