posted on May, 8 2007 @ 03:57 AM
Actually, it comes to my mind that name calling on a forum is much like an actual altercation with another physical presence. Whomsoever is so
limited in the depth, length and width of their philosophy or their current argument and throws the first punch is the real loser. And so it is with
the term "Sheeple" ... Or any other pejorative, for that matter.
If you have a stated position and are unable to defend it without resorting to name calling, then the big "L" for "Loser" goes on your forehead,
as far as I'm concerned. And I, probably like many others, tend to not be involved in those types of discussions. So ... In a way, it tends to
weaken the ATS community when, for your lack of skill or knowledge, you drop down to calling "PEOPLE", "SHEEPLE".
It is childish, tawdry, and shows a clear lack of ability on your part to partake in the very debate system you are trying to involve yourself in.
After all, resorting to name calling and physical altercation is the way of folks who just don't have what it takes to be effective.
I don't think we should ban the word, but when someone uses it in the heat of debate, or in anger at someone else for not being pursuaded to their
point of view, the person who uses it should get a big purple petunia on their signature block so that everyone else knows they can't hack it or run
with the big dogs.