posted on May, 14 2007 @ 07:59 AM
So, the only way to keep the US Gov. from being implicated is to admit that WTC7 was a CD? Then why haven't they done so? Is it because it would
invite comparisons with WTC1 and WTC2?
And also remember that they only started warning people off at noon at the earliest. That gives them a maximum of 5 hours to rig the building. Also,
if they would have had to wait for the fires to go out before planting the charges they surely wouldn't have had to worry about the fires in the
building spreading due to the building collapsing to its damaged side. You can't have it both ways.
Also the rationale that the building would be brought down to syop looters getting at important docs is flawed. Why would a CD desroy more paper than
a collapse? They couldn't have been sure either way. Look at all the paper (and passports) that survived the towers' collapse/CD. The reason no
papers escaped WT7 is that it was cleared of anything sensitive before 9/11.