reply to post by EdWardMD
This whole idea is based solely on grossly inaccurate and misinformed ideas made from questionable observations. Mini-nukes? No way. Had there been
at least one "mini-nuke", people would have noticed. Are you aware of how nuclear weapons work? If you were to set off even the smallest nuke
permitted by physics, the resulting blast would have shattered windows of ALL surrounding buildings for blocks around, and this blast would have
occurred BEFORE the collapse of either building. However in close observations of the WTCs before collapse, we see exterior columns that bend inwards
prior to collapse. I know of no explosives that can cause this to happen.
www.youtube.com...
Also seen here just before collapse and the debris ejections:
No explosives are capable of this and also gives more evidence of no bombs.
There would have been radiation burns (Thermal, Beta, Gamma), blast damage, and a tell tale mushroom cloud. Also detonation of ANY nuclear device
would result in a large amount of nuclear fallout, especially if it was detonated in a building. The entire lower and upper Manhattan area would have
been exposed to large amounts of fallout and you cannot hide nuclear fallout, no matter how small the device was. That and debris would have been
catapulted blocks away, not paper but steel and concrete pieces weighing hundreds of pounds. The sheer force of the even the smallest nuke would have
been obvious. Not to mention the sound of a nuclear device going off.
As for the tritium levels found, you really ought to research what tritium is used in:
Most commonly used in EXIT signs, wrist watches, glow in the dark objects, and small arms sites, to name a few.
As for what happened to the debris and steel in the pile, there is another alternate, and mundane, explanation.
Its called oxidation. Its what happens when things burn. Steel rusting is actually a very slow burn. It uses up oxygen to rust the steel. In fact when
a large amount of iron rusts in a large pile it heats up. When iron is heated up and water is poured on it, an exothermic reaction occurs. What is
produced is hydrogen and Fe3O4, or rust. The hydrogen also reacts with steam and is also a corrosive agent. Considering that a sizable amount of iron
was heated up b the fires, and subsequently buried, it would have stayed hot. Heated iron will rust faster. Pouring water on it, especially seawater,
will cause even more rusting. Rust produces more heat, and its a cycle. Sulfur released from hundreds of tons of decaying drywall crushed in the pile
actually lowers the melting point of steel as well, and also reacts with water to form sulfuric acid, which is extremely corrosive. In a nutshell, the
conditions in the pile were extremely corrosive for weeks and got worse over time. The two most abundant oxidizing sources were water and oxygen. Add
heat and its one hell of a corrosive environment. If you would like to learn more about it you can see here:
Iron Burns
Mundane Sources of "molten iron"
Oh testicular cancer caused by radiation? Ahh no. I do not see radiation as a main cause or even as a mentioned suspected source. Chemical exposure I
do see. But not radiation. It seems TC is more of a family history/HIV/Age/undescended testicle. Now what SHOULD have been apparent after any nuclear
detonation and later on is numerous cases of radiation sickness, hair falling out, etc, plus thyroid cancers more apparent with radiation exposure.