Question about cars, I want an answer. No more messing around.

What are you saying??

A shockwave of the towers falling or what???

Originally posted by ThichHeaded
What are you saying??

A shockwave of the towers falling or what???

The shock wave from the bombs used to take down the world trade
center, (possibly).

But then again if that was the case then people around the area would have been in no better shape then the cars were...

So... there is no answers for your question, yet.

So, whatever did it, had to "differentiate" between people, papers, etc., and cars/trucks/vans. Right?

For all the official story people watching this post. Notice how hard it is to answer a simple question?

How hard it is to answer this particular question, ironically none of the Official story people are trying to chime on here... Why is that??? Where they all at???

I do want an answer to this.. The only plausible answer to this right now is EMP or a mini nuke or something. There is nothing else to be included into this question the landing gear that feel near Park Pl wouldn't cause all those cars to burn up.

So now.. The question is this....

What made all these cars in the past posts end up they way they are.. I still want a simple answer that can be reproduced...

I believe the official story is a lie, but I am thinking a logical explanation for these cars is a gas leak or explosion.

Wasn't there firefighters prior to the planes striking investigating a gas leak about 10 blocks from the WTC towers? That film of the Naudet Brothers, the firefighters look to be investigating a gas leak.

Here is an example of CAR's on Fire and a Gas Leak

Gas Leak

Those are all some very interesting images I must say.

Why isn't that minivan burning up like the others?, if this is all leading to where I think it is...

To be honest i don't think there will be anyone on here or in the world for that matter who could answer a sure answer to this question.

Sure some people could answer different theories, you can even think you are 100% sure your theory is correct but the fact of the matter is, no one knows because there was no investigations at the time of it happening on what happened...

As far as I am aware.

But it does look like something was blown up around there hint hint....

Dr Bill Deagle (google his name) has made some pretty accurate pointed observations about what happened to WTC1 and 2.

He in effect stated

- 4th Generation MicroNukes were used in addition to Thermate in the destruction of the world trade centers. Emitting a heat pulse lasting nanoseconds at approximately 4 million degrees, it would easily have caused objects at a great distance to simply catch fire, and have caused the pillars to turn to ash -

He further stated in effect

- The destruction of WTC1 and 2 were subcontract jobs employing the expertise of Mossad nuclear technicians, and Russian GRU agents. -

Here are a few more images to help with progress of this post.







This image above.. WTC Complex is bottom left across the street where the box thing is on the street.

This is as good as as all images ever seen on 9/11 with cars.. If there are any others.. I would like to see them.

I am going to steal some points from Sauron's post here and add it to here.

I am going to do highlights of his post since i am lazy and not going to read the whole thing.

===================
===========
Below is nothing from me, all from the post above.. I would quote all of the posts but that would look crappy so I am just going to paste it.
===========
===================

1. Why is the wire mesh fencing behind the cars not effected? The doors on the patrol car are clearly melted, yet the wire fence still has a lot of tension on it?

2. Why is the bridges frame structures paint clearly unaffected by the inferno? If you look closely the paint is still clearly gray. I see no smoke stain, discoloring, darkening

3. Why is there no ash under where the vehicles are parked. In fact the roads surface is clearly unaffected. If the fire was to melt the car doors, tiers, bonnets surely a tar rock surface would melt

-------------------------

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...
here is a part from this post here

► Paul Curran Fire Patrolman (F.D.N.Y.) 12/18/01
"At that time I went back to the north tower again, and they were stretching a line. A lot of car fires erupted. All of a sudden cars were blowing up everywhere.

I ran into the lobby cause I had no idea what had happened and the cops that were in there were telling everybody get out, get out, get out. Where are you gonna go? Stuff's blowing up.

As I was running up Vesey, the first car blew up on me on the corner of Vessey and the West Side Highway. That set my turnout coat on fire, that set my hair on fire, and that set my feet on fire. I kept running. I got news for you, those turn out coats need to be called burn out coats, cause this thing caught up in flames.

So there were still cars parked on the street that were completely independent of that. Three cars blew up on me, stuff was being thrown. I went home all bruised that day. Thank God it was only bruises. I just ran into this park along with a bunch of other people, and stuff was still blowing up...

Stuff is still blowing up behind me, as I'm running. I can hear stuff exploding. I could hear rumbling, the street under me was moving like I was in an earthquake.

► Ronald Coyne E.M.T. (E.M.S.) 12/28/01
"...I saw the building start to topple...I tried to run as fast as I could...and by the time it took me to break the back window of the SUV, my safety coat was already on fire. My socks were on fire.

I was just covered with burns and bruises, and I couldn't breathe at all."

----------------------------

There is more in that post.. But this can get us to further thinking.

I think its something we don't want to admit to because we don't wanna be considered top whackjob.. But selfless has been half ass hinting to it since this post start.. And I know at least 1 other in this post definitely agrees with selfless and myself.. Apparently we don't have the balls to actually come out and say what it is...

But lets see if we can come up with a normal reason 1st before re resort to the one some of us are thinking.

Originally posted by XR500Final
- 4th Generation MicroNukes were used in addition to Thermate in the destruction of the world trade centers. Emitting a heat pulse lasting nanoseconds at approximately 4 million degrees, it would easily have caused objects at a great distance to simply catch fire, and have caused the pillars to turn to ash -

Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Why isn't that minivan burning up like the others?, if this is all leading to where I think it is...

And why aren't all the papers burning too if a "nuke" did that??

The pillars didn't turn to ash.

[edit on 29-4-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]

Exactly - cars aren't the exception to the laws of combustion.

Either debris fell on them, or they were torched. If nukes were used, they wouldn't selectively burn cars.

Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Exactly - cars aren't the exception to the laws of combustion.

Either debris fell on them, or they were torched. If nukes were used, they wouldn't selectively burn cars.

But if you look at the photograph above, you can see that the cars that were torched have no debris on them... by the time it would have taken to remove all the debris that could have caused these cars to set on fire, they would have also moved the cars from that area so you wouldn't even be seeing cars in the photo.


And also, keep in mind that the debris had to of been from when the planes hit the towers and not when it fell down or else for debris to make it that far ''2 blocks away'' there would be no cars to look at, it would be meters high of building debris just like the surrounding area of the block the world trade center buildings were.

And if that were the case 2 blocks away, the whole block it self would have been pretty much destroyed and there would be no survivors in that area and well there were many on that day who survived 2 blocks away.

And when you see the buildings coming down you see people get swept by the smoke a few blocks away from the world trade center buildings and yet they did not burn and they did not receive any debris onto them so how can you explain magical debris that only magically made it's way to certain cars?



[edit on 29-4-2007 by selfless]

Now, this is what i call debris.




And that's as far as the debris went, the surrounding area of the building it self and if the building fell from structural failure alone, it would have indeed fallen a few blocks away but yet it didn't which doesn't give much credit to the official story....

Yeah, no one was able to answer this question yet...

Originally posted by selfless
Now, this is what i call debris.

And that's as far as the debris went, the surrounding area of the building it self and if the building fell from structural failure alone, it would have indeed fallen a few blocks away but yet it didn't which doesn't give much credit to the official story....

Wow 110 stories of steel and concrete dust all in one neat little pile (Er, I mean two neat little piles)

[edit on 30-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]

Originally posted by In nothing we trust

Wow 110 stories of steel and concrete dust all in one neat little pile (Er, I mean two neat little piles)

[edit on 30-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]

Yeah, isn't it ironic that this is consistent with controlled demolition and not free fall from structural failure.

Originally posted by selfless

Originally posted by In nothing we trust

Wow 110 stories of steel and concrete dust all in one neat little pile (Er, I mean two neat little piles)

Yeah, isn't it ironic that this is consistent with controlled demolition and not free fall from structural failure.

It's what all the smart people already know.

The dummies still believe that boxcutter wielding arabs caused all of this.

And the dummies outnumber the smarties, so it doesn't really matter that we know.
And those who did this, already know that the dummies don't care, so they aren't worried.

Now that's what I call Ironic.

[edit on 30-4-2007 by In nothing we trust]