It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ufo over France, multiple vids/ Update 16MAY2007 (additional Video)

page: 7
35
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 17 2007 @ 11:12 AM
link   
men y'all paranoids megaupload is a safe website just like rapidshare or yousendit or filefront are



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Can someone please re-upload the new footage to another file host? The Megaupload links are both saying "Files are temporarily unavailable"

www.rapidshare.com

www.rapidshare.de

Or maybe just reupload them to megaupload again?


Thanks

[edit on 17-5-2007 by quick]



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by quick
Can someone please re-upload the new footage to another file host? The Megaupload links are both saying "Files are temporarily unavailable"

www.rapidshare.com

www.rapidshare.de

Or maybe just reupload them to megaupload again?


Thanks

[edit on 17-5-2007 by quick]


there you go>>> mediafire link



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 01:11 PM
link   
Thanks themaster1!! Great footage and very high quality videos! This craft is strange it is 100% featureless...

Great work, getting the videos from the guy Drexon!

Thanks

EDIT: Just uploaded to rapidshare.com for another mirror.

rapidshare.com...

[edit on 17-5-2007 by quick]



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Found the videos also here (streaming):

www.disclose.tv...

www.disclose.tv...



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 02:42 PM
link   
I was convinced until the close up on the 2nd video, you can see the CGI element sliding all over the place in relation to the background..obvious giveaway of 3d tracking (and badly done at that).

File as fake.



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildone106
I was convinced until the close up on the 2nd video, you can see the CGI element sliding all over the place in relation to the background..obvious giveaway of 3d tracking (and badly done at that).

File as fake.


Are you basing this off of the downloaded video or the streaming one from above? I see nothing of what you are describing in the downloaded version.



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Hey,

Its the 2nd video link above, around :50 when the camera starts moving there's slight movement associated with the CG not locked to the background sky. Its very hard to track in rough camera movement like this.



Originally posted by netobrev

Originally posted by wildone106
I was convinced until the close up on the 2nd video, you can see the CGI element sliding all over the place in relation to the background..obvious giveaway of 3d tracking (and badly done at that).

File as fake.


Are you basing this off of the downloaded video or the streaming one from above? I see nothing of what you are describing in the downloaded version.



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 05:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by wildone106
Hey,

Its the 2nd video link above, around :50 when the camera starts moving there's slight movement associated with the CG not locked to the background sky. Its very hard to track in rough camera movement like this.

I'mmm.. not noticing anything. I've looked through these videos so many times it's ridiculous now, and I've yet to discover Anything suggesting motion tracking.

As far as I'm concerned, this thing was actually hanging there in the sky, which isn't all that improbable since most of the people on the Alien & UFOs section Have seen a UFO, and I'm one of them.

The first UFO I saw, which I've been pretty skeptical talking about, was more or less exactly the size and shape of this UFO. It was dark, yet transparent almost to the degree you couldn't see it. I remember thinking to myself "Even if I'd run up to someone and point towards it, they wouldn't see it". Heck, I only noticed something was there because it did some weird flash in my peripheral vision as it was going over a nearby light pole. I would Not have noticed it flying there if it wasn't for that.

Anyway, the thing had a dark shade to it, much like this one, but as I said it was semi-transparent. Much like this one you couldn't make out the surface or any features, instead I saw what appeared to be a blackish.. mist covering the UFO, "boiling" with the huge "bubbles" that span across it making it semi-transparent, the bubbles were the transparent parts that is. It flew in an extremely steady motion at about a three story buildings height and at about running speed with no noise what-so-ever. I was scared, but I decided to follow it, staying close to a couple of bushes that were nearby. As I followed it it became harder and harder to see, and as it passed into, from my point of view, a bright pink part of the sky (the sun was setting), it created the illusion it was going in 'behind' the pink part, meaning that whatever made it invisible in the first place only made it more invisible the more light it had to dispense. And that's just the first semi-cloaked UFO I saw.



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 05:47 PM
link   
well that was interesting
Man I like this site
thanks and thanks again.
they are talking too us...they are revealing themselves because the american secret military will not
cool



posted on May, 17 2007 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Drexon, Thanks and great job !
I finally managed to download the files after some problems.

About the file named ovni_2, i can say that its not CG or any composite work. It looks like there is something really in the sky. Now the question is what it is. Whether its ET or only T.

I dont see any cords or editing artifacts to remove the cord, so can't say if its a balloon. If its a balloon, its very huge. It also does not sway in wind like a balloon. But from the trees one can say that not much wind was blowing.

I cant say much about the one with 'borders'(ovni_1). The border is most apparent now even without any enhancement. Why is there a border, if its real ? Anyway the videographer providing a better video is a positive point. He appears honest by doing this.

I'll try to analyze more and post my results, if I find anything of interest.



posted on May, 21 2007 @ 06:09 PM
link   
I can't believe this thread died so fast. o_O Is this NOT the greatest UFO footage that's surfaced in, what... decades, or what?

Anyway, some new info that might be of interest. Apparently there was some cloaking action going on that we haven't heard of yet.

When I asked Anamkhai about why the UFO is all black he said:

"it was very dark, maybe not as dark as on the video, but couldn't see very well but we could see a kind of halo around the ship, you can see it if you zoom it a lot like some white effect a bit like when it's hot on a road and it makes a little water effect with the sun."

Which in itself is pretty interesting if you ask me, and yes, you Do see the white halo on coursanges video, however me and Rocksolidbrain just assumed it was a camera effect. Edit: Just watched the HQ version again and the white halo isn't as obvious as it was on the YouTube version, just saying.

I've invited Anamkhai to come talk to us about the sighting, and he's said he's said he's going to get to it eventually and has apologized over and over again for being so slow about it. I believe he'll be here eventually though, so this is not the end of this thread.


Oh, and here are the video links again:


Originally posted by Drexon
*** Update *** New footage!

Well our good friend Anamkhai has been busy but as I said, patience is a virtue, and the payoff for all our waiting? The videos to Two of the three ones in high quality.


www.megaupload.com... The first one with the lengthiest footage, it even has a few extra seconds of tape witha close-up of the UFO showing... landing gear?

www.megaupload.com... The video from 'Anamkhai'. Lots of creds to him for supplying us with both of these.


If you're experiencing any troubles downloading, please say so and hopefully I or someone else will upload it somewhere else.


[edit on 21-5-2007 by Drexon]



posted on May, 26 2007 @ 07:07 AM
link   
Come on people, this deserves a lot more attention that it's currently getting (0).


Should we try to contact someone in that village? Would that even be possible..? I know Sweden has a 'white pages' type service where everyones phone numbers are listed, but france?



posted on May, 26 2007 @ 07:11 AM
link   
If you mention this video: www.youtube.com...

It seems to be fake. Look at the last seconds; camera and craft move together.



posted on May, 26 2007 @ 07:32 AM
link   
I cant see the videos. I have downloaded both links and still cant see the videos. I believe that my computer does not support quick time. Could anyone post the vids say on youtube or something?

Thanks



posted on May, 26 2007 @ 08:25 AM
link   
The said videos Are on YouTube, just look at the original post. What's happened now is that we've obtained the high quality versions, and yes, they are in qucktime format, a program which is free.

The videos do however work in Media Player Classic, a non-intrusive program which only requires you start the .exe. Here's a link to that program:

www.free-codecs.com...

And here's a screen from the footage not shown in the original YouTube video...





posted on May, 26 2007 @ 09:05 AM
link   
Drexon, you are talking baout this video right?
www.youtube.com...
If yes, please watch the last seconds. What do you think?



posted on May, 26 2007 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Yeah that's the video. And what I think is that it's a genuine video of a UFO that is somewhat obscured!

I don't really know what else to say except that it looks absolutely real and that nothing so far indicates fake or even the possibility of a fake. In essense it's a really good video of a disc shaped UFO.



posted on May, 27 2007 @ 08:58 AM
link   
My personal insight is that this video is a well done fake. As I said before, untli the last seconds it is convincing (look like a blimp though) but in last seconds the craft moves, and the coordination of the movement of craft and camre makes it not convincing anymore.



posted on May, 27 2007 @ 09:09 AM
link   
I actually see nothing of the sort. The blur around the edges of it is consistent with blur around the vegetation (in that shot), the zoom blurs from time to time and is perfectly synced with the blur of the surroundings. There's actually nothing that immediately suggest fake with this video, which is why it's so interesting.

Do you guys think we should start contacting some CGI specialists?




top topics



 
35
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join