Conspiracy: VA Tech Massacre to Divert Attention from Impeachment of Cheney

Conspiracy: VA Tech Massacre to Divert Attention from Impeachment of Cheney

blog.washingtonpost.com

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), the most liberal of the Democratic presidential candidates in the primary field, declared in a letter sent to his Democratic House colleagues this morning that he plans to file articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney.

[...]

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to impeach the president, vice president and "all civil Officers of the United States" for "treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Sources tell the Sleuth that in light of the mass killings at Virginia Tech Monday, Kucinich's impeachment plans have been put on hold. There will be no action this week, they say.

(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Virginia Tech Shooter: Cho Seung-Hui's Written Plays
VaTech Gunman Contacted NBC News During Massacre

[edit on 19-4-2007 by khunmoon]

Let me say for a starter, I'm not a person to see conspiracies everywhere, but this news just struck me. More over it struck even harder when I after extensive searches find out this notice in Washington Post is THE ONLY place it is published.

Impeachment formalities on the way on the day of the massacre, published the following day, to be sure to drown in the grisly details of the shooting. Could that be coincidence?

Now, I don't wanna go that far as CTs around the Port Arthur massacre of Tasmania in 1996, where CT's claimed it to be a job by the anti-gun lobby, that Martin Bryant with his shooting skills and mental disabilities never would have been able to carry out the misdeed.

There are similarities. Both Cho and Bryant started there killing spree by shooting people they had a personal grudge against. Both went on to other locations to continue their killings. And both had a remarkable high score of leathal shots of the total amount fired.

What do we know about the first two victims of Cho's rampage? I haven't even noticed their names puplished.

Could this really be a diversion? Plenty of fuzzy details and ends that don't add up.

Like this "multi-media package" he send to NBC. Until late yesterday i took for granted it was send electronical from his mobile phone. However when I learned he went to the postoffice between the killings to send it by snail-mail, something fishy I then sense. Furthermore NBC didn't pay attention to the parcel before they were alerted to do, and what is really peculiar when they did and immidiately decided to turn it over to FBI, they cleared (some of) the content within two hours for publishing. As this must be the most importent evidence, one should think they would keep it tight to the body.

Above from Washington Post article: Gunman's Video Assaults Campus Again

The difference between Martin Bryant's Port Arthur Massacre and Cho Seung-Hui's VA Tech massacre is Bryant survived his killing spree.

Myriades of threads on the issue right know on ATS, let me just point out a couple.

blog.washingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

What are the reasons for impeachment? Cheiney is a great Vice-President and I don't understand this because I haven't noticed anything that he has done wrong.

He is a strong supporter of this war and a great Patriot utmost, if anything.

Bless Cheiney and America.

If that was the objective, then they got me, because this is the first I've heard of Cheney's impeachment.


Thanks for sharing.

Possible. But this is clearly a case of MK ultra and the efficiency of the program on humans.

I don't think Rep. Kucinich will have much luck in his quest.

NOW THIS is FREAKING !!

Found on this forum a picture of two guys in marine camouflage uniforms dressed up like this. The image originates from Wiki, who already has an article on Cho Seung Hui

Please compare the eyes and eyebrows on the confirmed image of Cho with those on the partial hidden face.




This is a crop from the image in the Wiki article, that by the time I opened LibertyForum still was on. A few moments later when I click the source of the image and is taken to Wiki, it is no longer there.

WHY!!! What's going on and where does the pic initially originate from?

Of course I copied the pic from the discussion forum when I found out.

I'm in possesion of the whole image, depicting the possible Cho with some Caucasian blog similary dressed up.

But for sure those eyes are the same.

[edit on 20-4-2007 by khunmoon]

Where does this picture originate??


Why was it on Wiki for only a day, maybe just hours, before it was taken off?

What's the circumstances at the recording of the image?

Who put it on and who took it off?

Fellow members, some of you have inside connection in the Wikisociety -- use them now, because IF this is Cho, it is uncircumvetable evidence of conspiracy.

Bumping this thread.

I'd like to know the circumstancies the picture of Cho in camoflage uniforms of the marines is taken.

The idea of MK Ultra is very interesting. I'm curious to learn any thoughts or evidence that people could put forth that this is the case.

Some things I found interesting about the videos of Cho, was the way he was reading from some type of script. Why did he put all this down in writing to begin with?? Was the stuff he was saying from his previous writings? He seemed almost hypnotic during the videos.

Look at the hairline. I think it's a different person.

Peace

Different nose, different eyes, different eyebrows and different hairline.
I think this is pretty far-fetched tbh.

Not that far-fetched, I think.

Unfortunately I can't download NBC images. Go to www.msnbc.msn.com... launch the slide show, a scroll down on the page. High(est) resolution, 300 pix w.

12 images of Cho. Compare hairlines, etc, especialy notice the differnce between right and left eye.

Compare.

So when all the VT media attention dies down (say, next week), will Kucinich then be free to file the articles of impeachment without the threat of someone stealing his thunder? If Kucinich truely wants to do this, then no one is stopping him.

I realy doubt your conspiracy theory here because if this is someone's idea of a "grand diversion", it's a bit short-sighted.

It's a different person in the picture.

The massacre was just that .. a massacre. It wasn't a diversion. It was a tragedy. It was mental illness at it's worst.

Somtimes a cigar is just a cigar.

...and a picture is just a picture, I guess.

Still remains to be known how it ended up in Wiki and why it was taken off again? And if it is another picture only, how was it mistaken for the gunman?

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
So when all the VT media attention dies down (say, next week)

You mean in 10 years?

Originally posted by FlyersFan

The massacre was just that .. a massacre. It wasn't a diversion. It was a tragedy. It was mental illness at it's worst.

Actually, you don't know that.

Either it was just a psycho killing or it was an agenda incident.

You don't know, no one knows and this is why some people are interested in finding out, so they research into it.



[edit on 20-4-2007 by selfless]

remeber columbine and the subsequent movie by michael moore? When hes talking to M.Manson an interesting fact comes up, that the day of the shooting, NATO forces led by the US launced they biggest bombing run on Yugoslavia.

Whats interesting is there was no mention in the US media of this massive bombing champaign because everyones attention was focused on the shootings.

183 killed in Iraq and 5 million missing emails and gonzalez testimony, how opportune for them that the VT shooting happened