It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The wtc were not bombed with internal explosives, and despite what Rosie says fire melts everthing!"
This statement is ignorant.
Okay, since you seem so convinced that fire melts everything, maybe you can explain wtc 7. The debris from wtc7 indicated super hot fires had occurred in the structural elements of the building. Clearly fire must have "melted" the building structures. I agree. But where did this fire come from, since no jet hit wtc7 and no jet fuel ever contacted the building?
Originally posted by redseal
Everyone here please tell me what melts thinngs?
There remain a lot of unanswered questions,
Heat. There's a huge difference between heat and "fire". The use of the word fire is too vague. That's what's wrong with your statement.
Originally posted by redseal
Ok so the big conspiracy insnt the twin towers, its wtc7?
So we let terrorist fly 2 planes into the twin towers just so wtc7 would fall?
Originally posted by redseal
Metal I beams dont need to melt for a collapse!
Originally posted by redseal
Metal I beams dont need to melt for a collapse!
Originally posted by redseal
Everyone here please tell me what melts thinngs?
Is it ice?
I know certain chemicals melt at different degrees, But put a frozen stick of butter im a microwave for 5 seconds, it doesnt melt does it, but its much more pliable, case closed!
Originally posted by redseal
Why couldn't it just be so simple as all of the terrorist that we saw on airport security cams, and all of the cell phone calls from people on the planes, and this that and all the other stuff!