It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by makeitso
I disagree.
Prove it. Show me where he was committed.
He was refered, and released not committed.
(visit the link for the full news article)
On Dec. 15, a friend of Cho alerted campus police that Cho might be suicidal. Police transported him to Access, a state mental health agency, which arranged for him to be committed for mental health treatment. Flinchum said he did not know the duration of the treatment or whether it was a voluntary or involuntary commitment.
Originally posted by lazuruswolf
Christ that image really disturbed me a lot. What was going on inside of his head when he did that. More to the point why would someone want to mail something to the media half way through committing such a massacre it's almost like stopping from washing a car going out to the post box so you don't miss the post that day and come back. I know he did not obviously want to alert anyone to his planned actions but still seems pretty devoid of any kind of humanity. I am starting to find this whole thing very creepy indeed.
Originally posted by Realtruth
makeitso,
With all due respect I was a law enforcement officer for over 7 years I know basic local, state, and federal laws well. When someone has been committed to a mental institution, per federal Gun Control Act of 1968 they don't get a gun period.
The ATF regulation is trumped by all federal laws, because it is only a regulation that can be interpreted.
He was committed to a mental facility, end of story.
April 18, 2007 — - A court found that Virginia Tech killer Seung-Hui Cho was "mentally ill" and potentially dangerous. Then it let him go. In December 2005 -- more than a year before Monday's mass shootings -- a district court in Montgomery County, Va., ruled that Cho presented "an imminent danger to self or others." That was the necessary criterion for a detention order, so that Cho, who had been accused of stalking by two female schoolmates, could be evaluated by a state doctor and ordered to undergo outpatient care. According to the "Temporary Detention Order" obtained by ABC News, psychologist Roy Crouse found Cho's "affect is flat and mood is depressed. "He denies suicidal ideation. He does not acknowledge symptoms of a thought disorder," Dr. Crouse wrote. "His insight and judgment are normal." That information came to light two days after Cho, a Virginia Tech senior, killed 32 people and then himself in a shooting rampage on the university's campus. 'An Imminent Danger to Himself' The evaluation came from a psychiatric hospital near Virginia Tech, where Cho was taken by police in December 2005, after two female schoolmates said they received threatening messages from him, and police and school officials became concerned that he might be suicidal. After Dr. Crouse's psychological evaluation of Cho, Special Justice Paul M. Barnett certified the finding, ordering followup treatment on an outpatient basis. On the form, a box is checked, showing that Cho "presents an imminent danger to himself as a result of mental illness." Immediately below it was another box that is not checked: "Presents an imminent danger to others as a result of mental illness." Authorities said they had no contact with Cho between then and Monday's mass killings.
ABC News
Originally posted by Astras
Something will have to be blamed for his frame of mind.... maybe violent computer games again...... Ban Grand Theft Auto? Not the American society.
Do you think that banning a computer game of this sort will really make a difference. How can something like this be stopped?
I am sorry but pinning the blame on Grand Theft Auto as a game that is somehow responsible is absurd. The families of Columbline did that as well and tried to sue the games industry it failed mainly because the industry pointed out that the public and gamers themselves ask for violent games and most of the surveys conducted or research asking if playing these types of games causes them to be more violent most said No to that.
Also GTA as a games series has poor graphics that in no way reflect what it would be like to kill someone in a real world situation I've got some of the games and to be honest I would find it hard if nigh on impossible to think that someone could use those games as a combat training simulator is laughable. It's just too crap for that and unrealistic as well.
You would have to be seriously off your head to take a game by Rockstar like that as what would happen in a real world situation as serious and realistic those games are not any of those things and I personally still feel that violence passive or interactive is partially to blame so is the media on so many different levels. We can't escape the fact that society as well as a whole is also to blame.
Originally posted by el_madmaster
Wow... and people say that "islamofascists" are the source of all of our problems. Extreme Christianity, or any religion really, never fails to amaze me.
Originally posted by el_madmaster
www.godhatesfags.com...
www.godhatesfags.com...
The Westboro Baptist Church plans on protesting at each of the funerals b/c America is "going the way of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Wow... and people say that "islamofascists" are the source of all of our problems. Extreme Christianity, or any religion really, never fails to amaze me.
Originally posted by Astras
A product of American society