It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ludaChris
Supporting resistance groups inside other countries happens all the time, not saying its right or wrong, but its all about common interest. We supported the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan in the 80's, because it was in the best interest of our policy of containment at the time. Interests change over time and now we fight some of the same men who we supported, thats how politics works, right or wrong, its the reality, deal with it.
Originally posted by ludaChris
Supporting resistance groups inside other countries happens all the time, not saying its right or wrong, but its all about common interest. We supported the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan in the 80's, because it was in the best interest of our policy of containment at the time. Interests change over time and now we fight some of the same men who we supported, thats how politics works, right or wrong, its the reality, deal with it.
Originally posted by Souljah
So;
If for example, Iran is supporting resistance groups in Iraq, that is called Terrorism;
But in the case of the United States supporting resistance groups in Iran that is called, errrrrrr, ehmmmm - policy of containment?
Interesting...
[edit on 28/3/07 by Souljah]
Originally posted by LogansRun
WTF? Deal with it? No, dude, we wont and I am an American! We cannot go around the world pushing other countries to do our will, and turn around and scream terrorism when they do the same. Double standard, you cant have it both ways. I am so sick of the hypocrisy of my country. When will people wake up and realize that the ACTIONS by our government aren't the freedom protecting ones we make them out to be.
Originally posted by Souljah
So;
If for example, Iran is supporting resistance groups in Iraq, that is called Terrorism;
But in the case of the United States supporting resistance groups in Iran that is called, errrrrrr, ehmmmm - policy of containment?
Interesting...
[edit on 28/3/07 by Souljah]
Originally posted by sigung86
C'mon Souljah ... You've been spinning spins, and yarning yarns for so long that you seem to forget, or maybe even purposefully forget, that neither side is innocent in the face of national interest.
For all your attempts to paint black on the US, UK, and others, you never seem to be able to stop and look at what the other side is doing, as well.
There is no innocence in national interest. The dirtiest tricks win, and the winners write history.
I won't ever block you, as it is more fun to watch you try and paint your pictures and get folks all riled up. It's too bad, however, that intellectual effort can't be applied to something like a real peace effort. On the other hand, that, often, doesn't seem to fit in with what appears to be your modus operandi. It has often crossed my mind that it would be fun to know who pays who to get those kinds of opinions.
However, if I am wrong, please forgive me. No evil intent is implied or condoned in the writing of this message.
Originally posted by ludaChris
I am also an American, and as I just told Souljah, its the reality of the world we live in. Politics is all about interest, and if you have a common one with a certain country or group, then you have an ally, at least temporarily. I never said we should push other countries around, and I'm not advocating the support of such groups by anyone. But it is the reality of our times, how do you propose to change it?
Originally posted by Navieko
Well first of all, by changing that attitude!
It's exactly that kind of mass mindset that has allowed the reality of which we live in, to come/stay in this existance. All it takes is the most listened/watched nation in the world to change, and the rest follow suit. I'm sure the only reason many other nations follow the same political corruptions in the first place is because they need to, in order to survive.
What many people seem to forget is that it's the people that control the government, but right now it's the otherway around. Because of the brainwashing, propaganda from movies, news... anything mainstream; We are made to believe that what the governments do is normal -- and if you disagree, theres nothing you can do about it because they're in control.
Pure BS, we just need to wake the masses up. Do what we have to do to claim our control back. Doesn't neccessarily mean physical revolution against the governments, but the least we can do is not comply with their "rules". Just ignore them, they're nothing anyway. A tiny minority that is trying to control the rest...why let them?
Spread the word, in any form you can just as long as it makes people wake up. Create a chain reaction. Don't let them make you think it's impossible, because it's already begun. The more people who help now, the faster it will come.
WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!
Originally posted by ludaChris
Dont tell me how to think, or what kind of attitude to have. Intelligence is a dirty business, no one else will play by the rules and if you want to succeed in the intelligence racket the only thing you can do is play the dirtiest. You dont think Iran is in any way supporting the insurgency in Iraq? Pretty naive if you dont think its happening.
Iran supporting insurgents
Syria and Iran aiding Militants
I say if they # us, we # them, plain and simple. And this is only kid stuff compared to what can happen. War by proxy in my opinion. I think you need to wake up from your fantasy world where peace is possible, because as long as humans inhabit the earth it isnt. Even at times when the major powers of the world arent involved in a conflict, which is rare, there are smaller ethnic wars going on. We dont hear about it but rest assured, somewhere there are always little wars going on. Its the way its been, way it is, and way it always will be. Stop living a fantasy and wake up to the reality that we live in a cruel world.
I never said we should push other countries around, and I'm not advocating the support of such groups by anyone. But it is the reality of our times, how do you propose to change it?
Plan B
As June 30th approaches, Israel looks to the Kurds.
by Seymour M. Hersh
June 28, 2004
In July, 2003, two months after President Bush declared victory in Iraq, the war, far from winding down, reached a critical point. Israel, which had been among the war’s most enthusiastic supporters, began warning the Administration that the American-led occupation would face a heightened insurgency—a campaign of bombings and assassinations—later that summer. Israeli intelligence assets in Iraq were reporting that the insurgents had the support of Iranian intelligence operatives and other foreign fighters, who were crossing the unprotected border between Iran and Iraq at will. The Israelis urged the United States to seal the nine-hundred-mile-long border, at whatever cost.
In a series of interviews in Europe, the Middle East, and the United States, officials told me that by the end of last year Israel had concluded that the Bush Administration would not be able to bring stability or democracy to Iraq, and that Israel needed other options. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s government decided, I was told, to minimize the damage that the war was causing to Israel’s strategic position by expanding its long-standing relationship with Iraq’s Kurds and establishing a significant presence on the ground in the semi-autonomous region of Kurdistan. Several officials depicted Sharon’s decision, which involves a heavy financial commitment, as a potentially reckless move that could create even more chaos and violence as the insurgency in Iraq continues to grow.
Israeli intelligence and military operatives are now quietly at work in Kurdistan, providing training for Kurdish commando units and, most important in Israel’s view, running covert operations inside Kurdish areas of Iran and Syria. Israel feels particularly threatened by Iran, whose position in the region has been strengthened by the war. The Israeli operatives include members of the Mossad, Israel’s clandestine foreign-intelligence service, who work undercover in Kurdistan as businessmen and, in some cases, do not carry Israeli passports.
Asked to comment, Mark Regev, the spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Washington, said, “The story is simply untrue and the relevant governments know it’s untrue.” Kurdish officials declined to comment, as did a spokesman for the State Department.
However, a senior C.I.A. official acknowledged in an interview last week that the Israelis were indeed operating in Kurdistan. He told me that the Israelis felt that they had little choice: “They think they have to be there.” Asked whether the Israelis had sought approval from Washington, the official laughed and said, “Do you know anybody who can tell the Israelis what to do? They’re always going to do what is in their best interest.” The C.I.A. official added that the Israeli presence was widely known in the American intelligence community.
The Israeli decision to seek a bigger foothold in Kurdistan—characterized by the former Israeli intelligence officer as “Plan B”—has also raised tensions between Israel and Turkey. It has provoked bitter statements from Turkish politicians and, in a major regional shift, a new alliance among Iran, Syria, and Turkey, all of which have significant Kurdish minorities. In early June, Intel Brief, a privately circulated intelligence newsletter produced by Vincent Cannistraro, a retired C.I.A. counterterrorism chief, and Philip Giraldi, who served as the C.I.A.’s deputy chief of base in Istanbul in the late nineteen-eighties, said:
Originally posted by Navieko
You asked how we propose to change the world... I answered. But of course, it's much easier to believe it isn't possible. Just some fantasy. That way you don't need to do #, right?
I never stated, or even thought for a second that Iran didn't do anything wrong, or dirty. In fact that was one of my points. Iran, Iraq, and almost all nations today, play dirty. But thats because the bigger nations, the nations that hold power in this world; They're the ones that started/escalated this big mess. The others must follow, in order to survive.
Of course, as humans, there will always be corruption in some form. But that's not to say there cannot be much less. A better way. I think it is naive to say otherwise, and to ignore the possibility is selfish.
If you want to deal with our reality for what it is, and just forget about it, go ahead. But there is a rapidly growing number out there that simply will not let it go on. And there are even more that simply need to be waken up, in order to see the possibilities.
Time will tell whether or not we the people will succeed...we may very well fail. But we're sure as hell not going to just sit by and let it slide without a fight.
[edit on 28/3/07 by Navieko]
Originally posted by ludaChris
As I stated in my post, I wasnt advocating anything, or saying its right or wrong for anyone to do it. I was simply stating the reality, that it happens and right or wrong you and I are just going to have to deal with it. Just plain and simple reality, am I right or wrong?