Charlie Sheen To Narrate Loose Change Final Cut

Originally posted by Esoterica
Considering I don't know of any qualifications that would put Sheen in any position to confirm or deny anything from a technical standpoint, isn't this just some sort of appeal to celebrity? "Look, a famous/powerful figure endorses us, so we must be right!" Isn't that the sort of mentality the average conspiracy theorist avoids and actively campaigns against?

I'd be more impressed if they got an accredited engineer or professor to narrate it. But Charlie Sheen... might as well be Homer Simpson.

I think you are missing the point here. He isn't doing this because they tried to 'hire' a celebrity. He WANTED to do this because he honestly feels that there are too many questions out there that have NOT been answered about this fateful day in this worlds history. He isn't going to be presenting information that he is an expert on. It's like any other documentary out there that has a celebrity as its face.

Anyway, my stance is known to anyone who has seen my posts. The truth has not been told about September 11th. However, LC is NOT the right film to be putting in front of the nation. Sure, it will get the point out there that something fishy took place on that day but it is bias on a number of issues that it points out and I don't think they presented the right arguments.

Anyway, it's interesting that the issue will be thrown in the face of the public finally. I just wish it would have been done with a different film.

Originally posted by Pootie

Originally posted by savage99
Another cut of loose change?

Is this going to be the one where they edit out all of the misleading information and half-truths?

Yes, also this is the on being financed by a billionaire, reviewed by hundreds of scientists, narrated by a mainstream celebrity and distributed by a very larg distribution company.

This will be the only chance that this film has in making a true impression. They need to get rid of the garbage and assumptions in the film and only present the hard evidence. If they ad in a large list of big wigs that come forward and make their stance known in place of the garbage then LC may be the right film.

However, as it stood in the last edit it was NOT the right film.

when will th new Loose Change be available for viewing?

Originally posted by dariousg
They need to get rid of the garbage and assumptions in the film and only present the hard evidence. If they ad in a large list of big wigs that come forward and make their stance known in place of the garbage then LC may be the right film.

However, as it stood in the last edit it was NOT the right film.

they know they need to clean up the errors... as a matter of fact, they "re-released" LC2 to clean up some errors. They WERE college kids acting alone previous to this... Now they have a team of whistleblowers, scientists, firefigters, survivors, politicians and many others to check their work.

This isn't just two well intentioned yet slightly ill-informed college kids making noise anymore.

Originally posted by gen.disaray

Originally posted by 22250
I think its great, Fox News just trashed Sheen and LC, I get so pissed off...

the reason fox does that is because lc is full of $hit ! and cs is just jumping on a crashing bandwagon . im really sick of all the talk of holograms and
planes flying OVER the pentagon . just look at the average iq of most these "truth movement " people . it's not very high .most of them , like lc , doing it to profit from an american nightmare .

Now you are going to attack people that believe something is wrong with the 'official' scam story force fed to people by the government? I have 3 degrees including and MBA and am working on a PhD in Psychology. I guess my IQ is just extremely low. Same with all of the professors and engineers who have come forward to question the 'official' story.

The people with an IQ in question are most likely the ones that believe that the following statement isn't a psychological attack on the people of not only the U.S. but of the world:

"If you are not with us then you are with the terrorists."

Plain and simple mind manipulation there. No room for a middle ground. No room to question the government. You either are with 'US' or you are an evil terrorist.

What else does that statement do? It says that you are unAmerican if you question the government. It says that you are evil if you question them. It says that you hate the U.S. and everything it stands for. Because that is what the 'terrorists' believe right?

Well, it's the furthest thing from the truth. I love this country and WHAT IT USED TO BE BASED ON. In the America I know and love it is OUR DUTY to question the government. It was never designed to get as big as it has gotten yet they have managed to do so. I mean, how much of our tax dollars goes into the ever expanding government budget? How much does the average senator make? How much of a raise have they received over the past decade? How much has the average American gotten?

Okay, off point. What I am saying is that it is OUR money that goes into this government so it is our right to question them on ANY point. When their commission failed to answer almost 90% of the questions put forth to them then it is OUR job to make sure that they DO answer them. And what the hell was our senate running the investigation for anyway? That was a huge joke if I ever saw one.

Also, why is there ANY classified documents about that fateful day and any day leading up to it? There shouldn't be! There are no military secrets that fall under national security. That alone should raise the suspicions of the people. THERE SHOULD BE NO CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS ABOUT THAT DAY! Period! Yet there are. All classified under the guise of 'National Security'. A cowards way out of explaining the truth is all that has become. Those documents will be blacked out and put in the cooler just like the JFK files. "Until all parties involved are dead." Total crap there.

Talk about full of $hit! We deserve answers.

Oh yeah, you talk about a crashing bandwagon. Take a look at the current administration and just look at how many have left in just the last 6 months. Not only is it crashing but it is sinking to the deepest parts of the ocean my friend. The truth will come out.

I just wish that LC was not the movie to be presented to the public. It has too many holes and will be torn apart.

Originally posted by Pootie

Originally posted by dariousg
They need to get rid of the garbage and assumptions in the film and only present the hard evidence. If they ad in a large list of big wigs that come forward and make their stance known in place of the garbage then LC may be the right film.

However, as it stood in the last edit it was NOT the right film.

they know they need to clean up the errors... as a matter of fact, they "re-released" LC2 to clean up some errors. They WERE college kids acting alone previous to this... Now they have a team of whistleblowers, scientists, firefigters, survivors, politicians and many others to check their work.

This isn't just two well intentioned yet slightly ill-informed college kids making noise anymore.

That was what I wanted to see. If they add to the edits all of the testimonies of the officials that have come out and of the fire fighters and such then it will make a much better impression on the people. That was what was missing from the first two.

I'm looking forward to seeing it. I just hope it is done right.

Originally posted by dariousg
I'm looking forward to seeing it. I just hope it is done right.

I think "doing it right" means producing it under an entirely different name.

Loose Change has too much baggage.

Throw in Sheen as the front man and all you have is late night comedian fodder. (Shall we start a pool for when the first time the movie is referred to as "Loose Change: Part Deux?")

If they want to be taken seriously, they have to start from scratch.

Originally posted by Essedarius

Originally posted by dariousg
I'm looking forward to seeing it. I just hope it is done right.

I think "doing it right" means producing it under an entirely different name.

Loose Change has too much baggage.

Throw in Sheen as the front man and all you have is late night comedian fodder. (Shall we start a pool for when the first time the movie is referred to as "Loose Change: Part Deux?")

If they want to be taken seriously, they have to start from scratch.

I agree 100,000%! They have the basis and the money. They should start over and do it right. This way they can drop the baggage. Great point and kind of what I was trying to get at.

My point is this: In the two weeks prior to this event this is what happend:

The BBC video was found and not a word from the media, five people came out publicly with important info and not a word. Rosie evens joins the truth movement and still not a word from the media. But that morning it was leaked that Sheen would do the voice over and in just one night we get this:

Scarborough Unleashes Attack Dogs On Walters Over O'Donnell 9/11 Comments

Last night MSNBC's Joe Scarborough devoted a whole segment to attacking veteran journalist, and co-presenter of ABC's The View, Barbara Walters over Rosie O'Donnell's now public stance that 9/11 was an inside job.

Fox Bully O'Reilly Says Loose Change Will Destroy Sheen

Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor featured a segment last night in which TV bully Bill O'Reilly warned Charlie Sheen that narrating Loose Change would destroy his career, amidst a cacophony of slurs, smears and Holocaust jibes, characterized by this and other hit pieces that carried all the weight of a third grader's scribbled essay paper and couldn't even pin down basic facts.


FOX News Threatens Sheen & Cuban Not to Make Film

FOX News' Bill O'Reilly warned actor Charlie Sheen not to do narration for a theatrical version of Loose Change, threatening "If he voices this, he's through" and stating plainly, "Don't do this. You're not gonna come back from it if you do."

Debunking NY Post's Tabloid Hit Piece On Sheen/O'Donnell
As sophisticated as a Chicago Bears fan after a heavy drinking session
The New York Post has produced a typically and purposefully ignorant hit piece against both Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen for going public with their views on 9/11, commenting that they should "keep their traps shut".

Access Hollywood covers 9/11 Sheen leak, gets basic O'Donnell facts wrong
Access Hollywood has put out the following report in wake of the New York Post hit piece on Charlie Sheen & Rosie O'Donnell. Note how they state that the Post reports O'Donnell is to be involved in a new edition of Loose Change. This is totally wrong and wasn't even reported by the Post, showing once again that the people that run these outlets cannot do basic research.