It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are a new member, so I'll excuse the running to the ignore button.
Originally posted by Smack
You are a new member, so I'll excuse the running to the ignore button.
Actually I was inferring that YOU use that function. It seems like you came to vent your spleen on this post. Perhaps you have something against Sleeper, I don't know.
Regardless, you've added nothing to the conversation, our ideas seem to upset you, why don't you use the ignore button, or better yet, bugger off?
Originally posted by OnTheDeck
There has been a lot of activity with the sun of late.
Originally posted by sleeper
How do the scientist know how old the sun or planets are---did they pull those numbers out of their hat?---
There is absolutely no way of knowing---perhaps their theories should be put into skunkworks also---
All theories are guesses or hunches and have not been proven else they wouldn’t be theories. It’s obvious I am being discriminated against because I’m not a scientist---what a cheap shot by those that moved this thread
Originally posted by johnsky
What is all this I'm hearing about "You're wrong because high school physics says so..."
So we're down to that form of ignorance now are we?
If it weren't for people creating alternate theories on how things work, and defying the rules that your precious high school physics teaches, we'd still be stuck in the stone age.
Those who argued immediately that his theory is wrong from the start, I have one thing to say to you.
YOU WILL NEVER INVENT, NOR CREATE ANYTHING.
Quite frankly, anyone who isn't willing to test what they are being taught is a mindless drone... and essentially useless to the advancement of our species.
Go find a hole, and rot.
As for the author of this theory, keep it up, and don't get discouraged by these half wits. One day you just may become famous for one of your theories, unlike these morons.
Originally posted by 7Ayreon
Than again. This forum seriously promotes wasted time.
[edit on 11/3/2007 by 7Ayreon]
Originally posted by sleeper
More in line with a younger Mercury, the basic mold; once born the other elements are added kind of like electroplating---one layer at a time as dust gases and other solar system debris bombard it.
Originally posted by Long Lance
the birth of stellar objects can be found at much larger scale, too: www.livingcosmos.com...
Originally posted by Stari
Sleeper, I think that is an excellent theory that you have. It is the best I have heard yet.
I am still confused over the big bang theory being proven because scientists are hearing noise in space and that is the noise left over from the big bang.
Wouldn't that noise have dissipated over the Millions of years?
Originally posted by Smack
Modern Cosmology has become dogmatic in its approach and in some circles it seems, has become more like a religion. I'm astounded by some of the posts I've read here. These are the same kinds of people that defended the flat earth theory hundreds of years ago. Its really pathetic.
Originally posted by johnsky
As for the author of this theory, keep it up, and don't get discouraged by these half wits. One day you just may become famous for one of your theories, unlike these morons.
Originally posted by hikix
why are you privy to this info??
Originally posted by biotic
sleeper, im not in anyway disregarding your speculations about the son being pregnant, in my opinion it is a very good idea
but, how do you know its pregnant at this very moment?
Originally posted by Long Lance
this model of planets outward travelling and growing (reference) planets works well for all inner planets until Mars - if you accept that Mars was actually the moon of a planet that later formed the asteroid belt. what about the outer gas planets?
they have lots of moons, so it's imo ok to adapt the model for them, ie. gas planets bear moons, but what about the gas planets themselves?