It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Smack
And The accretion disk model is different how?
How can we discover the shape of a thing without testing every facet of it. Question everything!
Originally posted by Where2Hide2006
And Also How Long is it between Birthing Phases???
Scientists suggest the sun is something like 4.6 billion years old. .
- there is reason for real scientific debate on the subject. reference the work of Nobel Prize winner - Hannes Alfvén
Like a hairball that has formed in the interior of the sun, planets get spit out every now and then.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I bet you'd really be frustrated with spiritual discussion.
Sience changes every so often you must remember.
All theories are debated and tested by various scientists who may side with or against a theory. sleeper seems unwilling or unable to debate and test his. If he could at least try to show some supporting evidence, that would be a start.
Originally posted by cpdaman
sleeper i applaud you for your creative thought
Originally posted by Smack
...like a Nobel Prize winner in Physics? ...or is that not enough of an Authority for you?
Originally posted by biotic
sleeper, im not in anyway disregarding your speculations about the son being pregnant, in my opinion it is a very good idea
but, how do you know its pregnant at this very moment?
Originally posted by sleeper
Originally posted by Smack
...like a Nobel Prize winner in Physics? ...or is that not enough of an Authority for you?
That’s a powerful argument and should be addressed by the mod that moved this thread---unless it was moved for ulterior and prejudiced reasons.
Thanks Smack!
[edit on 10-3-2007 by sleeper]
Originally posted by fooffstarr
The UFO field is about the study of EVIDENCE, not about baseless, crackpot theories. You, and people like you, are the reason UFOlogy has such a stigma attached to it.
Oh, c'mon. You've posted 2 of the most ridiculous threads in the history of these forums, without any supporting evidence, and you expect them to be left in a serious discussion area?
Originally posted by sleeper
Originally posted by fooffstarr
The UFO field is about the study of EVIDENCE, not about baseless, crackpot theories. You, and people like you, are the reason UFOlogy has such a stigma attached to it.
And what are your contributions to ufology or for that matter anything?
You must be well decorated to be judging me
I'm guessing you haven't read any of the links I posted, you've probably ignored completely, any facts germane to the topic, and yet you reflexively spew your venom because...?
Originally posted by sleeper
All theories are guesses or hunches and have not been proven else they wouldn’t be theories. It’s obvious I am being discriminated against because I’m not a scientist---what a cheap shot by those that moved this thread