It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Identified
Illuminze,
Fair enough. So you are basically saying that this was a stupid mistake made by some insiders on a day of events on an unprecidented scale?
Okay. I can go with that. Couldn't the BBC tape be the same thing? LOL
Anyway okay so they made a mistake. They panicked. whatever. I would have thought with all the planning that had to go into 9/11 that this scenario would have been played out in a million different ways with all the fixes planned as well. But it could have been a mistake. Wow to think that a simple logical thought process by anyone that day could have saved them all the grief.
As for them thinking someone would have thought the damage isn't that bad. IF they were willing to demolish a building and lie about it they could have much easier have planted more damage and lied about that.
Originally posted by freakyty
And if they don't know HOW it came down, how could anyone have predicted that it is 'collapsing or about to collapse'?
FEMA DIRECTOR: "OK everyone, we need to clear the area, this building is coming down!"
WITNESS: "But all I see is a few mysterious fires, why would it collapse?"
FEMA DIRECTOR: "We don't know why, all we know is its coming down"
compartmentalization
Originally posted by Identified
Originally posted by Chicagofreedomfighter
Originally posted by Identified
And let's not forget that we now have them sending out a press release to early about this lie? It makes no sense. Why send out a press release at all if you don't want even more people to pay attention to what might be exposed as explosions rather than just a collapse?
Maybe the truth coming out was always part of the plan. Because they would know then within 7 years the unrest about the events that occurred that day would create the civil right we now face in this country, IE US civil war!!
Hmmmmmmmm, just a thought
Maybe. Or maybe they did all this just to keep us focused on one little building for 7 years so that we weren't paying attention to all the other nefarious things they are doing or had done?
Or maybe it did just collapse? ;-)
Originally posted by Identified
Or maybe it did just collapse? ;-)
\
Originally posted by Illuminze
Originally posted by Identified
Or maybe it did just collapse? ;-)
One thing you can take to the bank though. It didn't "just collapse"!!!
Short of finding actual detonation charges or specific explosive residue or cut beams a demolition will look like a structural failure since all demolition is is damaging certain areas of a structure to cause a structural failure.
Based on chemical analysis of WTC structural steel residue, a Brigham Young University physics professor has identified the material as Thermate. Thermate is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur cases the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue.
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Short of finding actual detonation charges or specific explosive residue or cut beams a demolition will look like a structural failure since all demolition is is damaging certain areas of a structure to cause a structural failure.
There have been plenty of cut beans found and test have shown residue of thermite on them.
Is it also just a coincidence that the steel was hauled off under armed guard and sent to china?
Its also a well known fact that in the weeks leading up to 9-11 the WTC had numerous evacuations and power shut downs and had workers in the buildings supposedly upgrading the cable system.
Watch these videos that show the unusual things that were done at the WTC in the weeks prior to 9-11
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
Could you please give me the evidence of thermite as an explosive in this case?
Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns, as evident in the photo below.
Or some evidence that I myself can evaluate.
Armed Guard to China? Okay where is that evidence because I know that Northrup got a lot of it to build US Naval Ships. I don't think it went thru China first. Don't know about the armed Guards but will comment when I see the evidence.
The bulk of the steel was apparently shipped to China and India. The Chinese firm Baosteel purchased 50,000 tons at a rate of $120 per ton, compared to an average price of $160 paid by local mills in the previous year. 2
September 2001-November 26, 2001: Theft of WTC Steel Leads to Tight Security Measures.
In the month following 9/11, a significant amount of the steel debris from the WTC collapses is removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at a recycling plant or shipped out of the US. [US Congress, 3/6/2002] Each of the twin towers contained 78,000 tons of recyclable steel. Much of this is shipped to India, China, and other Asian countries
Does Prof. Jones know that Thermite is nothing more than aluminum and powdered iron oxide? And that Thermate is just adding sulfur to the mix. And I wonder if perhaps if I took apart my office right now if I could find all those chemicals? In fact I have an iron oxide necklace and some aluminum foil that often get really close together.
So what if China got it all? We were selling and they were buying.