BBC News Reports Building 7 collapse 23 Minutes before it collapses.

Posted by Identified, on February 27, 2007 at 15:15 GMT I had to login to post this as well. Seems the Anonymous Posting System isn't working correctly. I am not sure where everyone is getting the timestamps from since all the video I have seen only has time stamps from editors who have uploaded the video. However, I do know that the BBC does the timestamp tone at the top of the hour. So we can assume it was the top of some hour was just two minutes before the following is mentioned. The News Desk Anchorman says that just moments before he was told that President Bush “expected to be leaving Nebraska to return to Washington.” We know that it was already reported that Bush was going to leave Offutt AFB in Nebraska before 4:30 Eastern Time. We also know that Air Force One was seen leaving Offutt at roughly 4:33 Eastern. We also know that many news agencies were reporting a fire and evacuation of WTC7 at 4:10 Eastern. In my estimation the reporter was mistaken by the news that WTC7 was on fire, being evacuated and was likely to collapse and reported it instead as news that it already collapsed and did so after the 4:30 news that the president was about to leave Nebraska. And that is exactly 20 minutes after the first news was reported that WTC7 was on fire. Otherwise it makes no sense why they would report something that is about to happen and then be mistaken about something that has already happened such as the presidents plane leaving Nebraska. The entire news cast is off timeline in that case.

You posted originally with the Anonymous Posting System, to tell us "the reporter was mistaken" Then you felt there was something wrong with the APS so you just had to join to tell us something that had allready been said. Add to that the fact you have been here now for the last twelve hours, that's dedication for you.

oh btw your Igd.

Watching?

OOHHH.

Enjoy yourself.

Originally posted by Identified

Originally posted by tombangelta
your obviously some kind of 911 myth / truth debunker and 99% of us here are coming from a totally different point of view.

So this forum is just for those who support the theories? Doesn't matter what the theory we are all just to support it or we are automatically some kind of 911 myth/ truth debunker?

Here I thought it was for weeding out the truth. Not just accepting what the thread creater said or what anyone else said.

Lets GET BACK ON TRACK

May I suggest again the fact that this whole story, which is surely the biggest story circulating the web and alternative media has not even been touched by the mainstream media.

Lets move on just forget this guy see him for what he is




[edit: clipped quote to relevant portion]

[edit on 28-2-2007 by 12m8keall2c]

Originally posted by Rotator

You posted originally with the Anonymous Posting System, to tell us "the reporter was mistaken" Then you felt there was something wrong with the APS so you just had to join to tell us something that had allready been said. Add to that the fact you have been here now for the last twelve hours, that's dedication for you.

oh btw your Igd.

12 hours? I don't think so. Went to bed last night and then to work this morning. Again what has this to do with anything? Oh right NOTHING!

I am still discussion the BBC so long as people would stay on topic.


[edit: clipped quote to relevant portion]


[edit on 28-2-2007 by 12m8keall2c]

Originally posted by Identified
Watching?

OOHHH.

Enjoy yourself.

Well at least you get paid for it...perhaps,where as I do it too stop the disinfo.

[Identified Attempting to misdirect and not answer direct questions that put his credibility on the line, and instead arguing that he is being in justly accused.

Now he is using a "smear" tactic in order to proclaim that people usually labeled as "Conspiracy Theorists" are not open to any other explanation other than our "own versions"

Do not lets this slick rick, confuse you he has repeatedly changed subject, redirected the flow of this thread. His ultimate goal is that things get so off track this thread self destructs and is closed or that no one will care because we just keep running in circles.

Lets GET BACK ON TRACK

May I suggest again the fact that this whole story, which is surely the biggest story circulating the web and alternative media has not even been touched by the mainstream media.

Lets move on just forget this guy see him for what he is





Oooh you have me now. Whatever will the world do?

Originally posted by Chicagofreedomfighter

Lets GET BACK ON TRACK

May I suggest again the fact that this whole story, which is surely the biggest story circulating the web and alternative media has not even been touched by the mainstream media.

Lets move on just forget this guy see him for what he is

They probably haven't touched it as no-one has shown hard proof that it was anything more than jumping the gun.

kuhl

Knock yourself out it isn't as if I care what you are watching.

Identified,

Please show me one other example of a steal frame building that collapsed from fire that is similar to a controlled demolition in a fashion similar to WTC 7.

As for those that are saying "Identified" is a dis info agent....just look at the evolution of her post.

From the supposed housewife who's supposed husband takes a limo to the WTC complex and did not know which building he had his meetings in to the informed expert on demolitions and the 9-11 and NIST reports.



[edit on 28-2-2007 by etshrtslr]

so what you are saying ID is that the BBC received word that the building is going to collapse. and then by mistake 3 news channels reported that wtc 7 had already collapsed.

the building collapsed straight to the ground in 8.5 seconds free fall because of its unique design ?

Originally posted by Identified
kuhl

Knock yourself out it isn't as if I care what you are watching.

Hit a nerve?

Hope I'm not off your xmas card list already ,anyway ignore me and carry on with your views...please.

Maybe I'm wrong but..I doubt it.

Originally posted by etshrtslr
Identified,

Please show me one other example of a steal frame building that collapsed from fire in a that is similar to a controlled demolition in a fashion similar to WTC 7.

As for those that are saying "Identified" is a dis info agent....just look at the evolution of her post.

From the supposed housewife who's supposed husband takes a limo to the WTC complex and did not know which building he had his meetings in to the informed expert on demolitions and the 9-11 and NIST reports.



[edit on 28-2-2007 by etshrtslr]

---------->Large Sighs of relief

[edit on 28-2-2007 by Chicagofreedomfighter]

Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 28-2-2007 by 12m8keall2c]

Originally posted by etshrtslr
Identified,

Please show me one other example of a steal frame building that collapsed from fire in a controlled demolishion in a fashion similar to WTC 7.

As for those that are saying "Identified" is a dis info agent....just look at the evolution of her post.

From the supposed housewife who's supposed husband takes a limo to the WTC complex and did not know which building he had his meetings in to the informed expert on demolitions and the 9-11 and NIST reports.

I don't understand what you are asking? You want an example of "controlled demolishion" from "fire"? Similar to WTC 7? I don't even know if anyone does control demolitions by fire.

I never said I was a housewife if by house wife you mean I stay at home. I work outside the home. I am work right now.

My husband doesn't take a limo, I never said Limo anywhere. He takes a car. If you know anyone who lives in the city and is an executive you will know they take cars almost everywhere from Westchester County to the tip of Long Island. That is just what companies do. So when my husband had a meeting down with an office in the WTC complex he took a car. The car had a driver. Sometimes there would several people in the car with him.

If you think I am an expert on demolitions then it is no wonder where you get your information from. I am no expert.


If the sweeping generalization in this post is any indication of how you come about your "evidence" then I am well ahead to stay clear of anything you might have read or saw. Where you plucked some of these gems from is a mystery even this forum couldnt unwind.









[edit on 28-2-2007 by Identified]

there is nothing i can say that has not allready been said by a dozen posters, and a picture speaks a thousand words, so here is my statement on the matter, i tend to think the energy wasted on trying to make people in this thread see the BBC is full of crap, would be better spent convincing others to boycott the BBC and everything it stands for.



[edit on 28-2-2007 by The Blade Runner]

IDEN what are your views on this video



[edit on 28-2-2007 by tombangelta]

Just thought I would share this with any intrested minds?




We are witnessing the unraveling of the 9/11 cover-up.

infowars.com...

Originally posted by tombangelta
IDEN what are your views on this video

Is there something in particular you want my view on?

I don't think Identified floats like a duck, so how about we stop the witch hunt?

Has anyone found a press release or perhaps more on the source yet? Does anyone know who puts news onto the wire and does the BBC use the same wire as every other news outlet around the world?

Anything else to do with the BBC video, because if all people want is the truth, there are some here that are going the wrong way about it by imposing their beliefs on this thread, about the BBC video.

I don't understand what you are asking? You want an example of "controlled demolishion" from "fire"? Similar to WTC 7? I don't even know if anyone does control demolitions by fire.

I want an example of a steal frame building that collapsed from fire similar to those that have been brought down by controlled demolition.

Originally posted by Muppetus Galacticus

Has anyone found a press release or perhaps more on the source yet? Does anyone know who puts news onto the wire and does the BBC use the same wire as every other news outlet around the world?

i agree lets concentrate on the source