It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Royal76
It was a missle from the United States of America that hit the Pentagon. The United States, or CIA killed alot of people who deserved much better than what they got from the country they SERVED.
Originally posted by pmexplorer
Caustic,
I have examined the video you speak of from infowars and I think I can see what you are mentioning in your previous post.
It seems a white object moves very quickly from left to right in the direction of the pentagon at high speed and at the time of the explosion, almost seemingly along the highway in front, BUT while I concur there is an object I do not believe anyone could categorically state from that footage alone that that is the tailfin of Flight 77.
However it does need professional examination, I'm no camera expert but I am sure there are guys out there who could get a clearer or blown up image of what is in the frame. I am still undecided about it.
Originally posted by Connected
You havnen't done enough reading or homework then. That's a true sign of a US Government follower.
Originally posted by PartChimp
Originally posted by Connected
You havnen't done enough reading or homework then. That's a true sign of a US Government follower.
I want to thank nick however, for being level headed. Nick is the type of person that will open this conspiracy up to the general public, not the slanderous ilk of alex jones and the like.
Originally posted by PartChimp
Originally posted by Connected
You havnen't done enough reading or homework then. That's a true sign of a US Government follower.
See, this is where you're very wrong. There are quite a lot of conspiracies i cast my lot in with. Quite a lot of which do not run with the grain of the US government. Comments such as yours, which immediately show bias at doubters and skeptics, are another reason why the majority of Americans will never even give this theory a run-through. Ninety-five percent of the truth seekers out there are frothing at the mouth and seething with such hatred for the government that they can't deal with the fact that their theory, vacant of tangible evidence by all accounts, may not be purported by others, or *gasp* may be completely wrong.
I want to thank nick however, for being level headed. Nick is the type of person that will open this conspiracy up to the general public, not the slanderous ilk of alex jones and the like.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Yep. No official complete investigation. Kinda makes you wonder. No good videos showing the plane released. Kinda makes you wonder. Rumsfeld "admitted" a missile hit the building. Kinda makes you wonder.
Wait a minute... it almost seems the government officials WANT us to keep wondering. Should we be playing into this if so? Who's providing the raw materials to feed the "conspiracy industry?" Can we just do our own investigation?
frustratingfraud.blogspot.com... terlist.html
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
I have been doing my own investigation. I am a data analysist with NSA and have access to government sites and i have not been able to come up with any evidence or reports that explains what really happened that day.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I just looked closer and still can't see a tailfin - it'd be to the left, moving to center of screen. I do see a white shape doing just that, but I'm pretty sure it's a truck catching glare for a moment like the others do, just that one lined up with the plane's line of attack. No way would the tailfin look that big. It was on the other side of a raised highway and just shy of half a mile away (about 2,750 feet). The view is obstructed enough that we can't see even the roofline of the Pentagon (77 feet high), even on its closest corner. The plane was at ground level basically, and has a tailfin height of only 44 feet. If what Gwion is seeing is a tailfin, it's just on the other side of that highway, like 200 feet from the camera. Even the cameras right on the Pentagon lawn a few hundred feet away don't show a tailfin that big and white and clear.
So the video shows no plane. That doesn't mean there's no plane, it just means this cam a half-mile away should NOT sho the plane, despite what the text on-screen says. No Pentagon visible means no plane visible. Am I wrong?
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
No, dude. The Pentagon is a half-mile away - check the map - the 77-foot high Pentagon is invisible at that distance, so how could we see a 44-foot-high tailfin level with the middle of that invisible building?
Oh good lord No! Do you think I would be that goofy? DON'T Answer that!
And that big and clear at that distance? Look at the white blur on the Pentagon's security cameras - that's at about 600 feet away. This camera was about 2,000 feet further away. How big is this friggin tailfin? And considering all that traffic moving in the same direction much closer, I'm guessing that's what this is. A whole steam of "talifins" headed to work...
But this is a small point in the big picture - And as for your persistent argument that they just screwed up, I guess it's off point, but I don't buy it. Again, think about it:
"Oops, we screwed up and didn't stop the attack we fully meant to stop. But oh well, now we can wage all the wars we already had set-up awaiting an excuse, we can pass the PATRIOT Act we already wrote up, establsih the DHS we already had set up, double Bush's popularity overnight, increase military recruitment, etc. Damn, if only we'd stopped that attack. Too bad we keep stumbling into empire. Boy are we INCOMPETENT."
Sorry, I guess I'm just too busy being "comforted" by conspiracy theoories to accept the hard and frightening truth that our rulers are essentially beneficient but screw up sometimes. That's just too hard a truth to swallow.
If sarcasm was a vitamin I could bottle it and supply a small nation.
Originally posted by GwionX
I know what I see, at first I thought it was the tail-fin...until I zoomed the image and watched the video frame-by frame. It was then I realized it was the right wing of the plane banking as it was decending..after it does you can breifly see the tail section of the plane, then the explosion. The pentagon is not invisible --as in being too far away to see..as is clearly evidenced by that very explosion. the roofline of the Pentagon is at roughly the same height as the overpass ..(in perspective, of course) Are you saying you cannot see a jumbo-jet 800 yards away? I sure can, anytime I go to the Airport.