It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GwionX
I saw the Tail Fin section of an airplane...going very fast and very low.
The location of the camera prevents the whole plane from being shown, but logic would follow: If a plane disappears in Washington (flt 77) on 9/11/2001, and you see a video of an object with a large tail-fin going extremely fast, directly into the Pentagon..... Then Flt 77 was flown into the Pentagon.
Those individuals that present fallacy as fact are irresponsible citizens IMO, and are dangerous to people that lack critical thinking skills.
Originally posted by GwionX
I realize this isn't as much fun as concocting a complex plan.
Originally posted by GwionX
Yeah someone at the FAA skrewed the pooch on 9/11 they got the numbers 11 and the numbers 77 mixed up... (visulize a radar screen with a person who has never had experience with several hi-jacked aircraft in-flight before;
Bzzzzz -wrong answer!
Nobody got the numbers of Flight 77 and Flight 11 screwed up. The fact that you even came up with such an odd explanation shows that you might want to do a little bit more homework on this subject.
The FAA called NORAD and told them that Flight 11 did NOT hit WTC1 and was heading SW from New York towards Washington D.C. According the the 9/11 Commission Report, NORAD wasn't even notified that Flight 77 was a hijacking until after it crashed.
There is nobody (except you) who is claiming that an ATC got the numbers 11 and 77 confused.
Their answer, that an unidentified source at the FAA reported a "phantom" Flight 11 heading towards Washington is absurd. How could anybody have seen Flight 11 heading towards Washington when it was already off the radar?
Originally posted by sp00n1
You can see small cars traveling on the freeway that the plane had to fly over, but for some reason you dont see the huge effin jumbo jet flyin' over the freeway?????
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by sp00n1
You can see small cars traveling on the freeway that the plane had to fly over, but for some reason you dont see the huge effin jumbo jet flyin' over the freeway?????
Yeah, I saw what looks like a semi-truck/trailer combo go by, but NO PLANE.
How could a 757 have a lower profile then cars?
Where is that damn plane!
Originally posted by GwionX
Transponders or not...it is a simple feasible explaination..and a *prime example* of how one hand of our government isn't knowing what the other is doing. i.e uncoordinated incompetence.
In a pre-9/11 world, uncoordinated incompetence was the pathos du jour.
9/11 Commission Report, Page 26
Military Notification and Response. NORAD heard nothing about the search for American 77. Instead, the NEADS air defenders heard renewed reports about a plane that no longer existed:American 11.
At 9:21, NEADS received a report from the FAA:
FAA: Military,Boston Center.I just had a report that American 11 is still in the air, and it’s on its way towards—heading towards Washington.
NEADS: Okay. American 11 is still in the air?
FAA:Yes.
NEADS: On its way towards Washington?
FAA: That was another—it was evidently another aircraft that hit the
tower.That’s the latest report we have.
NEADS: Okay.
FAA: I’m going to try to confirm an ID for you, but I would assume
he’s somewhere over, uh, either New Jersey or somewhere further
south.
NEADS: Okay. So American 11 isn’t the hijack at all then, right?
FAA: No, he is a hijack.
NEADS: He—American 11 is a hijack?
FAA: Yes.
NEADS: And he’s heading into Washington?
FAA: Yes.This could be a third aircraft.
The mention of a “third aircraft”was not a reference to American 77.
Easy, they didn't see flight 11..they saw an off-course flight 77 and make an incorrect assumption it was in-fact the same plane..which we all know it was not. The scrambled jets were out of position but still close enough to the Pentagon to get a visual... This tells me that the moment flight 77 reappeared on radar FAA made the incorrect call, unintentionally diverting the F-16's flightpath. Incompetence..not villany.
Originally posted by GwionX
Look, what I can tell you from that transcript is -- The FAA was obviously confused.
Why is it such a stretch that the identity of flight 11 and flight 77 were also confused?
Jersey or more South. Where does this come from?
It comes from a person thinking flight 11 is still in the air heading toward Washington from the New york area...the statement: "or somewhere further South." Indicates they don't know exactly where it is...But some ATC recalls seeing 11 or 77 further south.
It was actually Flight 77 heading for Washington. Obviously, hindsight is 20/20.
The person that made the call is probabally grief stricken...Why add insult to injury by releasing his or her name so CT's can badger them.
How can you assume the FAA was "confused?"
Here's why it's a stretch...
1) Here's a big reason... Flight 11 hit WTC1 at 8:46 am! Everybody in the country except the guy from the FAA on the phone with NEADS knew this by 9:21 am.
2) The FAA never advised NEADS that Flight 77 was even hijacked. The FAA first advised NEADS at 9:34 that Flight 77 was missing.
3) If the FAA would have mixed up Flight 11 and Flight 77, they would have seen that Flight 77 was WEST of Washington D.C. when they told NEADS that Flight 11 was NE of Washington D.C.
Why is it such a stretch for you to actually look at the facts? Flight 77 was near West Virginia when the FAA told NEADS that Flight 11 was over New Jersey
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
You did see an airplane, remember? Oh wait, look behind you. Is that the television? Hey now, is that American Idol?
Oh man, I can't wait to see Simon's face when someone doesn't sing very well.
Doesn't a beer sound good about now? If you have a beer at least Paula Abdul won't be alone, waka waka. Paula's so crazy.
So what's on after American Idol?
Wait a sec, what were we talking about? Eh, it doesn't matter anyway
Originally posted by GwionX
How can you *not* is the question. The transcript shows confusion.
How many times in history have four planes been hijacked at or near the same time , at or near the same location?
Perhaps the FAA controller was watching freakin' TV like the rest of us ..and THAT led to the confusion...because he wouldn't have been dealing with a very unusual situation at work now would he! Of course if he had been watching TV he would have been up to speed on the crashes.
The controller mistakenly thought 77 was infact 11 (wishful thinking, but wrong!)
The Controller didn't know where either plane was. just "further South" remember at this point there was only one plane left --flight 77. She thought 11 was still in the air...we know it crashed ..the controller didn't, and assumed the radar signature was 11..it was 77..it was further south...AND west as well..had it been comming from Boston it would have been further East...what you read in that transcript is the FAA's best guess estimate of the whereabouts of the plane incorrectly assumed to be flight 11. GET IT?
Yeah hindsight is 20/20 ...at that time they didn't know where either plane was...
NOW we all know it wasn't flight 11..but take youself back to 9/11/2001 as an air traffic controller.. and imagine what you would see on your screen with blips being identified..
planes being on radar then vanishing... this *we now* know is due some crashing and some flying off-course at low altitude, but in the tower, that day, they were just trying to make sense of it.
Then you get a unidentified blip heading to Washington. Make the call Nick...Make the call now Nick!! I am sure you would have relayed that it was a hijacked flight 77 ...now wouldn't you.
What if you had got the situation wrong, after being questioned for days, submitted your voluntary resignation, would you want to also be publicized as the bonehead that skrewd-up and let Osama attack Washington?