It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A top US diplomat has confirmed that a second U.S. aircraft carrier strike group has been deployed to the Gulf in order to send a clear signal to Iran that they will be crushed if they continue to defy the wishes of the US government by enriching uranium.
"The Middle East isn't a region to be dominated by Iran. The Gulf isn't a body of water to be controlled by Iran. That's why we've seen the United States station two carrier battle groups in the region," Nicholas Burns, U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, said in an address to the Dubai-based Gulf Research Center, an influential think-tank, as reported by the AP .
Last week, a former commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Admiral Eduard Baltin , revealed that he believes a missile attack on the Iranians is imminent, while Republican Congressman and 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul fears a staged Gulf of Tonkin style incident may be used to provoke air strikes on Iran
Indeed there were numerous strange reports of incidents occurring in the Gulf from rumours of nonexistent clashes between Iranian and American battleships to those of missile strikes on U.S. vessels.
Meanwhile the AP and Reuters have been filing misleading reports stating that Iran has barred IAEA inspectors, an allegation that turns out to be inaccurate according to the IAEA themselves who today stated:
"It should be noted however, that there are a sufficient number of inspectors designated for Iran and the IAEA is able to perform its inspection activities in accordance with Iran's Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement."
Iran has also begun massing troops along its borders with north Iraq, in addition to launching missile war games , while top a Middle East analyst and former State Department official has gone public with claims that U.S. plans envision a broad attack on Iran, rather than surgical strikes, as part of a war that likely would further destabilize the Middle East for years.
Originally posted by LightWorker13
....look at what he actually says...."American and Israel will soon end lives"...
Originally posted by JSR
Originally posted by LightWorker13
....look at what he actually says...."American and Israel will soon end lives"...
correction, it says" ....end thier lives....."
Originally posted by DJMessiah
Originally posted by JSR
Originally posted by LightWorker13
....look at what he actually says...."American and Israel will soon end lives"...
correction, it says" ....end thier lives....."
Read the title of the article "Ahmadinejad: Be assured that the US and Israel will soon end lives". As you can see, the site the article is written on can't even make up their own minds on which lie they want to post.
Once again, if anyone can find his real quote, post it, or let me translate it in Farsi.
Originally posted by JSR
i dont know how to use the external source stuff, but, here it is from the article
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad… assured that the United States and the Zionist regime of Israel will soon come to the end of their lives," the Iranian president was quoted as saying.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Who CARES what Iran says! Seriously, sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me!
Translation: Until Iran NUKES Israel, or bombs Israel, or sells weapons to terrorists, or attacks then US, then there is no reason...absolutely none... to attack them.
Now bring all the troops back to secure the borders and use the military money on improving the US.
Can I get an Amen
Originally posted by DJMessiah
Originally posted by JSR
i dont know how to use the external source stuff, but, here it is from the article
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad… assured that the United States and the Zionist regime of Israel will soon come to the end of their lives," the Iranian president was quoted as saying.
And the title of the article gives a completely different quote, which is the issue I'm raising. Why would they "translate" his quote into "will end lives" for the title, and then rewrite it again in the article as "will end their lives" ?
Surely, you can see the propoganda.
Originally posted by DJMessiah
And the title of the article gives a completely different quote, which is the issue I'm raising. Why would they "translate" his quote into "will end lives" for the title, and then rewrite it again in the article as "will end their lives" ?
Surely, you can see the propoganda.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Why is it that anything that goes against your notions is propaganda, while anything that corroborates your points are accepted at face value?
When I first posted this thread, the quote was "end their lives," so I don't see them as having changed the quote for purposes of subterfuge.
Explain why, when you see the actions of the Iranians(i.e. nuke program, supporting terror in Lebanon, Israel, and Iraq, threatening US and Israel), that we should assume that these quotes mean anything other than what was said?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
So the prudent course of action is to wait until someone gets nuked, or a terrorist group gets nukes before any action should be taken. This seems to be a very dangerous policy. The whole premise of preemption is that the stakes are too high to accept the first hit where 10s of thousands to 1 million + casualties could result. That's an unacceptable amount of risk, which is why when you see leaders making threats and persuing a nuclear program, you have to take them deadly serious.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Originally posted by BlueRaja
So the prudent course of action is to wait until someone gets nuked, or a terrorist group gets nukes before any action should be taken. This seems to be a very dangerous policy. The whole premise of preemption is that the stakes are too high to accept the first hit where 10s of thousands to 1 million + casualties could result. That's an unacceptable amount of risk, which is why when you see leaders making threats and persuing a nuclear program, you have to take them deadly serious.
It is absolutely ridiculous to go to war with a country over what they say. Most of Americans want no more wars. No more death. Better health care. That isn't so unreasonable...right?
Starting wars over propaganda and things "said" is foolish. Like I said, until Iran actually does something, there is no reason to go to war with them. I frankly want NO MORE wars.
Originally posted by DJMessiah
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Why is it that anything that goes against your notions is propaganda, while anything that corroborates your points are accepted at face value?
Is it that difficult to see that they provided two different quotes that were supposed to have come from the same translation? Using a misquote to further one's agenda is propoganda. If you would like me to believe that it's not, then please do explain why they gave us the two different translations.
When I first posted this thread, the quote was "end their lives," so I don't see them as having changed the quote for purposes of subterfuge.
I checked this topic very early on, when it was posted and the article's title remained the same as it is now.
Explain why, when you see the actions of the Iranians(i.e. nuke program, supporting terror in Lebanon, Israel, and Iraq, threatening US and Israel), that we should assume that these quotes mean anything other than what was said?
Because they do mean something different. It's one thing to believe what a propoganda website such as they say, and it's another thing to actually speak the language and know what they're really saying. I've said it before and I'll say it again, nothing ticks me off more than someone misquoting or misinterpreting a quote to further their own agenda.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
In my profession, I'd be ecstatic if there were no more wars, but it's simply pie in the sky to think that's going to be the case. I'm not willing to have an American city get nuked, to provide me with enough evidence to get off my butt to do something.