It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Myollinir
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
Want to know how I know creationism is what's up?
Evolution.
It is not random, and look into it because you could totally prove that to me. Conscious structuring and limitations.
Thank you.
Originally posted by Cuppy
This brings up the question why Evolution didn't just make all animals beings of pure energy, or something.
More realistically, why are gorillas and chimps so primitive when humans are so advanced?
Seems kind of weird for some to evolve and others not.
Originally posted by Myollinir
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
Want to know how I know creationism is what's up?
Evolution.
It is not random, and look into it because you could totally prove that to me.
Conscious structuring and limitations.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Just because things adapt, change, and or evolve, it doesnt mean that is how they came into existence. It would be absolutely idiotic for science to assume that.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Just because things adapt, change, and or evolve, it doesnt mean that is how they came into existence. It would be absolutely idiotic for science to assume that.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
First off stop using inorganic objects to argue against the theory of evolution. It shows complete ignorants to the subject.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
The part I quoted is equally as silly. Science does not just assume common decent is true because of Evolution.
What makes Evolution the "Theory" great is we can use it to make prediction. One of those predictions was life on Earth all has a common ancestor. Guess what ? It has been test over and over again. Not one time has it failed.
en.wikipedia.org...
We see it in the fossil record, we see it in distribution on species (it fits with plate tectonics), and maybe most importantly we see it in genetics. It is absolutely idiotic to try to argue against it.
Not trying to be mean, it really is. You have obviously not even took the time to study the subject for 10 minutes before calling one of its pilers "idiotic".
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
If your just going to come back with same "designer same design" Google it and debunk it yourself, I will not even acknowledge a argument that has been dead the last 10 years.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Just because things adapt, change, and or evolve, it doesnt mean that is how they came into existence. It would be absolutely idiotic for science to assume that.
And that's why they don't. Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life, it has to do with the diversification of life. Scientists have an entire different field devoted to life arising from non-life called abiogenesis.
If tomorrow I created life in a laboratory from scratch,
Originally posted by randyvs
To suggest that intelligence just rose up out of nowhere one day is loony. Sorry but it is.
I'll take common sense over evidence all day long.
Originally posted by john_bmth
No, it's far more plausible that some bearded nutter clicked his fingers to create the world before sending down his Zombie Lord son to save us, whereupon we can feast on our Zombie Lord's flesh and quaff his blood every Sunday. That DEFINITELY makes a lot more sense. Praise the Lord!
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy
If tomorrow I created life in a laboratory from scratch,
This is never ever going to happen.
Mad
Science can't even put the human body together. Let alone bring the life force
( the soul ) to it. Just exactly the same way it would never happen by accident ( primordial soup ). Life was created. Speculate all you want about the rest. But there isn't any other explanation. The intelligence a few of us
possess and the life force that animates us, was created. No one can ever come close to making me think any
thing different. To suggest that intelligence just rose up out of nowhere one day is loony. Sorry but it is. I'll take
common sense over evidence all day long.
The amount of time for life to get going via evoluci'on would be somewhere near infinite. Now you take a billion years. Compare that to infinity. Suddenly one billion yrs looks like a day. Ok a week then.
I claim another victory for Christ.
If tomorrow I created life in a laboratory from scratch
Originally posted by dbates
The Phylum that humans are in also contains buzzards, catfish, and even hippos. Still there are no fossil records or any ties that can show an intermediate state or a common state between a buzzard and a catfish. The differences between other phyla are even more extreme. There is no macro evolution, only mico changes within a species.
Sudden appearance and stasis. That is the essence of the fossil record that we have. These creatures appear, and they stay basically the same.The only natural selection is in the selection of fossils that scientist place side by side to try to prove this philosophy called evolution.
Originally posted by dbates
The Phylum that humans are in also contains buzzards, catfish, and even hippos. Still there are no fossil records or any ties that can show an intermediate state or a common state between a buzzard and a catfish. The differences between other phyla are even more extreme. There is no macro evolution, only mico changes within a species.
Sudden appearance and stasis. That is the essence of the fossil record that we have. These creatures appear, and they stay basically the same.The only natural selection is in the selection of fossils that scientist place side by side to try to prove this philosophy called evolution.