posted on Jan, 20 2007 @ 05:51 PM
To tell you the truth, since when did anyone really need actual evidence to stage a huge show of a trial? Who said that evidence is always enough to
convict?
I always thought OBL claimed the honor of being mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, though I never beleived he was really the one behind it. Anyone
can claim something, it's not that hard if you think about it, but admitance would of been enough to try him on.. i would think.
To tell you the truth, i've not done that much investigating of this topic... because i think the US goverment was the real masterminds, and he's
just a figure used to cover up the real truth.
As to where he will be tried? He won't be. He won't be caught either. He's probably protected by the goverment (us, that is) that is hunting
him. That's my two cents...