It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by discomfit
It's not exactly a secret that large jets can be remotely controlled.
I once saw a very good video of it done in the 90s I think. Here is the only info I could dig up for now: NASA : Controlled Impact Demonstration.
In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) teamed-up in a unique flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), to test the impact of a Boeing 720 aircraft using standard fuel with an additive designed to suppress fire.
[skip]
On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet.
[skip]
During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.
So ya... this was in 1984. I'm pretty sure they can do the same and better today.
Riddle me this
Why didn't any of the planes transmit their hijack code ? All these trained pilots and no one sent out the signal ? OR PERHAPS they were taken over electronically and it didn't matter what button they pressed.
Originally posted by Boone 870
originally posted by ULTIMA1
If you will acknowledge there is no evidence of the hijackers getting acess to the keys.
I admit that there is no evidence of the hijackers using keys. Also, I admit that there is no evidence of the hijackers kicking the doors in.
Originally posted by AMTMAN
In order to select a code the pilot has to turn and reach to the side and then make four seperate motions.
Originally posted by Boone 870
What I have said is, that there are keys in the passenger cabin that the hijackers could have used.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Boone 870
Will you acknowledge the fact that there were cockpit door keys on the aircraft?
If you will acknowledge there is no evidence of the hijackers getting acess to the keys.
Originally posted by Disclosed
You said you acknowledge the fact that there were cockpit door keys on the aircraft.
originally posted by ULTIMA1
So would you say that the 8 pilots had more or less then 4 seconds to get off a call or signal before the hijackers were in the cockpits?
Originally posted by Boone 870
After they got into the cockpits? I would say less than two seconds.
Originally posted by Animal
If you knew anything about commercial aricraft you would know the whole idea of a remote takeover of a 757 or 767 is nothing more than a parnoid fantasy.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
So you do know that you can disconnect the autopilot by simply pushing a button, or pulling a circuit breaker don't you?
originally posted by ULTIMA1
So how long would you say it took them to get into the cockpit, i mean if they did not have a key. And remember how long it took the passengers of flight 93 to get int to the cockpit with a cart.
originally posted by ULTIMA1
Tell me, are the pilots going to sit and do nothing while the cockpit door is being forced or are they going to be making calls?
Source
Based on the design specifications for the strength of these doors, while they may well be bulletproof, they are probably not person-proof.A moderately heavy man could run up to the cockpit door, throw himself against it, and burst it open
originally posted by eyewitness 86
They didn't all have commercial ratings...wromg. Mosyt could not rent a Cessna so please..
Originally posted by Boone 870
This person is talking about the new reinforced doors.
In the middle of their training, in late September, Atta and Alshehhi enroll at another flight school, in nearby Sarasota. However, they are soon asked to leave it, and return to Huffman in October (see Late September-Early October 2000). While Atta and Alshehhi attend Huffman Aviation, another of the alleged hijackers, Ziad Jarrah, is taking lessons at a flight school just down the road from them (see (June 28-December 2000)). Yet no reports describe the three ever meeting up while they are all in Venice. According to official accounts, Atta and Alshehhi complete their schooling at Huffman on December 19, 2000, when they take their commercial pilot license tests. Rudi Dekkers says that after returning to the school to settle their bills, they leave and are never seen there again.
Hani Hanjour, the Saudi pilot who flew American Airlines flight 77 into the Pentagon, "had lived in the United States off and on throughout the 1990s, mostly in Arizona, intermittently taking flying lessons at several different flying schools." He was, in the view of one of his flight instructors, "intelligent, friendly, and 'very courteous, very formal,' a nice enough fellow but a terrible pilot." He finally got a commercial license from the FAA but was unable to find work here or in the Middle East.