It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheBorg
What exactly is meant by that?
Originally posted by smallpeeps
...most disease is quite often brought about by conditions external to the person. Environment and surroundings affect health more than anything, I believe. I'm not knocking the scientific method, just the ethical integrity of the medical megaphone which tells us what to fear. The outside world affects the immune system more often than the STD fear-monger tells the truth, is what I was trying to say.
Originally posted by soficrow
The policies saying health is a 'personal responsibility' and 'it's all genetic' result from manipulated data and junk science. Real and responsible science supports your - and my - position.
...Responsible scientists recognize that human industrial activities create diseases like CA-MRSA.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
But anyway, this thread is about MRSA which I didn't know much about it until this thread. It doesn't sound incurable so at least there's no hugely profitable drug-cocktail that BigPharma can push here like with HIV.
Originally posted by soficrow
On another thread about another subject, whitewave made these comments:
It is a well known fact that in the history of diseases, no sexually transmitted disease has ever been eradicated. Any treatment that depends on personal self-will/discipline/compliance doesn't stand a chance of effecting a cure.
***
...the aids virus has an affinity for the tubercle bacilli (tuberculosis) and attaches to it easily, making aids an effectively airborn disease.
At present, ca-MRSA is not recognized as airborne. But viruses DO hitchhike on airborne bacteria.
And they mutate, and hybridize.
What might happen if CA-MRSA hooks up with the flu?
Time for a new theory of disease, and a new medical paradigm, methinks.
.
this is all too suspect. In this situation I don't know whether to think it is traditionalist leaning elements in government(force abstinence till marriage) or leftist pro-homosexual elements behind this(or let the problem go on). Either way someone in D.C should be fired over this.