No War Under a Woman

Originally posted by NotTooHappy
I think that if a woman was in power there'd be a conflict every 28 days. Nukes might get launched on her heavy days.

[Edited on 12/11/03 by NotTooHappy]

Might? Might?

And vicious! You think the Taliban was rough on their prisoners, like the reporter? That would be nothing compared to what we could see.

Originally posted by Sapphire

Originally posted by Saphronia
Don't take it personally...huh Joe? I'm taking names...just so I know who to take my monthly frustration out on.

There are plenty of women that are pro-war. Plenty of women willing to fight and die. But, I do think the lack of testerone would be a good thing when dealing with global issues that could lead to aggression...

Is that enough words for you guys? since women gab too much I don't wanna make this too long--your lil pea brains might explode.

LoL ... Go Girl ~ hi-5

... and i might like to add that it was a Man who created the A Bomb The Nuke Guns Tanks and Other fun toys like that

[Edited on 12-12-2003 by Sapphire]

i think you gals should get a turn to rule the world...that way i can seduce you all in turn, or at once??

chauvinist pig? no, just confident

[Edited on 12-12-2003 by Cyrus]

Originally posted by NotTooHappy
I think that if a woman was in power there'd be a conflict every 28 days. Nukes might get launched on her heavy days.

Hehe....sexist, but funny, hehe....

Besides, have you heard how women talk about other women behind their backs? There'd be war all the time, hehe....

i think this should be seriously considered, women are more peaceful..do u agree on that gazrok?
besides, the male sex is dying out as we speak, another million years or so and the female race will be world-dominant.

Not at all...

Women are far quicker to anger than men in my experience, and tend to get worked up over slights, that men would simply let slide....

You've obviously never seen two women fight, hehe....

I disagree Gazrok

I'm a very very peaceful sort of person, i almost never get angry, i love to laugh and i hate Gossip big time.

Ahh...but you are the exception then...not the rule...

We're talking about generalities... There are always exceptions... See, when guys have a disagreement, there is either a pissing contest (in a matter of speaking) or a fight (whether physical or not). However, there is a clear victor in BOTH men's view, and it concurs. Then, the battle is over, and the two can go right back to being friends...like it never happened (most of the time).

This is where the difference is...and why this difference isn't generally suited for politics. I'm not saying a woman can't be a great politician...she can, and several are. I've voted for several of them. What I'm saying is, in general temperament...the idea that women would be better in politics may not be accurate. It is the individual's merits that need to be weighed, and this goes for BOTH sexes... There are just as many men , who have tempers and hold grudges...(I even tend towards grudges, but you've REALLY gotta tick me off for that....)

Originally posted by Cyrus
i think this should be seriously considered, women are more peaceful..do u agree on that gazrok?
besides, the male sex is dying out as we speak, another million years or so and the female race will be world-dominant.

do you guys forget history? lol some of the cruelest leaders in history were women...

Originally posted by Sapphire
I disagree Gazrok

I'm a very very peaceful sort of person, i almost never get angry, i love to laugh and i hate Gossip big time.

find a good looking "brianna banks"-like blonde, 6'9 and a double 36d and i'll be a slave 4 life!!
sadly, this is not the case, i am forced to fight off the evil holding this world in it's grasp.
*veers off into paradise, and cyrus being...the last male living in a woman-infested world*

Originally posted by Gazrok

Originally posted by NotTooHappy
I think that if a woman was in power there'd be a conflict every 28 days. Nukes might get launched on her heavy days.

Hehe....sexist, but funny, hehe....

Besides, have you heard how women talk about other women behind their backs? There'd be war all the time, hehe....

"the President of russia thinks my hips are too big? THAT VODKA DRINKING BITCH! we'll just see about that. General, contact SAC, and tell them to level those bastards!"

[Edited on 12-12-2003 by KrazyIvan]

Originally posted by insite
I was just watching Comedy Central Network on TV and a trailer for the next episode of Tough Crowd with Colin Quinn came on. I'm not a big fan of the show, I think the contributing guests are unaware of their ignorance and basically state unresearched (and to me on occasion, offensive) statements in an attempt to generate laughs. Anyways, there was a woman on the trailer who said (looked quite serious to me):

There would be no war if women were in power.

I don't like to categorize, especially along gender lines. Do you think there is any validity to this statement? Who governs better, men or women? What is your idea of governing well? Wars are essential in providing a little kick when the economy gets poor, would the global economy be poorly affected by a staunchly anti-war governing body?

Please. First off, a woman can get just as upset as a man can, and a woman can be just as rightous as a man can. A woman can be out to serve her own political needs just as a man can, and if a war will serve them, then war we will have.

iv also heard us males are a "dieing" breed

man, then with no guys there would be no humans??


im almost sure the world would be unlivible before that happends