No War Under a Woman

I was just watching Comedy Central Network on TV and a trailer for the next episode of Tough Crowd with Colin Quinn came on. I'm not a big fan of the show, I think the contributing guests are unaware of their ignorance and basically state unresearched (and to me on occasion, offensive) statements in an attempt to generate laughs. Anyways, there was a woman on the trailer who said (looked quite serious to me):

There would be no war if women were in power.

I don't like to categorize, especially along gender lines. Do you think there is any validity to this statement? Who governs better, men or women? What is your idea of governing well? Wars are essential in providing a little kick when the economy gets poor, would the global economy be poorly affected by a staunchly anti-war governing body?

Originally posted by insite
I was just watching Comedy Central Network on TV and a trailer for the next episode of Tough Crowd with Colin Quinn came on. I'm not a big fan of the show, I think the contributing guests are unaware of their ignorance and basically state unresearched (and to me on occasion, offensive) statements in an attempt to generate laughs. Anyways, there was a woman on the trailer who said (looked quite serious to me):

There would be no war if women were in power.

I don't like to categorize, especially along gender lines. Do you think there is any validity to this statement? Who governs better, men or women? What is your idea of governing well? Wars are essential in providing a little kick when the economy gets poor, would the global economy be poorly affected by a staunchly anti-war governing body?

there is no validaity to that statement. war is going to be around as long as people are around nop matter if a woman is in power or not. plan and simple. its always been that way and it always will be

There would be no war if women were in power. . . . because they'd be to busy talking.

Isn't that a good thing?

Originally posted by StationsCreation
There would be no war if women were in power. . . . because they'd be to busy talking.

God, that's sooo true.

I'll say this. There'd be COLD WAR.

Anyone that's been married knows what I'm talking about.

Originally posted by StationsCreation

actually did you ever get stopped by a female cop???


they arte MUCH worse then male cops...

they are MUCH stricter!

I think that if a woman was in power there'd be a conflict every 28 days. Nukes might get launched on her heavy days.

[Edited on 12/11/03 by NotTooHappy]

Originally posted by NotTooHappy
I think that if a woman was in power there'd be a conflict every 28 days. Nukes might get launched on her heavy days.

[Edited on 12/11/03 by NotTooHappy]

or on her periods...

yhat what you maybe meant...

That is what I meant.

Originally posted by NotTooHappy
That is what I meant.

thought so...

no wonder we have onlt man as persidents...

I think women hold a grudge longer than men. Also I can see a global catastrophe every month around the same time.

The commentary above was meant to be a joke, don't take it too seriously.

Originally posted by joehayner
I think women hold a grudge longer than men. Also I can see a global catastrophe every month around the same time.

The commentary above was meant to be a joke, don't take it too seriously.

lmao

Don't take it personally...huh Joe? I'm taking names...just so I know who to take my monthly frustration out on.

There are plenty of women that are pro-war. Plenty of women willing to fight and die. But, I do think the lack of testerone would be a good thing when dealing with global issues that could lead to aggression...

Is that enough words for you guys? since women gab too much I don't wanna make this too long--your lil pea brains might explode.

Saph: Ummmm. I really didn't say much on this thread, ya know...

Originally posted by Saphronia
Don't take it personally...huh Joe? I'm taking names...just so I know who to take my monthly frustration out on.

There are plenty of women that are pro-war. Plenty of women willing to fight and die. But, I do think the lack of testerone would be a good thing when dealing with global issues that could lead to aggression...

Is that enough words for you guys? since women gab too much I don't wanna make this too long--your lil pea brains might explode.

Uh-oh guys, we've made her mad.

we were just joking

i would like to see more woman in "power"

besides 2 brains are better then 1 :w: j/k

maybe we need the leaders of the contrys to go into a boxing ring

How about Mrs. T, when she put the smack down on Argentina? I think plenty of women are pro-war, the whole soccer mom-to-safety mom demographic is said to have supported the Iraq 'war'.

Rant, lol @ cold war. I know exactly what you mean!

Originally posted by Saphronia
Don't take it personally...huh Joe? I'm taking names...just so I know who to take my monthly frustration out on.

There are plenty of women that are pro-war. Plenty of women willing to fight and die. But, I do think the lack of testerone would be a good thing when dealing with global issues that could lead to aggression...

Is that enough words for you guys? since women gab too much I don't wanna make this too long--your lil pea brains might explode.

LoL ... Go Girl ~ hi-5

... and i might like to add that it was a Man who created the A Bomb The Nuke Guns Tanks and Other fun toys like that

[Edited on 12-12-2003 by Sapphire]

What about Margret Thatcher. She took Britian to war in the Faulklands. She was one mighty Bitch man, she messed up our country. I think a women would be just as good as male President. Noone could be as bad as Bush anyways.