It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Suspicious? Why on earth would it be suspicious? I don't get what you mean by that. Could you explain, please?
Originally posted by billybob
it's a suspicious 'hobby'.
No, I'm debunking the chemmie claims aout HAARP.
i notice you're also debunking the stated objectives and methods of HAARP.
Huh? Why would you get sad about me debunking "chemtrails" and the false claims for HAARP? I really don't see why that would make you sad!
that makes me sad.
Embarass myself? Huh? How could that be? In order to embarass myself, I'd have to be grossly wrong about something, and so far I haven't seen any chemmie proving me wrong about ANYTHING I have said! However, if someone actually DID manage to prove me wrong about something, I would welcome it, and learn from it.
... so wrong on many counts. your starting to embarass yourself.
Wrong! Here are the corrections:
Originally posted by Aliceinwonderland
I think people are confusing contrails with chemtrails. Both exist, and both happen. Difference?
Contrails:
-Happens at 40,000 feet alt and above
-Naturally occuring due to ice crystals forming due to temp.
-Dissolves after a few minutes.
If you have little knowledge on the subject then my suggestion is to research it and then base your conclusions.
Good idea! So when do you plan to get started on your research? I'd suggest that you start with a basic meteorology course. Please let us know as soon as you pass your first exam, and then you can come back and debate with some real knowldege under your belt.
Yep. I do hope you are ready to give up your bliss, now? There is nothing wrong with being ignorant of a subject. But there sure is something badly wrong with wilfully STAYING ignorant, and flat refusing to get learn some real science.
But to those that don't know the difference between the two but have already formed an opinion I say this....ignorance is bliss.
Really? That's what the Air Force says? Great! So please point us at the AIR FORCE document that makes this declaration. Not a chemmie web site, mind you, but an actual, official Air Force document.
What's the difference between a jet contrail and a chemtrail? According to the U.S. Air Force, jet contrails form above 33,000 feet when hot engine exhaust momentarily condenses ice crystals into pencil-thin vapor trails that quickly vanish like the wake behind a boat.
Which is EXACTLY what contrails do.
Chemtrails (CTs) look like contrails initially, but are much thicker, extend across the sky and are often laid down in varying patterns of Xs, tick-tack-toe grids, cross-hatched and parallel lines.
Whicj is EXACTLY what contrails do, and have always done, for the past 87 years, aprox.
Instead of quickly dissipating, chemtrails expand and drip feathers and mare s tails. In 30 minutes or less, they open into wispy formations which join together, forming a thin white veil or a "fake cirrus-type cloud" that persists for hours.
Fact: There is no such thing as a "Chemtrail". Contrails are safe and are a natural phenomenon. They pose no health hazard of any kind.
Originally posted by Bangin
I will subscribe to any belief system that I choose, so put a sock in it. . . . I thank all of you that made an effort to respect other member's beliefs.
Originally posted by Bangin
From jra's link:
Fact: There is no such thing as a "Chemtrail". Contrails are safe and are a natural phenomenon. They pose no health hazard of any kind.
StuartAllsop, get a grip. I will subscribe to any belief system that I choose, so put a sock in it. Based on the manner that you present yourself, I'd have to say that your supposed goal to lead us on the correct path, and prevent us from becoming further victims to a laughable hoax, is simply bull$hit. I cannot prove the existence of 'chemtrails'. That's not my goal.
I thank all of you that made an effort to respect other member's beliefs.
Originally posted by THENEO
The spooks job is to flush out those interested to find out if they have 'proof.'
Proof means they can be found out, means they did not keep their secrets well. Means they have been compromised.
I don't need proof of anything, my souce is 100% accurate and that is all I need.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Fine, at least you admit that it is a "belief system" and not based on any proof.
You can start up the "First Church of Chemtrails," assemble your flock outside on a nice winter day, look up and ooooH, Ahhhhhh, "look at the pretty clouds overhead." then take everyone back inside and pass around the collection plate.
Originally posted by Bangin
By the way, many people believe in things without 'proof'. I do not subscribe to any religion, but I do believe in ghosts. The scientific community is not satisfied with the lack of proof to support the existence of ghosts. Guess what? I don't care. My personal experiences are evidence enough for me.
Originally posted by THENEO
Proof?
LOL, why do you think I got into conspiracy in the first place?
The proof was above my heads day after day before my eyes!
chemtrails are more obvious than nearly any other conspiracy out there, maybe that is why you have to shoot it down, you know a lot of it starts there.
sorry but I am not here to battle with government agents.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Having faith that chemtrails exist because somebody else says they do is nothing like faith in a god or religion.
Originally posted by Bangin
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Having faith that chemtrails exist because somebody else says they do is nothing like faith in a god or religion.
I do not believe in chemtrails because 'somebody else' does. My eyes noticed irregularities, then I believed something was happening in the sky.
For as long as I can remember, I've known the meaning of 'ghosts'. I had no reason to believe in ghosts so I did not. Then, one fine day, I had an experience that proved their existence (to me). I didn't believe in ghosts until my own senses gathered reasons to. The same goes for these trails. Forget what everyone else says, my eyes tell their own story. That is exactly why I find these debates useless. You cannot take my experiences from me and you haven't explained them away to my satisfaction. Don't even bother.
Originally posted by billybob
say, bangin'. what do you think? do you think AR, howard, and stuart have proven that our eyes don't work? or do you think their adamance, derisive and repetitive style make them look like disinfo pros?
i had never seen a 'sundog' in my life. now, ive seen three. or a luminescent contrail. or those wispy type contrails. i guess i'm just blind and stupid. woah is stupid, blind, unscientific me.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Call me what you want. Actually, I'd LOVE to get one of those jobs being a "spook" as you call them. What a hoot! I'd get paid for proving you wrong with scientific evidence!
No, I'm no spook...just a poor air force guy that has flown too many hours in the last few months (been busy, you know?!) so I have to fly the desk for a while, giving me time to have some fun.
Thanks for supplying it in such abundance!
And you still misquoted me...
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Excuse me, but you started this thread...did you not think there would be discussion on both sides of the coin?
Originally posted by billybob
it's always my pleasure to bring joy to people.
been bombing villages and stuff lately? those little children are better off without there lives and limbs, anyway. sorry to hear it tires you out. that must be rough, too.
and lord knows we have to protect the corporate power pyramid. where would we be without our masters?