Best Tank!

I wonder how many Russian tanks got owned in afganistan when they lost??????

Originally posted by jetsetter
Ok we never said that a western tank could not get destroyed. They can no tank is invincible. Western tanks are just better. I will see if I can get some picks of the junks yards miles long of Russian tanks and such in Iraq.

All Russian weapons are like AKs..

Powerful and always functional..

US weapons are like M-16s..

They jamm and fail..

Please, no one fails, only county that failed was Russia when they fell. v

*I want to post this again to see what Fulcrum says *



Sorry Fulcrum, but tanks wont compare to American and Isreal and British tanks after they are equipped with the new high-powered laser beam. Support in Article "A" Is a excerpt of an article supported by CNN News Agency & BBC News Agency. With this added onto tanks, this would own all Russian tanks. Thank you, goodnight.


Article 'A' The US army has, for the first time, shot down an artillery shell in flight using a high-powered laser weapon. Link 'A'


Article 'B' The White Sands test marked the first time that a rocket has been destroyed in flight by a laser beam. The laser has also proved its ability to shoot down artillery shells. Link 'B'


GET LINKS IN OTHER POST



Thank you, USA owns

[Edited on 26-11-2003 by Laxpla]

Originally posted by Laxpla
I wonder how many Russian tanks got owned in afganistan when they lost??????

US Vietnam war was as long as USSRs Afganistan war..

10 years both..

USSR lost 13000 KIA..

US lost 56000 KIA..



In your face MOFO!

And btw,

I aint Russian..



And also..

Who is now in Afganistan? Fighting against Guerillas?

US IS!



And btw,

you lose people killed there daily..

Its just not shown in the CNN..

The war in Afganistan is far from over..

Originally posted by Laxpla
*I want to post this again to see what Fulcrum says

*



Sorry Fulcrum, but tanks wont compare to American and Isreal and British tanks after they are equipped with the new high-powered laser beam. Support in Article "A" Is a excerpt of an article supported by CNN News Agency & BBC News Agency. With this added onto tanks, this would own all Russian tanks. Thank you, goodnight.


Article 'A' The US army has, for the first time, shot down an artillery shell in flight using a high-powered laser weapon. Link 'A'


Article 'B' The White Sands test marked the first time that a rocket has been destroyed in flight by a laser beam. The laser has also proved its ability to shoot down artillery shells. Link 'B'


GET LINKS IN OTHER POST



Thank you, USA owns

[Edited on 26-11-2003 by Laxpla]

1st of all..

Tanks will not ever have laser guns.

If they will have somekinds of other main guns these will be rail guns.



2nd..

When US/UK/Israel has these..

So will Russians..

WHO WON THE WAR? WHO LOST THE WAR? We won, you guys lost against afgan. Thanks kind of sad, please reply to my above post poverty child.

Ask a Frenchman about the best tank and he'll say : Definitely the Leclerc
Ask an American about the best tank : Definitely the M1A2
Ask a Russian : Definitely the T-80 or T90
Ask a Belgian or Finnish : Any tank in the world but ours!


BTW....how come we never see any pictures of destroyed T-80's or T-90's?
Is it because they haven't seen combat yet?
Many are afraid to admit that those particular tanks aren't indestructable?
Shame?
WHAT??

John/Fulcrum........you know better than this...you really do, and the sad part is that you know that!
If you wanna play with fire, be prepared to be burned back.

I would like to suggest that we all get a grip and get back to normal discussions rather than who # is better and whose isn't!


regards
seekerof

Fulcrum, YES tanks will have them on it, even if they dont, one will be near a tank. Russians wont AFFORD the tech even if they are given half the money. So, it all comes down to TECH and MONEY


USA OWNS

Here we are

Sadd....

Originally posted by Seekerof

BTW....how come we never see any pictures of destroyed T-80's or T-90's?
Is it because they haven't seen combat yet?
Many are afraid to admit that those particular tanks aren't indestructable?
Shame?
WHAT??

regards
seekerof

T-80s and T-90s have been used in combat..

Some might have been damaged.. but of destroyed i havent heard of..
(But it is very likely that some have been destroyed..)

These have been used in Chechenya..

It is just that Russian dont claim their tanks to be anything else that they are..

Russians also dont wonder and made up lies if their tanks get hit and destroyed..

They just live with it..



You Americans do..

Blah, we got the best tanks, helicopters, subs and ships (british and isreal have best guys), I mean, whats better allies? We have cananda which is not really that big of a support, but there a army . Now, with the laser tech, we can shoot down all your missles, artillery, nukes, anything but gun fire. and with the gun that shoots around corners, BLAH, now with 1 million rounds a mintue? AMAZING www.cnn.com... Please, dont be denial

I think the question about which MBT is best is irrelevant. As we've seen from the last several wars it's not just armor vs. armor.

Statistics from the last two middle eastern confrontations are available and show that the latest generation US made MBT and the upgrades available to them make them almost nigh indestructible to land base weapon fire.

Lest we forget the lessons learn from WWII and repeated again and again, armor regardless of it's strength is useless without air superiority.

The Russian will make it and the people with the right money and connections will own it, and the Americans will blow them up like so many party balloons. It is the nature of the world right now.

hrxll

fulcrum, do not bother talking with Laxpla, you will hear nothing but YUO KOMMEH!1 GO USAUSAUSA!1

Laxpla
First of all you are white.(American)
Thats why you HATE Russian Technology.
Thats way you want to prove it bad.

Also the lasers on tanks is Bull#.

And by the time it becomes a fact Russia will have enough money to buy them too.

If you dont follow Russian economy then I will tell you that in 4-10 years Russia will become the superpower.

I know you will say it BS but it ok you will have to just wait and see.

The Russian economy is growing 8% a year and US economy is growing 3-4% a year.

I dont hate US technology.

They have nice things but you can just SHUT UP about Russian tech being a peice of trash.

If it will come to a war between Russia and US you and I will both be dead.

So just chill out and stop being a RACIST!

I dought that Russia will come as big as a superpower as it once was. Also I do not think they we actually be getting a bigger military. If they want to become a superpower they have to focus that money somewhere else. Also the United States is groing and th economy is imroving so dont talk like you know.

Originally posted by HerExcellency


The Russian will make it and the people with the right money and connections will own it, and the Americans will blow them up like so many party balloons. It is the nature of the world right now.

hrxll

This is bunch of #.

Do you thing Russia has no aircrafts?

And when it comes to war between Russian and US it will not be armor vs armor or the air superiority.

It will be nuke vs nuke

and in that war NOBODY will win.

But Russia would have a better chance cause Russia is almost 3 times as big as US.

Originally posted by jetsetter
I dought that Russia will come as big as a superpower as it once was. Also I do not think they we actually be getting a bigger military. If they want to become a superpower they have to focus that money somewhere else. Also the United States is groing and th economy is imroving so dont talk like you know.

I talk like i know cause I know what I am talking about.

Russia right now is putting in 2004 21% more money in military.

And Russian economy is growing faster.

Also Russia is the second biggest oil exporter.

And oil is money.

Yes but most of that area is either frozen or no people live there. I really dought there is going to be a war though. If there ever is going to be one it will be way off in the future.