It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lab Rat
Hi Guys the original photo looks to be taken from near this same spot- notice the "train" shaped object just left of the center of the photo?
/36equy
Originally posted by roadgravel
jritz
I normally view maps with North to the top. I rotated your overlay 135 degrees.
Would you agree that your origrinal is not oriented with north up? I am comparing to the Ohare map.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Hey jritzmann,
It's a mirror image, that IMO shows a view from the right hand side of an Aircraft, placing the runway in front of the Aircraft and on the left of the photo. If we were looking out of the left hand window of an aircraft between the runway and taxiway we'd see the runway on the right hand side of the photo.
[edit on 26-1-2007 by lost_shaman]
Originally posted by Majic
1. It doesn't match the conditions described by the witnesses.
Originally posted by Majic
2. The "UFO" is in the corner. Who would frame a shot to put a UFO in a corner? How does that make sense?
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Just pointing that out. In fact anyone who ever takes a pic of a UFO would be well advised to include the landscape even if the UFO is not Centered in the picture.
Originally posted by Majic
Granted, context is necessary, but that still doesn't explain the composition of the shot.
Originally posted by Majic
And it definitely doesn't explain why the "UFO" was so thoughtfully aligned with the camera's odd angle and not the ground.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
I'm just not sold one way or the other yet.
Originally posted by Majic
Putting Things In Context
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Just pointing that out. In fact anyone who ever takes a pic of a UFO would be well advised to include the landscape even if the UFO is not Centered in the picture.
Granted, context is necessary, but that still doesn't explain the composition of the shot.
And it definitely doesn't explain why the "UFO" was so thoughtfully aligned with the camera's odd angle and not the ground.
Unless I'm expected to believe that the "UFO" was hovering at a bizarre angle and the photographer decided to match that angle while putting it in a corner -- which would be expecting too much, in my opinion.
Granted, maybe I'm just not understanding what would be an even more bizarre set of circumstances than even the witnesses described, but at some point attempting to explain away the photo's oddities ceases to be analysis and begins to resemble creative writing.
Originally posted by sergejsh
Originally posted by Postal76
I think depending on your vantage point, the dark part of the drop can appear to be the top or the bottom.
I found few photos taken in rainy weather condition (cropped versions):
and again, alleged "O'Hare UFO" photo (cropped):
Nobody see similarity?
.
[edit on 25-1-2007 by sergejsh]