It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pavil
So if you go about destroying a lab or someones property "for the animals" shouldn't you be punished for such an action? I'm sorry but when you hurt others in the pursuit of your political or social goals in America I think it is fair that you should pay the consequences of your actions.
`(A) intentionally damages or causes the loss of any real or personal property (including animals or records) used by an animal enterprise, or any real or personal property of a person or entity having a connection to, relationship with, or transactions with an animal enterprise;
`(B) intentionally places a person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to that person, a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person, or a spouse or intimate partner of that person by a course of conduct involving threats, acts of vandalism, property damage, criminal trespass, harassment, or intimidation;
`(C) conspires or attempts to do so;
`(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment not more than 1 year, or both, if the offense does not instill in another the reasonable fear of serious bodily injury or death and--
`(A) the offense results in no economic damage or bodily injury; or
`(B) the offense results in economic damage that does not exceed $10,000;
`(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, if no bodily injury occurs and--
`(A) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $10,000 but not exceeding $100,000; or
`(B) the offense instills in another the reasonable fear of serious bodily injury or death;
`(3) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if--
`(A) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $100,000; or
`(B) the offense results in substantial bodily injury to another individual;
`(4) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both, if--
`(A) the offense results in serious bodily injury to another individual; or
`(B) the offense results in economic damage exceeding $1,000,000; and
`(5) imprisonment for life or for any terms of years, a fine under this title, or both, if the offense results in death of another individual.
Originally posted by selfless
how about those who peforms animal cruelty and murder, howcome they are viewed as the good ones?
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
If you are going to echo cliche opinions & judge organisations such as Peta & Animal Liberation, at least be as shallow as to read a wiki page: en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Waiting2awake
BTW - what would you do? If your chioce is damaging some equipment and getting nailed under a terrorist law, Or just offing the guys and get nailed for murder? Why is the equipment carry a heavier charge?
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by Waiting2awake
BTW - what would you do? If your chioce is damaging some equipment and getting nailed under a terrorist law, Or just offing the guys and get nailed for murder? Why is the equipment carry a heavier charge?
Please, please. please READ the proposed law before you go spouting nonsense. If you damage equipment you can get a fine and imprisonment, not more than 20 years. If you "off" the person as you put it, you can get up to and including a life term. You make no sense at all when you state things incorrectely that have been posted 2 or 3 times in this particular thread. The latest was only 3 replies above you and quite full of the punishments. Take a breath, read it and then post.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
If you are going to echo cliche opinions & judge organisations such as Peta & Animal Liberation, at least be as shallow as to read a wiki page: en.wikipedia.org...
Well as far as I am concerned animal testing benefits mankind so why not use it?
I will be darned if I am going to listen to the likes of Ingrid and her band of thugs hell they killed dogs in NC last year, yet have the guts to claim they stand for the ethical treatment of animals! I don't think so. :shk:
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
I am simply saying... if you are going to be for (or against) animal testing, the least you can do is read a simple wiki about it so you can justify your opinion in a semi-articulate manner. You owe it to the animals being (ab)used for 'mankind's benefit' to at least know about what they go through.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
I am simply saying... if you are going to be for (or against) animal testing, the least you can do is read a simple wiki about it so you can justify your opinion in a semi-articulate manner. You owe it to the animals being (ab)used for 'mankind's benefit' to at least know about what they go through.
Science has already done the justification for me, they have proven by using animals to test new drugs they can save people from death.
What would you propose they do; Test new drugs on humans and kill them?
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
I'm not proposing anything here. You are championing a cause yet you can't even be bothered reading a simple wiki about it. Ignorance must be bliss for a self-proclaimed 'guardian of the world'.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
I'm not proposing anything here. You are championing a cause yet you can't even be bothered reading a simple wiki about it. Ignorance must be bliss for a self-proclaimed 'guardian of the world'.
Why should I read that tripe? I already made it very clear the science has proven using them is right by saving lives. If believing in science is ignorance; I will take it any day of the week over using humans as test subjects.
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
I am simply saying... if you are going to be for (or against) animal testing, the least you can do is read a simple wiki about it so you can justify your opinion in a semi-articulate manner. You owe it to the animals being (ab)used for 'mankind's benefit' to at least know about what they go through.
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Is the government doing this to protect business from inconveniences they might encounter in future?