It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Toltec
Actually the majority is those who are secular in respect to religious belief, despite the apparent vocal effort of fundamentalist to say they are the majority is a lie.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Good arguments i must say. However, what makes you think the Bible is any more real or valid than other books like the holy grail and the holy blood or even the book of Enoch for that matter which many have rejected in the church as heresay.
Originally posted by Toltec
If man is evolving then the idea that one day (say for instance in a million years), he will be able to do the kind of things, which are often defined with respect to, what prophets do is not unrealistic. These people are simply another species of the genus homo and quite frankly, when they are born in our society. There reaction and responses, are the result, of adapting to environmental conditions of which there role is emphasized.
Of course there are those which can be defined from the context of being evil, but to be clear. A lot of that has to do, with the way they are treated and the stigma applied, to what for them is simply a
physiological capacity.
A major portion of the DNA in humans is dormant; I submit, that in the case in what are called prophets, those dormant genes are active, or in some other way, the genetic profile is different.
I further submit, that what has been done in respect to these people, makes no sense whatsoever.
Any thoughts?
[Edited on 14-11-2003 by Toltec]
Originally posted by Toltec
It's interesting you should make that comment Jagd, as rather, one is inclined to consider the opposite as more valid, especially in light of 1 Corinthians 15:14-20.
Specifically, what evidence exists of his death and resurrection outside of the Bible?
A lot more than simply doing good deeds has been justified by this event, forgiveness for sins which had not been committed seems a rather interesting advantage.
Lets face it, if a person does something on impulse that is inherently wrong, he or she can at the very least know that going to heaven wont be an issue.
The same thing applies the next time it happens, poor impulse control being part of Gods plan has a myriad of advantages would you not agree?
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Toltec
My impression is Jezebel, that in us there is something inherently divine, in other words, in all things. Mankind is so preoccupied with what the means to him, they are not concerned with what that could mean to God.
It would entail seeing issues from all points of view.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Another flash bulletin for those who choose not to listen, if He didn't die and pay the price for our shortcomings as the perfect sacrifice, then we will go to Hell.
Originally posted by Toltec
Simply stated TC my issues are with all religions (that made clear the day I arrived) as far as fixations take a good look in the mirror.
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Another flash bulletin for those who choose not to listen, if He didn't die and pay the price for our shortcomings as the perfect sacrifice, then we will go to Hell.
Take the blue pill, Neo.
Originally posted by Toltec
By the way, I wish to apologize for any misunderstanding that occurred yesterday, in respect to my modifying a post. Personally I meant no malice and the reality is, while I could have posted the content in question in a new post I simply wanted to make clear my initial response was made jokingly.
Any thoughts?
[Edited on 15-11-2003 by Toltec]
Originally posted by Toltec
Jagd what about the verses in Acts we discussed in the past, which clearly present that Jesus did not die on cross?