It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sleeper
Will have our troops fleeing from Iraq with their tails between their legs. The rest of the world will applaud that sign of weakness because it will prove that America is just like them, nothing but sheep.
that’s why I call myself a moderate.
Show me a democrat who favors NAFTA, do you?
The vote on NAFTA is most accurately characterized as bipartisan. Although more Republicans than Democrats supported NAFTA in both houses (102 Dems, 132 Reps in House; 27 Dems, 34 Reps in Senate), the numbers are reasonably close.
Originally posted by Roper
If the Demorats win both houses, the war will be funded and nothing will change in that regard.
Middle-income America prepare to taxed! Gun owners prepare to be assaulted.
Originally posted by dgtempe
As far as taxes, you're all so afraid to be taxed a little, but dont care about the Trillion deficit and the cost of the bogus war and Halleburton and others profiting bigtime?
The dems also hate or at least make lots of noise against things that make democracy possible, which is Capitalism.
The Dow Jones industrial average rose 119.51 points, or 1 percent, to 12,105.55, snapping a losing streak that followed a record high on Oct. 26. Speculation that Democrats may take control of the House of Representatives and the Senate from Republicans in elections today aided the rebound.
Since 1948, Republican Administrations have controlled the White House 57.2 percent of the time. But during the period that the GOP was in office, stock returns have averaged only 9.53 percent per year, while under Democratic administrations, stocks returned 15.25 percent per year, more than five percentage points higher.
Originally posted by zoopnfunk
If you are correct we would expect the markets to be running scared at the prospect of a democratic takeover this election. Instead, the opposite appears to be coming to fruition:
there are more rich democrats than there are republicans
Our results suggest that the popular journalistic image of rich latte-drinking Democrats and poor NASCAR Republicans is a gross oversimplification," Park says. "Income varies far more within states than average income does between states, and it is these with-in-state variances that explain national voting patterns."
The bottom line, the study suggests, is that little has changed in terms of income's general influence on individual voting patterns: in every presidential election since 1952, the richer a voter is, the more likely that voter is to vote Republican, regardless of ethnicity, sex, education or age.
Originally posted by sleeper
And nearly every large city has been run by democrats for the last three decades.
Originally posted by tsloan
Stop spreading your Rushisms...And open your conservative blinded eye's. The republicans and democrats ARE THE PROBLEM. And another party vote is the solution it's just as simple as that.
Originally posted by intrepid
I hear ya zoopnfunk, I wouldn't mind seeing stats on this too:
Originally posted by zoopnfunk
I'd like to see some evidence backing that claim up. Once again you seem to be injecting personal opinion without providing any sources to back up your claims. You would find me to be more forgiving if you could at least attribute your information to a source. I'm not even sure such a study has been conducted.
On a side not, Republican candidates sure don't seem to have any problems getting the lion's share of donations from major corporations... election cycle after election cycle Republicans accumulate more funds than Democrats.
I have been involved in real estate, building houses, and every single supper rich developer was a Democrat. I have known lots of people and lots of rich people---all democrats. I have lost out on many deals because I couldn’t keep my mouth shut and I let it out that I was republican.
I read and keep up with economic and political news that is local and national, and from what I have gathered the dems easily out number the republicans when it comes to money and influence.
Our results suggest that the popular journalistic image of rich latte-drinking Democrats and poor NASCAR Republicans is a gross oversimplification," Park says. "Income varies far more within states than average income does between states, and it is these with-in-state variances that explain national voting patterns."
The bottom line, the study suggests, is that little has changed in terms of income's general influence on individual voting patterns: in every presidential election since 1952, the richer a voter is, the more likely that voter is to vote Republican, regardless of ethnicity, sex, education or age.
Originally posted by elaine
I'm sorry but those "fear tactics" aren't working so well anymore. I will vote for the person not the party.
I refuse to be categorized or fear-mongered to. Rational thought needs to take the lead now, not fear and propaganda.
Originally posted by sleeper
Originally posted by tsloan
Stop spreading your Rushisms...And open your conservative blinded eye's. The republicans and democrats ARE THE PROBLEM. And another party vote is the solution it's just as simple as that.
I have yet to listen to even one Rush program, I only know about that guy from liberals like you who keep bring him up.
So you don't like either party? Are you a communist? If so the communist are indorsing the democrats.