It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
I thought they said that they couldn't find any black boxes from any of the planes..
Originally posted by WolfofWar
They're campaign that they seeded throughout the internet with the "no plane hit the pentagon" disinfo is about to come to a close. People bought it hook line and sinker, sucked up every word the cointelpro agents said, and now the rugs going to be permenantly swept up underneath all conspiracy theoriests permenantly discrediting them and ANY theory they have.
Bravo NSA, bravo.
Originally posted by SportyMB
Is it really all that hard to believe that a plane hit the pentagon on 9/11?
Originally posted by Springer
Someone else pointed out if the release the video one week from today (or yesterday) the elections will be over with, done, history so I don't see how this video is going to have an impact on the mid terms.
IF, however, Monday morning the FBI releases the video then there is a different light to the issue.
The reality of the sitation is the total number of people who believe, suspect or even consider the possibility that something other than a plane hit the Pentagon is so small I doubt it will impact the mid terms at all.
The VAST majority of the voters in this country have not considered anything but the 9/11 commission report. To think there is some huge group of millions of people (it takes MANY millions to swing an election) holding their breath waiting to see if a plane is clearly seen on the video to prove one way or the other that a plane actually did/did not hit the Pentagon is not realistic. A few thousand maybe a few hundred thousand TOPS is more like it.
Springer...
Originally posted by DickBinBush
So, in conclusion, what supports a plane theory? Just because the government said so? Point out one thing that strongly supports the plane theory. Don't show me that one piece of debris that was light enough to be carried away by hand. Give me something conclusive.
Originally posted by Valhall
DIB,
A jack load of eye witnesses.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Why is it that people don't believe in a plane because there is "not enought" evidence, yet believe in "something else" for which there is no evidence?
There were no missile or hologram parts found at all, and there was much more than one peice of debris found.
www.911myths.com...
While there may not be "enough" evidence of a plane crashing there for some people, that is the only thing that there is any evidence of.
Why the double standard of evidence?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by DickBinBush
So, in conclusion, what supports a plane theory? Just because the government said so? Point out one thing that strongly supports the plane theory. Don't show me that one piece of debris that was light enough to be carried away by hand. Give me something conclusive.
Why is it that people don't believe in a plane because there is "not enought" evidence, yet believe in "something else" for which there is no evidence?
There were no missile or hologram parts found at all, and there was much more than one peice of debris found.
www.911myths.com...
While there may not be "enough" evidence of a plane crashing there for some people, that is the only thing that there is any evidence of.
Why the double standard of evidence?
[edit on 4-11-2006 by LeftBehind]
Originally posted by Valhall
You asked a question and I answered you. What you decide to do with the evidence available on this particular event is your business. But that is evidence. It just floors me how people can dismiss evidence when it doesn't fit their theory.
By the way, no one's produced any hard evidence on this missile thingy. At least the plane in the building theory has witnesses.