It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Valhall
Good deduction, Nerdling. But I'm trying to get straight how much damage could really be done to Hoover with a cargo plane. I don't know, that's a big slab of concrete!
My gut leans toward multiple suicide bombers in casinos, but that's just my guess.
Either way, I'm glad we're thinking through this!
Originally posted by Nerdling
Could the 36, 25, 36 be a possible time guide for the attacks, 36 hours after saudi the next one might hit, then 25 hours after that, and the last being at the same time as the first (36 hours after saudi)
Today's date is 9-11 backwards!!
Originally posted by straterx
For the less complex among us
IF you attack the USA
We Will Kill You
You = Radical Islam
If the innocent must die too thats to bad
Originally posted by Quicksilver
BUt sure the hoover damn would be good target for symolism and stuff but you would also have to plug in the human factor or the body count factor. I mean how many ppl would be killed im sure it would be a big fiscal loss for the country and take out alot of towns but the terrorist know that in the end we might be pissed about the loss of million and millions of dollars but we are a rich nation we recover they onw the only thing that really make us angry is the death of fellow americans especially on US soil. I think springers idea is laot more plausable. I know the security is there in casinos to moniter theft but how about the security to stop someone commin in with bombs strapped to them orinside of them. But still its vega its holds no politacal terrorism value like NYc, DC, or even LA. Part of me is sayin LA better look out but why would the terrorist wanna piss off some of there biggest supporters to the downfall of the USA. I hope we are all wrong tho. But i doubt itll be the 11th im thinkin the 13th
Originally posted by Valhall
I might point out the " fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams" from the latest Homeland Security release.
U.S. WARNS OF AL-QAIDA CARGO PLANE PLOT
November 9, 2003
The Associated Press reports: "The latest warning from the Homeland Security Department that al-Qaida may be plotting an attack is renewing calls for stricter security on cargo planes.
The department advised law-enforcement officials Friday night of threats that terrorists may fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams, Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.
Originally posted by energy_wave
Originally posted by Valhall
I might point out the " fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams" from the latest Homeland Security release.
U.S. WARNS OF AL-QAIDA CARGO PLANE PLOT
November 9, 2003
The Associated Press reports: "The latest warning from the Homeland Security Department that al-Qaida may be plotting an attack is renewing calls for stricter security on cargo planes.
The department advised law-enforcement officials Friday night of threats that terrorists may fly cargo planes from another country into such crucial U.S. targets as nuclear plants, bridges or dams, Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.
What about that missing cargo plane which which was converted into a tanker? You know the 727 that someone stole right from under the flight controlers nose.
Originally posted by Valhall
I don't agree. I think the "Washington-New York-Los Angeles" comment has been a distraction and I believe that is a call to activate cells in those cities to "depart immediately" to perform their mission.
I think we may be on to something.
Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.
Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.
Originally posted by mishapscott
You, sir, seem way too excited about terrorist attacks.
Originally posted by mishapscott
Nerdling,
I won't stuff a sock in it. I wasn't even talking to you. Ask yourself :
1. Do you seem excited about a terrorist attack?
2. Did I specifically say your name in my message?
If anything, you and Vahall are the only ones to do actual research. I respect that. Why get defensive when it's obviously not you I was talking to?