It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Galvatron
To: Thatsjustwierd
I didn't mention invade. I'm talking about the ramifications with Iran and the Iraq theatre.
Originally posted by Indy
NK couldn't get off a successful missle test. What makes people think this really was a nuke? Would we know any different if NK packed an old mine full of explosives and set it off just to make the world think they conducted a small nuclear test? I mean 4kt and no radiation leak. Could easily just be alot of explosives. Only thing better than a nuclear test is making people believe you conducted a nuclear test.
Originally posted by Indy
NK couldn't get off a successful missle test.
Originally posted by Indy
What makes people think this really was a nuke? Would we know any different if NK packed an old mine full of explosives and set it off just to make the world think they conducted a small nuclear test? I mean 4kt and no radiation leak. Could easily just be alot of explosives. Only thing better than a nuclear test is making people believe you conducted a nuclear test.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Yes Japan can develop nuclear weapons, easily, if it so chooses, and they have the means by which to deliver them, the obstacle is not a military or technological one, but rather political. However the US basing a few (land based) ICBM's in Japan would send just as strong a message, while they would offer the US no real strategic military advantage (from what we have now) it would be a huge political and psychological move.
Also, if there is doubt it was a nuclear tests erase it from your mind, intelligence forces all over the world knew within minutes that it was nuclear in nature. We have the assets and the means to determine it's source fairly quickly. But yes, it was more of a dud then a "great success".