It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Originally posted by bsbray11
You said first impact to last collapse, or whatever, in addition to the French thing. Naudet Bros were the only ones to capture the first impact and everything that followed to my knowledge.
Key words here: "To my knowledge."
Thus you made an assumption, correct?
Yeah, of course it was a "whine," but here is the kicker: you, as traditional with 9/11 WTC conspiracy 'specialists,' have still failed to provided indisputable and conclusive evidences. Ironic, huh? Just when, exactly, do you all plan to conclusively prove these multitudes of 9/11 conspriacy theories?
Originally posted by dperry4930
Oh I am quite sure explosive 'experts' will come out of the ATS woodwork and attempt to explain how 'real' explosives don't operate under the simple laws of physics
....
The reason why I immediately take with a huge grain of salt some individual suddenly weighing in with his or her expert opinion on high explosives is because how often have you read posts on this very board where people portrayed themselves as an expert or knowledgable in some arcane field, with no proof whatsoever?.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
It melts thru the steel armor plating and how big are those rounds? Not too big I would imagine.
This document provides a historical perspective on the sequence of declassification actions performed by the Department of Energy and its predecessor agencies. It is meant to convey the amount and types of information declassified over the years.
B. THE PLOWSHARE PROGRAM
1. Mere fact that the U.S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work. (58-8)
2. The cost of fabricating and firing a device 30" in diameter and of a few kt yield, all from fission, would approximate $500,000 when made available in small numbers. (58-9)
1. Enhanced Radiation Weapons (ERW)
a. The mere fact that the U.S. is interested in pursuing a program to determine the characteristics of an "enhanced radiation" weapon (neutron bomb). (63-5)
b. The fact that the W-79 is an enhanced radiation weapon. (78-1)
2. Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR) Weapons
a. The fact that we are interested in and are continuing studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and internal induced activity. (67-1)
b. The fact of weapon laboratory interest in MRR devices. (76-3)
c. The fact of successful development of MRR devices. (76-3)
3. Nuclear Directed Energy Weapons (NDEW)
a. The fact that DOE weapon laboratories are engaged in a research program to explore the feasibility of a nuclear explosive driven directed energy weapon. (82-2)
b. The fact that research is being conducted on the specific concept of a nuclear pumped X-ray laser. (82-2)
c. The fact that the DOE is interested in or conducting research on NDEW concepts of certain specified generic types of output; i.e., visible light, microwaves, charged particles, kinetic energy. (85-4)
d. The fact that underground tests at the Nevada Test Site have been and are a part of the NDEW research program. (85-4)
Originally posted by Damocles
the description given to me by a drill sgt who had been a 12E until the job was shut down was "you spend hours packing a bridge with C4. i walk out into the middle, drop my backpack, leave, and a few hours later theres a manmade lake where the bridge was"
Originally posted by Damocles
yeah, but the neutron bomb was not a traditional nuke in that it didtn go boom so much and wipe out cities.
the NDEW is discussions of what became regans star wars project. particle beams etc. these arent nuclear bombs.
also remember when you are talking "low yeild" in terms of nuclear weapons...5KT is concidered "low yeild"...but thats still equivilant to 5000 TONS of tnt. even .5kt is still 500 tons of tnt. there is still radiation. theres still a massive fireball. theres still a blinding flash of light. (the same flash that blinded japanese people over great distance evn though their eyes were closed) and theres still a boom to make a rock concert seem like a quiet whisper.
there are just some things we havnt gotten past yet.
u think someone at MIT wouldnt find this and throw it out on the web so fast the govt couldnt shut him up?
Originally posted by Damocles
neutron bombs, yes specifically referenced in the material you quoted, only reason i brought it up
if they can make a nuke that is, for lack of a better word, safe. they can also figure out how to use that tech to make power.
btw bsb, HOW did you get me back into a 9-11 thread? punk
I can think of someone who just might be onto something in the field of energy, that it seems like no other institutions have really looked into, or made public, you know? lol
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Dear Everybody:
I did not realize how few have actually heard of the proposition that hydrogen bombs were used to destruct the four world trade center buildings on 11-Sep-2001. The originator of this scenario is a Finnish scientist who — understandably — wants to remain anonymous. He is backed up by a thirty year veteran researcher at the CERN particle accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland. A lot of “darn good brains” (no I’m not talking about myself) have thought about this seemingly off-the-wall scenario — and concluded that this is most likely what happened. But being that we’re having a healthy discussion, we’re still “praying” for new ideas in the hopes of finding a new more pleasant reality.
All events of 9/11 are directly related to our whatever-it-takes quest for oil. Our lifestyle is non-negotiable — per our vice president. So, in a world of ever-increasing shortages we’ve taken the lead in the squabble over the remainder of this particular resource. And we feel that we are morally and godly justified to do anything we please as long as it’s in America’s strategic interest.
With this in mind it is only logical to deduce the following:
1. “Al Quada” never existed. It is strictly an invention of our U.S. government.
2. WTC1, WTC2, probably WT6, and WTC7 were brought down by hydrogen bombs (augmented with thermate cutting charges)
3. The damage at the Pentagon was done strictly with (conventional) bombs.
4. A passenger plane was shot down over Shanksville, PA but not at the “official site”.
The key links to the hydrogen bomb theory are:
1. www.saunalahti.fi...
2. www.saunalahti.fi...
3. arxiv.org...
Go ahead, melt those poor guys' servers!
Greetings,
The Wizard In The Woods
There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew. ~Marshall McLuhan, 1964
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
In my view nearly all the “live” interviews on TV on 9-11 were “bogus”, i.e. edited and staged.
[edit on 10/6/2006 by Wizard_In_The_Woods]
Originally posted by razor1000
the whole notiion that Hbombs were used is idiotic, a nuclear weapon in NY would have destroyed more that just those 2 buildings.
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Dear razor1000:
Thank you for your post!
Finally, finally we have an eyewitness report which is firsthand. You may think I’m being cynical but I’m dead-serious. In my view nearly all the “live” interviews on TV on 9-11 were “bogus”, i.e. edited and staged.
So you really are the first person I’ve come across who’s actually SEEN a plane slam into the WTC. Which brings me closer to believe — and you will find this ludicrous — the hologram theory. It’s heavily under discussion on ATS at “Why there were no planes at the WTC…” Check it out and let us know what YOU think.
Greetings,
The Wizard In The Woods
[edit on 10/6/2006 by Wizard_In_The_Woods]