It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
EMP would of been extremely minimal if these devices were detonated deep underground, they need to be detonated in the atmosphere to create wide spread damage.
video.google.com...
Originally posted by Astygia
Even if a low-yield nuke were buried in the sub-basements, and the EMP range were cut in half, or a third, or even a fourth, we're still talking about hundreds to thousands of feet
EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.
Again, the only way the nuke theory stands is by assuming we have an extremely clean, small, non-EMP producing nuclear device, and at this point it would be so dummed down I don't see why they'd bother with it over more conventional demolitions. Which is why I don't see the point in pushing the issue.
Originally posted by longbow
LOL, these conspiracies start to be funnier and funnier. I'll not even try discuss the possibility of hydrogen bomb in WTC, however I have just one point about pure fusion bombs. I don't know from where you have this.
Even if it was possible to make fusion bomb without fission part, the weapon would be not clean. Fusion still produces a lot of neutrons and when those neutrons are captured by surrounding material the result is that the material becomes highly radioactive. Indeed it is not that bad and has much higher fallout as transuranic elements but it still contaminates area and kills people. We are talking about weeks of lethal radiation instead of years, but it would be definitely detectable even now.
Originally posted by Astygia
As always, BSB posts well.
To be fair, I'll gladly concede that there's no way of knowing how advanced our arsenal is.
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
I think I am missing something obvious here...
If a hydrogen device was set in sub-basement 3, focused up the freight elevator shaft, how did the destruction "Wave" start at the top? Did I miss where he explains this?
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Dear Everybody:
The key links to the hydrogen bomb theory are:
1. www.saunalahti.fi...
2. www.saunalahti.fi...
3. arxiv.org...
Originally posted by Seekerof
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Dear Everybody:
The key links to the hydrogen bomb theory are:
1. www.saunalahti.fi...
2. www.saunalahti.fi...
3. arxiv.org...
Dear whomever:
The "key" to debunking this alleged "hydrogen bomb theory" are:
1. Geiger-Muller counter
2. Vibration & Seismic Detectors
3. The fact that there was no trace of residual radiation found anywhere within or around the detonation site(s).
Therefore, the alleged "theory" does not even fit the word's very definition, thus amounts to being an illogical model of unverified 'factoids' or collection of garbage.
[edit on 3-10-2006 by Seekerof]