It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
even more questions:
why not just use that bomb (like you say mr lear) and nothing more and state that somehow a "terrorist" got inside and blew himself up
that's what i would have done if i were this "most evil of planning evil acts person"...
by the way, where do you get your info from???
Originally posted by they see ALL
even more questions:
why not just use that bomb (like you say mr lear) and nothing more and state that somehow a "terrorist" got inside and blew himself up
that's what i would have done if i were this "most evil of planning evil acts person"...
by the way, where do you get your info from???
Obviously not where you get yours.
Originally posted by Terral
Yes. We can provide them pictures of the Missile, the white vapor trail and the white explosion and they still must run back to the ‘passengers’ that have nothing to do with any Missile at all.
It is difficult to simply accept that your opinion is wrong and you have been duped by the DoD and Bush Administration, even when no 100 Ton Jetliner exists in any of the evidence.
I believe America is ready to live under a Fascist Dictator and Martial Law by the testimony of these PLANE Theorists.
One of the owners (Springer) has taken a personal interest in me and now is harassing me every day with something...
PisTonZOR, was this image your 'plenty of evidence? This was your evidence of a 250,000 pound airplane crashing into the Pentagon? That little scrap of aluminum?
No, not just that piece...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
Umm no, it was a lot more than that. But I understand you not wanting to acknowledge things that prove it was a 757 that hit.
Ah, I see the "they planted the wreckage" argument is still alive and well. Hard to believe anyone thinks that with all the witnesses who were there when it happened. They would have noticed forklifts dropping off the pieces.
No. No, swampfox, they put the parts in there BEFORE the crash. You see. they had to make it look like the airplane crashed IN the Pentagon. If they hauled in the parts AFTER the crash in would have looked too suspicious
Originally posted by Terral
Hi John:
John >> See what I mean?
Yes. We can provide them pictures of the Missile, the white vapor trail and the white explosion and they still must run back to the ‘passengers’ that have nothing to do with any Missile at all. It is difficult to simply accept that your opinion is wrong and you have been duped by the DoD and Bush Administration, even when no 100 Ton Jetliner exists in any of the evidence. I believe America is ready to live under a Fascist Dictator and Martial Law by the testimony of these PLANE Theorists.
One of the owners (Springer) has taken a personal interest in me and now is harassing me every day with something. He will likely come in here and move this thread to SomeWhereElseVille like he did all of my Christian work from the Religions room. Good for him. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, I have found somewhere else to spend my time. The true terrorists are working behind the scenes through a shadow government that manipulates our elected officials. They are developing their cover story for a well placed nuke to strike somewhere in California and probably a twin cities location like Oakland using similar smoke screen tactics we see at the Pentagon. Everyone here should prepare themselves to live under the chaos perpetuated by these behind the scenes terrorists bringing in their New World Order. People like Springer would rather you stay sound asleep.
GL, it’s been real,
Terral
Originally posted by johnlear
Sorry they see ALL
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
No, not just that piece...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
www.911myths.com...
Thats it? A strut, a compressor case and a wheel. From a 250,000 pound airplane?
Maybe the rest of it liquefied? Thanks for the input Swampfox.
Are you suggesting that the only way it would be possible, is if someone had a web site that had pictures of every single peice of a disintigrated plane posted? How many plane crashes do you know about that has a web site that shows every single last piece of debris from the crash? And how many of those were from planes that crashed full speed into concrete?
Here's the thing. We have provided photographoic evidence of the plane. Photographic evidence of the passengers. DNA evidence of the passengers. Photos of passenger belongings. Eyewitness testimony of the plane hitting the building. Sceintific studies done showing how the plane liquified and caused the damage pattern left.
None of that is worth anything to you guys. But instead, you guys have presented an alternate theory which has no evidence, no phontos, no nothing to prove it. So I am having a hard time understanding how some of you are so dismissive of the evidence when in place of it there is none.
One of the argument is that it would be too difficult to fly. And while My Lear certianly has the cridentials to make that claim, there are other equally qualified pilots who claim just the opposite. So while Mr Lear's take is 100% valid, it is not the only credible opinion on the matter.
So basically it doesn't really seem to matter what the evidence is. Evidence optional.
I would still like to know how a missle managed to hit the light poles which were not in a straight path, and how it managed to hit the generator and air shaft on the sides of the impact. I think everyone is avoiding this question because even though we are ignoring and dismissing all evivdence, this one even conjecture has a hard time expaining.
I would once again also like to point out the recent plane crash in NYC. Notice how The damage to the building in no way has an entrence hole big enough to fit a plane? Just like with the Pentagon. And for the same reason. The plane simply does not puncture a hold the shape of the plane like in Bugs Bunny cartoons. There's no wing marks, no tail marks, just empty window holes with fire.
And again, it's too hard to program a remote controlled plane to hit the Pentagon, but not a missle that can zig zag around and do 180 dgree turns at 500 mph which don't show up on the video people claim is a missle?
Forgive me for being skeptical, but this is a bit much to believe.
And how did those pieces of the fuselage manage to survive, without a scratch or burn mark, the initial impact and explosion?
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
ANOK said:
And how did those pieces of the fuselage manage to survive, without a scratch or burn mark, the initial impact and explosion?
Did you miss that most of them are crumpled? Im pretty sure if you looked at them you might find a scratch or two amongst the bend, folded, multilated parts..........
As for no burn marks...are you sure? you can really tell that from internet photos? I dont think so. The fact that many of the upper fuselage pieces were found OUTSIDE the Pentagon means that they werent exposed to fire for long.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
As for no burn marks...are you sure?