It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexanWay of the Peaceful Warrior
I am only bothered by enhancements without the original image, enhancements that are not presented as enhancements and image alterations that do not enhance anything and are presented as enhancements.
Originally posted by zorgon
To ArMaP and all those who are bothered by "enhancements" of images in this thread... take a look at this set...
THIS IS HOW THE SPACE SCIENTISTS ENHANCE THE IMAGES SO THEY CAN BETTER SEE WHATS THERE...
In other words, it is PERFECTLY OKAY to use enhancement to bring out details...
Originally posted by ArMaP
And you do not have to shout.
Originally posted by Chimaira
I don't usually participate in forum discussions, but the EROS picture struck my eye and reminded me of this site below.
And I want to know what you people think of this site. Here's the link
www.enterprisemission.com...
Originally posted by zorgon
If you recall Iapetus is the one with the seam around the middle and the metallic look...
[edit on 5-5-2007 by zorgon]
Originally posted by braddman
Cross posted from another thread...
Originally posted by johnlear
This is from that same Apollo 15 photo above. Must have been the first day on the cut and paste job for this guy. I wonder what they are hiding?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Has anyone found any examples of pictures with features that are significantly different than in other pictures? For example, if the top of this mountain were different, or the mountain were missing altogether, the next time you saw the image?
Originally posted by zorgon
Anyone have any more information on this one? Its on CBS, a major network...
www.cbc.ca...
Any comments appreciated to track this one down
Dr. Leon Stuart was an avid amateur astronomer and early one morning while tinkering with a new camera, he had built for his telescope, he accidentally snapped -what some consider the rarest photo of all- a bright flash on the Moon. This flare was presumably caused by a massive, white-hot fireball of vaporized rock gasing from the center of the Moon's face. This ball of light lasted approximately 8 seconds according to Dr. Stuart. The photograph (seen below) does indicate an event of some sort taking place on the Moon's rugged exterior.
LUNAR FLARE
Made by Dr. Leon Stuart, Nov. 15, 1953 at 01:00 UT. Lasted 8 to 10 sec. Also observed visually. Star images rather steady, no extraneous lights. Exposure: 1/2 sec. on E.K. 103aF3 plate. 8 inch f/8 reflector.
Position on Lunar surface is about 10 miles S.E. of Pallas. (-0.5; +.08).
This photo is perhaps the most famous LTP photo in existence
If his observation was correct, Dr. Leon Stuart would be the first and only human known in recorded history to have witnessed and documented the impact of an asteroid-sized body colliding with the Moon's ancient surface.
In 1956, Dr. Stuart published his photo and theory in The Strolling Astronomer (Vol.10, 42-43), an amateur astronomy newsletter. However, skeptical astronomers dismissed Dr. Stuart's data as inconclusive and his theory as wishful thinking. Their explanations ranged from a meteor (point meteor) burning up in Earth's atmosphere to light aberrations to film problems. Still, until his death in 1969, [Note: The year of death has sometimes been given as 1968, but to according to official U.S. government data, it was 1969] Dr. Stuart remained convinced that what he'd seen was something impacting upon the Moon.
Largely forgotten outside of astronomy circles, 'Stuart's Event', as it eventually became known, was regarded as no more than a curiosity, with little legitimacy.
Yet, after enduring 50 years of skepticism and ridicule, Stuart's theory may finally be proven true by two scientists who have rekindled an interest in this 1953 mystery...
Dr. Bonnie J. Buratti, the principle scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. and Lane Johnson of Pomona College, Claremont, Calif., have been researching this most intriguing event and their findings include some very persuasive evidence which indicates that Stuart's photo was indeed real and is of immense historical value...
Initially, their efforts were unsuccessful as they examined images taken by the Lunar Orbiter spacecraft in 1967. But, upon searching the more detailed imagery from the Clementine spacecraft mission of 1994, they were able to locate and determine a highly likely candidate, a 0.93 mile (1.5 km) wide crater (seen in image below) with bluish tinged material surrounding the impact site...
In addition to the bluish hue and bright albedo, the crater's size matches what Buratti and Johnson estimate the energy produced by Stuart's flare, which they calculated to be about .5 megatons or 35 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Originally posted by VType
Hey Zorgon that bright flash captured in the 50's pic is within close proxiemity of your triangle shaped crater
Why do you say that?
Originally posted by zorgon
So Just WHAT WERE THEY BOMBING ON THE MOON in the fifties?