It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jinnez
Just an update, it is turning orange........I am going to keep an eye out!!
[edit on 10-9-2006 by Jinnez]
[edit on 10-9-2006 by Jinnez]
Originally posted by Spiderj
I believe (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) that the egg project doesn't neccessarily predict a future event but the eggs (REGS) are somehow reflecting the current emotional status of the planet.
So while red doesn't indicate that something will happen it indicates that something could happen.
I've been trying for years to fully understand the whole thing but it's a real brain burner.
Spiderj
Again, please feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting what this thing does.
Edit to add: This was meant to try and answer El Che's question.
[edit on 9/10/2006 by Spiderj]
Originally posted by Spiderj
That was very Lewis Black of SOT
But I actually believe the Princeton boys and girls are pretty serious about this and it actually does sound feasable when you read through the pages and see waht they're trying to do, but in the end it's still limited by the math and technology we have available.
Sort of like the bible codes, much easier to find correlating information after the event.
But the main difference being that this really isn't open to human interpretation (I believe) like someone searching for a 9-11 prediction in the bible codes or someone interpreting one of Nostradamus' predictions and being able to tie it into a well known event ala the hitler predictions and such...the egg project is simply computating and correlating the data as it comes in, in real time. But is it reading the emotional stability of the planet? Hard for me to say for certain.
However it's still hard to gauge the accuracy of it's ability to predict signifigant events before they happen. Meaning that if every thing goes red and pear shaped it's still hard to say yes something is going to happen and I sure near impossible to exactly predict where, when and how.
Spiderj
Originally posted by jtma508
I agree. If you spend some time on the GCP site it can get pretty heady. But the thing is, these REG's are devices that are used in all sorts of unrelated scientific areas. They've been around for a long time. What the GCP is finding is that periodically, this worldwide network of REG's slowly starts to lose its 'randomness'. They begin to all change away from the expected -- and normal -- random 0's and 1's. When they look at these periods of concordance against world events they find that they 'line-up'. In many cases with a 'hit' that is slightly ahead of the actual event. None of the scientists that have been working on the project since the 90's has any explanation as to 'what' is occuring. They only know that 'something' is. For certain.
Originally posted by jtma508
When they look at these periods of concordance against world events they find that they 'line-up'.
In many cases with a 'hit' that is slightly ahead of the actual event.
None of the scientists that have been working on the project since the 90's has any explanation as to 'what' is occuring. They only know that 'something' is...
Originally posted by Kupios
...If we are to follow the logical train of thought we end up having to accept that thought affects actions (by affecting thought) which would kind of destroy the basis for this whole supposed egg correlation showing global thought being a CAUSE for events. I don't mean the correlation isn't correct but just that it seems unwise to say it represents blobal thought...